TWOSOME Trial: Single-Shot Versus Single-Tip Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation

September 8, 2025 updated by: Kars Neven, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus

Safety and Efficacy of New, Non-thermal Ablation Techniques for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation - A Comparison of Two Ablation Systems

Two non-thermal ablation techniques approved for routine clinical practice (CE-marked) for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation are compared in a 1:1 randomization to investigate patient data, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized 1:1 to undergo pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA) with either single-shot PFA (FARAPULSE) or single-tip PFA (Galvanize Therapeutics). Baseline characteristics, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were analyzed. In each group, a subset of consecutive patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging to assess silent cerebral lesions and was scheduled for biomarker assessment (blood sampling) to evaluate inflammation and troponin release after PFA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 45131
        • Alfried Krupp Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
  • Age > 18 years
  • Patient consen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the patient
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Life expectancy < 2 years
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding (due to radiation exposure)
  • History of left atrial ablation
  • Known macro-reentry or focal atrial tachycardia
  • Significant mitral valve stenosis
  • History of heart valve replacement or reconstruction
  • NYHA class III and IV
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%
  • Left atrial enlargement > 55 mm on echocardiography
  • Intracardiac thrombus prior to the procedure
  • Severe pulmonary disease with abnormal blood gases or requiring oxygen therapy
  • Renal insufficiency (GFR < 30 mL/min) due to contrast medium use
  • Stroke or TIA within the last 6 months
  • Symptomatic carotid stenosis
  • Active malignancy within the previous 24 months
  • Untreated or uncontrolled thyroid disease
  • Active bleeding or chronic bleeding tendency not amenable to curative treatment
  • Body mass index > 35 kg/m²
  • Contraindication to CT examination (e.g., contrast medium allergy or severe claustrophobia)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Single-Shot Pulsed Field Ablation
Single-Shot Pulsed Field Ablation is performed using the FARAPULSE PFA System
Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
A subset of consecutive patients of each group (n=25 of each group) receives cMRI on the day after the procedure to asses silent cerebral lesions. A control cMRI is scheduled in case of positive findings.
A subset of patients of each group (n=25 of each group) received blood tests to asses inflammation and troponine release.
Active Comparator: Single-Tip Pulsed Field Ablation
Single-Tip Pulsed Field Ablation is performed using a conventional ablation catheter in combination with a pulsed field ablation generator.
Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
A subset of consecutive patients of each group (n=25 of each group) receives cMRI on the day after the procedure to asses silent cerebral lesions. A control cMRI is scheduled in case of positive findings.
A subset of patients of each group (n=25 of each group) received blood tests to asses inflammation and troponine release.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome: Freedom from arrhythmia
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
The clinical efficacy, e.g. freedom from atrial arrhythmias / atrial fibrillation is assessed by 5-7 day Holter Monitoring at 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Any documented arrhythmia episode lasting >30s was calculated as failure. A three months blanking period was considered.
12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary outcomes: Complications, Silent cerebral lesions (cMRI) and biomarker assessments
Time Frame: 6 weeks
All peri-procedural complications were noted. In a subset of consecutive patients (n = 25 in each group), cerebral magnetic resonance tomography (cMRI) was performed on the day after the ablation procedure to assess silent cerebral lesions. In case of positive cMRI findings (e.g. silent lesion), repeat cMRI was scheduled in 6 weeks. Biomarker analyses were performed using blood samples, e.g. high-sensitive troponin release at 6, 24 and 48 hours after the ablation as a marker of myocardial injury and C-reactive proteine levels before and 24 hours after the ablation procedure to asses inflammatory response.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kars Neven, MD, PhD, Alfried Krupp Hospital
  • Study Director: Stefan Hartl, Alfried Krupp Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data are available upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after publication

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary vein isolation

Subscribe