- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07373951
Retrospective Multicenter Study of Patient-level T1CE/FLAIR MRI Deep Learning to Predict EGFR/ALK Driver Status in NSCLC Brain Metastases With External Validation and Survival Analysis (DL-DriverBM)
Retrospective Multicenter Study: Patient-level Noninvasive Prediction of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases Based on T1CE and FLAIR Multimodal MRI Deep Learning Models, With Targeted Drivers (EGFR or ALK), External Validation, and Survival Translation Assessment.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Rationale and Objectives Actionable driver alterations such as EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements/fusions are key determinants of treatment selection in NSCLC. In patients with brain metastases, tissue acquisition may be limited by surgical risk, lesion location, and time constraints. Routine brain MRI provides rich phenotypic information that may capture imaging correlates of molecular drivers. This study is designed to develop and externally validate a patient-level deep learning model that leverages multimodal MRI (T1CE and FLAIR) to noninvasively identify driver-positive status (EGFR mutation and/or ALK rearrangement/fusion) versus driver-negative status (EGFR-negative and ALK-negative).
Study Design and Data Sources This is a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study. Model development (training and internal validation) will be performed using data from the National Cancer Center (China). External validation will be conducted in two independent cohorts: (1) a clinical cohort from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (China) and (2) a public de-identified cohort obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The TCIA cohort is used as an independent test set and is not involved in model training, hyperparameter tuning, or threshold selection.
Reference Standard and Driver Definition Driver status will be determined by next-generation sequencing performed on resected brain metastasis tissue. Driver-positive is defined as EGFR mutation and/or ALK rearrangement/fusion detected on brain metastasis tissue testing. Driver-negative is defined as both EGFR-negative and ALK-negative.
Imaging Inputs and Preprocessing Eligible patients must have preoperative brain MRI including at minimum T1CE and FLAIR sequences with acceptable image quality. Imaging data will be de-identified and standardized for analysis. Preprocessing will include harmonized spatial resampling to a common voxel spacing, intensity normalization, and co-registration between modalities when needed. Lesion localization/segmentation will be performed using manual, semi-automated, or automated approaches with quality control by trained reviewers, depending on data availability. For patients with multiple brain metastases, lesion-level representations will be aggregated to produce a patient-level prediction using a predefined pooling strategy (e.g., attention pooling or multiple-instance learning).
Model Development and External Validation The primary model will use multimodal inputs (T1CE + FLAIR) and a fusion strategy (including transformer-based fusion as a prespecified approach). Comparative analyses will evaluate 2D, 2.5D, and 3D modeling strategies and alternative fusion schemes (e.g., early vs late fusion) under a consistent evaluation framework. All model selection and threshold determination will be completed using the National Cancer Center development data. The finalized model and prespecified thresholds will then be locked and evaluated once in each external cohort without any additional training or recalibration.
Outcomes and Statistical Analysis The primary endpoint is discrimination performance assessed by patient-level AUC in the external test cohorts, with 95% confidence intervals. Secondary endpoints include sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), calibration (calibration curves and Brier score), and decision-curve analysis to estimate net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. Subgroup analyses may be performed by center, imaging acquisition characteristics, and single versus multiple metastases. In a subset with follow-up data, exploratory analyses will evaluate associations between model outputs and OS/PFS using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. OS and PFS will be calculated from the date of brain metastasis surgery to death/progression or last follow-up; the data cutoff date is May 1, 2026.
Ethics and Privacy This study uses retrospective clinical data that will be de-identified prior to analysis. Institutional review board approval and/or waiver of informed consent will be obtained as required by participating institutions. The TCIA cohort consists of public de-identified data and does not involve direct participant contact.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100021
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥ 18 years at the time of brain metastasis surgery. Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Brain metastasis treated with surgical resection (index date for survival analyses).
Preoperative brain MRI is available, including, at minimum, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1CE) and FLAIR.
EGFR and ALK status are available from next-generation sequencing (NCG/NGS) performed on resected brain metastasis tissue (+/-).
MRI quality sufficient for analysis (adequate brain coverage and no severe artifacts).
Exclusion Criteria:
Missing required MRI sequences (T1CE or FLAIR) or non-diagnostic image quality due to severe artifacts/motion.
Missing or unverifiable molecular testing results for EGFR and/or ALK from brain metastasis tissue.
Uncertain primary tumor origin or non-NSCLC histology. Prior intracranial therapy that substantially alters lesion appearance before the index MRI and cannot be reliably ascertained or adjusted for (e.g., radiotherapy immediately before the MRI), as determined by study investigators.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
National Cancer Center (NCC) Development Cohort
Retrospective cohort of NSCLC brain metastasis patients from the National Cancer Center (China) with preoperative brain MRI including T1CE and FLAIR and brain metastasis tissue NGS (NCG/NGS) results for EGFR and ALK.
This cohort is used for model development and internal validation, including prespecified threshold selection.
|
|
Anhui Medical University 1st Affiliated Hospital External Test Cohort
Independent retrospective external validation cohort from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (China) with preoperative T1CE and FLAIR MRI and brain metastasis tissue NGS results for EGFR and ALK.
No model training or threshold tuning is performed in this cohort; it is used for locked external testing.
|
|
TCIA Public External Test Cohort
Independent external validation cohort obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), consisting of de-identified public brain MRI data (including T1CE and FLAIR when available) from NSCLC brain metastasis patients.
This cohort is used only for locked external testing and is not involved in any model training, tuning, or threshold selection.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-level AUC for driver status (External Validation)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis through data cutoff (May 1, 2026)
|
The deep learning model uses preoperative brain MRI (T1CE and FLAIR) to output a patient-level probability of driver-positive status.
Performance will be evaluated primarily in two independent external test cohorts (First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University and TCIA).
AUC with 95% confidence intervals will be reported.
|
Retrospective analysis through data cutoff (May 1, 2026)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity and specificity at prespecified thresholds (External Validation)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis through May 1, 2026
|
Prespecified thresholds (e.g., screening-oriented high-sensitivity threshold and/or confirmation-oriented high-specificity threshold) will be determined using the National Cancer Center development cohort and then locked.
Sensitivity and specificity will be reported in external test cohorts.
|
Retrospective analysis through May 1, 2026
|
|
Predictive values (PPV/NPV) (External Validation)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis through May 1, 2026
|
PPV and NPV will be calculated in each external test cohort using the locked thresholds defined in the development cohort.
|
Retrospective analysis through May 1, 2026
|
|
Model calibration (External Validation)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis through May 1, 2026
|
Calibration of predicted probabilities will be evaluated in external test cohorts using calibration curves and Brier score (and/or calibration intercept/slope as applicable).
|
Retrospective analysis through May 1, 2026
|
|
Decision-curve analysis (Clinical utility)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis through May 1, 2026
|
Decision-curve analysis will be used to estimate clinical utility across a range of threshold probabilities, comparing model-guided triage strategies with default strategies (e.g., testing all vs testing none).
|
Retrospective analysis through May 1, 2026
|
|
Overall survival (OS) association (Exploratory)
Time Frame: From date of brain metastasis surgery to death or last follow-up (up to May 1, 2026)
|
OS will be defined from the date of brain metastasis surgery to death from any cause or last follow-up.
Exploratory analyses will evaluate associations between model outputs (continuous probability and/or risk groups) and OS using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models in the subset with available follow-up data.
|
From date of brain metastasis surgery to death or last follow-up (up to May 1, 2026)
|
|
Progression-free survival (PFS) association (Exploratory)
Time Frame: From date of brain metastasis surgery to progression/death or last follow-up (up to May 1, 2026)
|
PFS will be defined from the date of brain metastasis surgery to radiographic or clinical progression, death, or last follow-up.
Exploratory analyses will evaluate associations between model outputs (continuous probability and/or risk groups) and PFS using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models in the subset with available follow-up data.
|
From date of brain metastasis surgery to progression/death or last follow-up (up to May 1, 2026)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Mongan J, Moy L, Kahn CE Jr. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Mar 25;2(2):e200029. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020200029. eCollection 2020 Mar. No abstract available.
- Zwanenburg A, Vallieres M, Abdalah MA, Aerts HJWL, Andrearczyk V, Apte A, Ashrafinia S, Bakas S, Beukinga RJ, Boellaard R, Bogowicz M, Boldrini L, Buvat I, Cook GJR, Davatzikos C, Depeursinge A, Desseroit MC, Dinapoli N, Dinh CV, Echegaray S, El Naqa I, Fedorov AY, Gatta R, Gillies RJ, Goh V, Gotz M, Guckenberger M, Ha SM, Hatt M, Isensee F, Lambin P, Leger S, Leijenaar RTH, Lenkowicz J, Lippert F, Losnegard A, Maier-Hein KH, Morin O, Muller H, Napel S, Nioche C, Orlhac F, Pati S, Pfaehler EAG, Rahmim A, Rao AUK, Scherer J, Siddique MM, Sijtsema NM, Socarras Fernandez J, Spezi E, Steenbakkers RJHM, Tanadini-Lang S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC, Upadhaya T, Valentini V, van Dijk LV, van Griethuysen J, van Velden FHP, Whybra P, Richter C, Lock S. The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):328-338. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
- Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, Riley RD, Beam AL, Van Calster B, Ghassemi M, Liu X, Reitsma JB, van Smeden M, Boulesteix AL, Camaradou JC, Celi LA, Denaxas S, Denniston AK, Glocker B, Golub RM, Harvey H, Heinze G, Hoffman MM, Kengne AP, Lam E, Lee N, Loder EW, Maier-Hein L, Mateen BA, McCradden MD, Oakden-Rayner L, Ordish J, Parnell R, Rose S, Singh K, Wynants L, Logullo P. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
- Chadha, S., Sritharan, D., Dolezal, D., Chande, S., Hager, T., Bousabarah, K., Aboian, M., chiang, v., Lin, M., Nguyen, D., Aneja, S. (2025). MR Imaging and Segmentations with Matched Brain Biopsy Pathology Slides from Patients with Brain Metastases from Primary Lung Cancer (Brain-Mets-Lung-MRI-Path-Segs) (Version 2) [dataset]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/k0sm-y874
- Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P, Moore S, Phillips S, Maffitt D, Pringle M, Tarbox L, Prior F. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1045-57. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Lung Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
- Thoracic Neoplasms
- Lung Neoplasms
- Nervous System Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
- Bronchial Neoplasms
- Central Nervous System Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Brain Neoplasms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NCC-EGFR/ALK-DL
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
-
WindMIL TherapeuticsBristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Lung Cancer Metastatic | Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoAstraZenecaActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Healthy, no Evidence of Disease | Limited Stage Small Cell Lung... and other conditionsUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Gilead... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSmall-cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIGermany
-
University of California, DavisNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingNon Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIC | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer UnresectableUnited States
-
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of Cambridge; Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust; Institute... and other collaboratorsRecruitingNon Small Cell Lung Cancer | Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Locally Advanced NSCLC - Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Oncogene-addicted Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Early-stage Operable Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage 2/3 Operable Non Small Cell Lung CancerUnited Kingdom
-
Alexander ChiNot yet recruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Carcinoma | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIChina
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...Bristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Non-Squamous Non-Small...United States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalFood and Drug Administration (FDA)Active, not recruitingAdvanced Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer | Advanced Squamous Non Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Jiangxi Provincial People's HopitalNot yet recruitingNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer RecurrentChina