Expressive Art Therapy for Elder Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

September 5, 2025 updated by: Prof. Fadi AL ZOUBI, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Exploring the Use of Supervised Group Art Therapy Among Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: Feasibility, Potential Efficacy, and Participant Experiences

This research project aims to assess the feasibility of expressive art therapy for elderly adults with chronic low back pain and to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of combining art therapy with exercise intervention. Additionally, the study will investigate facilitators and barriers to participation.

A mixed-methods approach will be employed, including a quantitative questionnaire and qualitative semi-structured focus group discussions. The questionnaire will examine physical, functional, and psychological changes potentially influenced by art therapy, while the focus groups will provide in-depth insights into participants' experiences and perceptions of the combined intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common and debilitating condition that affects millions of older adults worldwide, significantly impacting their physical, emotional, and social well-being. This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to explore the feasibility and potential effectiveness of a new approach that combines supervised group expressive art therapy with exercise for elderly individuals suffering from CLBP.

The primary goal is to assess participant recruitment, retention, and adherence to intervention. The investigators will also identify any logistical challenges that may arise during the process. To gather preliminary data on the intervention's effectiveness, the investigators will measure changes in pain intensity, functional ability, psychological flexibility, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

In addition to quantitative measures, the investigators will conduct qualitative interviews and focus groups to gain deeper insights into the participants' experiences. This will help to identify factors that facilitate or hinder their engagement with the program.

By incorporating expressive art therapy-an approach that encourages emotional expression and coping strategies-this study aims to provide a holistic method for managing pain. The ultimate goal is to enhance the quality of life for older adults affected by CLBP. If successful, this pilot RCT will offer valuable insights that could inform a larger, definitive RCT, paving the way for innovative, interdisciplinary strategies in chronic pain management and improving health outcomes in the community.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Fadi MQ Al Zoubi, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 60 years and above
  • currently experiencing non-specific low back pain for at least three months
  • who have sought medical treatment for CLBP
  • can read and write in Traditional Chinese
  • MoCA-5 of 18 or above

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malignant pain
  • lumbar spinal stenosis
  • confirmed dementia
  • severe cognitive impairment
  • serious major medical or psychiatric disorders
  • currently receiving physiotherapy, cognitive therapy, or psychological treatments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Expressive art therapy
One hour of expressive art therapy followed by exercise session.
each one-hour session in the exercise control group will involve progressive back and general reconditioning exercises, along with back care education to support self-management of LBP.
Active Comparator: Control Group: Exercise
The control group will be a one-hour session that includes progressive back strengthening and general reconditioning exercises, complemented by education on back care to support self-management of low back pain.
The intervention program consists of one hour of expressive art intervention followed by one hour of exercise training. Art therapy sessions will be conducted in small groups of eight participants, facilitated by a part-time registered expressive art therapist. Each session begins with a 5-minute introduction and check-in, welcoming participants and encouraging them to share their current status. This is followed by a 10-minute mindfulness exercise designed to center participants and promote relaxation, preparing them for the creative activities ahead. The core of each session features a 20-minute art-making process focused on specific themes that guide participants in exploring their pain and personal narratives.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Baseline
The proportion of eligible participants who agree to enrol in the study.
Baseline
Proportion of Participants Adhering to Intervention
Time Frame: Weekly from week 1 through 8
Intervention adherence will be assessed by the proportion of participants who attended at least 80% of the scheduled group sessions out of the total number randomized. Reasons for non-adherence will be explored through qualitative interviews with participants who did not meet the attendance threshold or discontinued the program prematurely.
Weekly from week 1 through 8
Acceptability of the Intervention-satisfaction
Time Frame: Weekly from week 1 through 8
Participants will rate their satisfaction with the program on a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied).
Weekly from week 1 through 8
Acceptability of the Intervention-perceived burden
Time Frame: Weekly from week 1 through 8
Participants will rate the perceived burden of the intervention on a scale from 0 (not demanding) to 10 (very demanding).
Weekly from week 1 through 8
Acceptability of the Intervention-willingness to continue
Time Frame: Weekly from week 1 through 8
Participants will rate their willingness to continue with the program on a scale from 0 (not willing to continue) to 10 (very willing to continue).
Weekly from week 1 through 8
Feasibility of data collection procedures
Time Frame: At 3-month post intervention

This outcome measure will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the data collection methods used in the study, including completion rates for outcome assessments.

Feasibility Metrics:

Completion Rates for Outcome Assessments: The number of completed assessments will be divided by the total number of scheduled assessments to calculate the completion rate.

At 3-month post intervention
Safety and Adverse Events of participants
Time Frame: Weekly from week 1 through 8

This outcome measure will document any adverse events or safety concerns that arise during the study, including:

Undesirable medical occurrences or problems that a participant experiences during or after the intervention, lasting more than 2 days and/or causing the participant to seek additional treatment.

These adverse events will be categorized into:

Serious Related Adverse Events Non-Serious Adverse Events

Safety Metrics:

Number and type of adverse events Proportion of participants who report serious related adverse events Proportion of participants who report non-serious adverse events

Weekly from week 1 through 8
Retention Rate of participants
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
The proportion of participants who complete the full study protocol.
Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Impression of Change scale
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and at the 3-month follow-up post-intervention
This is a complementary measure allows patients to self-report their impression of the overall change in their condition from the beginning of a study or intervention to the current time point. This provides a global, subjective evaluation of the patient's perceived improvement or worsening of their symptoms or health status. This item has a 7-point rating, with the following response options: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse.
Immediately post-intervention and at the 3-month follow-up post-intervention
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention
An 11-point scale measuring low back pain intensity, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Participants need to report their back pain in the current moment, in the last 24 hours and the last 3 months.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention

This 7-item Chinese version measures participants' psychological flexibility, rated on a 7-point scale, where higher scores indicate less flexibility.

AAQ-II has been cross-culturally adapted and validated among local adolescents and has demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and test-retest reliability

Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention

The Chinese version of this instrument measures HRQoL across five domains, providing insight into participants' overall well-being.It comprises 5 items related to mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each item has 5 response options (no problem', 'slight problems', 'moderate problems', 'severe problems', and 'extreme problems/unable to').

It has been found to useful in monitoring treatments' effects on HRQoL.

Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention
Roland Morris Disability Index (RMDQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention
The 24-item Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire assesses disability related to low back pain (LBP) in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater functional limitation and worse disability.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention
The 21-item Chinese version evaluates mental health across three domains, with higher scores indicating greater issues. It has been cross-culturally adapted to Hong Kong settings,demonstrating excellent internal consistency for depression, anxiety, and stress subscales.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 month follow up post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

August 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSEARS20250416004-01
  • 1-WZBS (Other Grant/Funding Number: Faculty Collaborative Research Scheme between Social Sciences and Health Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All personal data will be anonymized. The investigators will minimize the use of personal data in the study as much as possible. The data will be kept for 5 years after project completion, with limited access by Dr. Fadi Al Zoubi.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe