Children's Health, Respiratory Inflammation and Short-term Air Pollution (CHERISH)

June 12, 2026 updated by: Queen Mary University of London
The goal of this study is to see if physical activity in high air pollution is worse than rest in high air pollution.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The study will recruit a total of 330 children from 10 primary schools split into two groups: "higher pollution" and "lower pollution" schools. The team shall invite children in years 3 to 6 to take part in the study and consent will be provided by parents following information sheets sent home in school bags and parent evening presentations.

After the team have received written permission from parents. The study team will visit the school on two days. On the first day the study team will perform lung health assessment in a dedicated classroom. The assessment will involve, measuring children's height and weight, a breathing test (photo and a snot sample collected by squirting a small bit of saline water up one nostril and catching the snot in a cup.

Children will then take part in a PE lesson or a sedentary science lesson in a random order in their school playground while wearing activity monitors - like a Fitbit- to track their physical activity. The session is designed to be just like a typical outdoor science or PE lesson and will be exactly the same at all schools. Air pollution levels in the playground will be monitored during this time.

Once the PE lesson has finished the children will perform the same health assessment immediately after the lesson and again on a second day. The team shall compare the change in these scores between higher and lower pollution schools. The breathing tests will tell us if the has been any change in lung health and the snot samples will tell us about the pollution the children have breathed and how their bodies try to fight it. Participating will take about 4 hours total.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

330

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, E1 2AB
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Attending schools in Central and East London that have been recruited to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to engage with PE lessons on safety grounds, reported by their parents.
  • Children with learning or physical disabilities sufficient for them to be unable to give informed assent to the study, or to carry out study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Physical activity
PE Lesson
CHildren have a 90 minute PE lesson outdoors
Active Comparator: Sedenary
Science lesson
children have a 90 minute science lesson outdoors

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
"Airway resistance" measured by Oscillometry at R5
Time Frame: Pre-24 hour post exposure
measured as oscillometery R5
Pre-24 hour post exposure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
"Small airway resistance" measured by Oscillometry at R5-20
Time Frame: pre- 24 hour post exposure
Measured by oscillometry R5-20
pre- 24 hour post exposure
Immune responses as measured by Il6 in nasal lavage
Time Frame: pre-24 hour post exposure
Immune response as measured by Il6 in nasal lavage
pre-24 hour post exposure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James Scales, PhD, Queen Mary University London
  • Principal Investigator: Abigail Whitehouse, PhD, MD, QMUL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • QME25.1220
  • G-002887 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Barts Charity)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe