Movement of Dental Implants During Osseointegration (MOVs-OI)

December 9, 2025 updated by: Guillem Esteve-Pardo, Aula Dental Avanzada

Do Dental Implants Move During Osseointegration? A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study Using Intraoral Scan Superimposition and Stability Analysis.

Prospective multicenter observational study assessing whether dental implants undergo three-dimensional positional change between placement (T0) and pre-loading after osseointegration (T1). Two intraoral scans (STL) will be superimposed to quantify linear (mm) and angular (degrees) displacement. Clinical variables include insertion torque, primary and secondary ISQ, anatomical site, placement timing, operator-perceived bone density (Lekholm & Zarb), bruxism, and night guard use. The primary endpoint is the 3D displacement at ~3-4 months. Multivariable analyses will explore associated factors.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a prospective multicenter observational study designed to evaluate whether dental implants undergo measurable three-dimensional positional changes during the osseointegration period. The study will be conducted in three private dental clinics in Spain, each led by an experienced implantologist. Consecutive adult patients indicated for a single implant-supported restoration will be enrolled after providing written informed consent.

Immediately after implant placement (T0), a reference intraoral scan (STL format) will be obtained using a validated scanner. A second intraoral scan will be performed after approximately 3 to 4 months, prior to prosthetic loading (T1). The two STL datasets will be superimposed using certified metrology software to calculate both linear (mm) and angular (degrees) displacement of the implant position relative to stable reference structures. The software alignment protocol ensures a reproducible and rigid registration of both scans.

Clinical and procedural variables collected at surgery include insertion torque value (ITV), primary implant stability (ISQ1), implant site (maxilla or mandible; anterior, premolar, or molar region), timing of placement (immediate or delayed), and operator-perceived bone density according to the Lekholm and Zarb classification. At the pre-loading visit (T1), secondary stability (ISQ2) will be recorded together with information on bruxism and the use of night guards.

The primary outcome is the 3D positional change (linear and angular) of the implant between T0 and T1. Secondary outcomes include the evolution of implant stability (ISQ2-ISQ1), correlations between displacement and insertion torque, and the influence of anatomical and patient-related variables (site, bone quality, bruxism, and loading protocol) on implant micromotion.

All data will be anonymized and analyzed at the implant level. Descriptive statistics will summarize means, standard deviations, and confidence intervals. Paired comparisons will be used to test within-subject changes, and multivariable linear regression models will explore predictors of displacement. Statistical significance will be set at p < 0.05.

The results of this study are expected to contribute to understanding whether clinically relevant implant micromovement occurs during osseointegration and to identify factors influencing this phenomenon, potentially guiding decisions on early loading and implant design optimization.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Guillem Esteve-Pardo, PhD

Study Locations

    • Alicante
      • Alicante, Alicante, Spain, 03001
        • Clínica Dental esteve
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guillem Esteve-Pardo, PhD
        • Contact:
    • Murcia
      • Cabezo de Torres, Murcia, Spain, 30110
        • Clínica Dental Sánchez Nicolás
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • José Antonio Sánchez-Nicolás, DDS
    • Tenerife
      • Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain, 38006
        • Clínica Dental García Marí
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Antonio Luis García-Marí, DDS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive adult patients in good general health who require a single dental implant-supported restoration in private clinical practice. Participants will be recruited from three collaborating dental clinics in Spain (Alicante, Murcia, and Tenerife). All candidates will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and will receive standard implant therapy under routine clinical conditions. Each participant contributes one implant, which constitutes the analytical unit of the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Indication for a single implant-supported restoration.
  • Good general health and absence of active periodontal disease.
  • Willingness to provide written informed consent and to undergo two intraoral scans (immediately after implant placement - T0 - and before prosthetic loading - T1).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled systemic disease or any medical condition contraindicating implant surgery.
  • High-risk antiresorptive therapy (e.g., intravenous bisphosphonates or denosumab).
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, if applicable to local policy.
  • Inability to attend the T1 follow-up visit or contraindication to intraoral scanning (e.g., limited mouth opening, severe gag reflex).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Adults receiving a single dental implant
Consecutive adults indicated for a single implant-supported restoration treated in three private clinics in Spain. Care follows standard practice; no investigational interventions are mandated. The exposure of interest is the osseointegration period between implant placement (T0) and pre-loading (T1, ~3-4 months). At T0 and T1, intraoral scans (STL) are acquired and rigidly superimposed with certified software to quantify 3D positional change (linear, mm; angular, degrees). Clinical variables recorded include insertion torque, ISQ1/ISQ2, anatomical site (jaw/region), placement timing (immediate/delayed), operator-perceived bone density, and bruxism/night-guard use. Analyses are performed at the implant level (one implant per participant).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3D positional change (linear and angular) from T0 to T1
Time Frame: 3-4 months post-placement (pre-loading visit).
Linear displacement (mm) and angular change (degrees) assessed by superimposing post-surgical (T0) and pre-loading (T1) intraoral STL scans using certified software.
3-4 months post-placement (pre-loading visit).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in implant stability (ISQ2 vs. ISQ1)
Time Frame: 3-4 months after implant placement (pre-loading visit).
Difference in implant stability values measured by resonance frequency analysis between placement (ISQ1) and pre-loading (ISQ2). The mean ISQ gain will be analyzed and correlated with the magnitude of 3D displacement.
3-4 months after implant placement (pre-loading visit).
Association between 3D displacement and insertion torque
Time Frame: 3-4 months after implant placement.
Evaluation of the correlation between linear and angular displacement (T0-T1) and the insertion torque value (ITV) recorded at implant placement. The aim is to determine whether higher primary mechanical stability predicts lower micromotion during osseointegration.
3-4 months after implant placement.
Proportion of implants with linear displacement >0.15 mm
Time Frame: 3-4 months after implant placement.
Percentage of implants showing a linear displacement greater than 0.15 mm between T0 and T1, considered an exploratory biological threshold of potential micromotion. Sensitivity analyses will also be conducted using alternative thresholds (0.10-0.20 mm).
3-4 months after implant placement.
Influence of anatomical, surgical, and patient-related variables on 3D displacement
Time Frame: 3-4 months after implant placement.
Multivariable analysis evaluating the influence of anatomical site (maxilla/mandible; anterior/premolar/molar), timing of placement (immediate/delayed), operator-perceived bone density (Lekholm & Zarb), and bruxism/night-guard use on 3D implant displacement.
3-4 months after implant placement.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified implant-level and patient-level data will be made available upon reasonable request after publication of the main study results. Shared materials will include the full dataset (excluding any directly identifying information), the data dictionary, and the main statistical analysis code. Access requests must be submitted in writing to the study sponsor (Clínica Dental Esteve, S.L.) and will be reviewed by the principal investigator to ensure compliance with ethical and privacy regulations. Data will be provided through a secure repository or encrypted transfer.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and for a minimum of 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers affiliated with academic or non-profit institutions may request access to de-identified implant-level and patient-level data, the data dictionary, and the main analysis code. Requests must include a brief research proposal and be submitted in writing to the study sponsor (Clínica Dental Esteve, S.L.). The principal investigator will review each request for scientific merit and ethical compliance. Approved users will sign a data use agreement and receive secure, time-limited access through an encrypted repository managed by the sponsor.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe