- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07452952
Relationship Between the Level of Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Venous Congestion During Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. (SURVEX)
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
All analyzes will be carried out with collection intention. All information required by the protocol is obtained from the clinical file of the Intensive care and Hyperbaric Medicine department of Angers University Hospital. This research is not involving humans on prospective data from care. This research does not require any specific investigation and does not involve no changes to support.
Clinical and biological data to be collected at inclusion (D1) :
- Demographic data: age, sex, weight (on the day of admission to intensive care and day of inclusion), medical history.
- Cause of ARDS.
- Ventilatory parameters: PEEP set by the clinician, total PEEP, Pplat, tidal volume, inspiratory and expiratory esophageal pressure if available as part of the treatment.
- Hemodynamic parameters: systolic, diastolic, mean aretrial blood pressure ; central venous pressure (if available as part of routine care); heart rate; transpulmonary thermodilution monitor data (if available as part of the routine care) or Swan-ganz catheter (if available as part of the routine care), vasoactive treatments (type and dosage).
Assessments to be carried out as part of routine care on D1, between D3 and D5 and between D6 and D8 :
Measures relating to the mechanics of the respiratory system:
- Measurement of airway opening pressure (AOP).
- Calculation of the R/I ratio (recruitability index)
- The two PEEP levels, high and low, chosen by the clinician for performing the following measurements.
At the two PEEP levels, the investigator will retrospectively collect the following clinical, biological, and echographic measurements, which were prospectively recorded by the clinician.
Cardiac ultrasound:
- Right ventricular function parameters (TAPSE, S' wave, Vmax IT, diameter VD).
- Cardiac output.
- LVEF (once only)
Evaluation of venous congestion by Doppler of the veins :
Venous congestion is initially assessed by studying each flow individually. Doppler (suprahepatic veins, renal interlobar veins and portal vein) and graded in "absent", "moderate" or "severe" as follows :
- Suprahepatic veins: S wave > D = absent (normal) ; S wave < D = moderate ; Positive S wave = severe
- Renal interlobar veins: Continuous flow = absent (normal) ; Biphasic flow = moderate ; Monophasic flow = severe
- Portal vein: Pulsatility index < 30% = absent (normal) ; Pulsatility index ≥ 30% and ≤ 50% = moderate ; Pulsatility index > 50% = severe NB : calculation of the portal trunk pulsatility index ([(Vmax - Vmin) / Vmax], average of 3 measurements)
Then the VExUS score, integrating these three signals as well as the study of the diameter of the inferior vena cavan by ultrasound, is calculated as follows:
- Grade 0 "absence of congestion": VCi < 20mm;
- Grade 1 "mild congestion": VCi ≥ 20 mm and suprahepatic venous Doppler, portal and renal normal or with signs of moderate congestion;
- Grade 2 "moderate congestion": VCi ≥ 20 mm and presence one venous flow (suprahepatic, portal, or renal) showing evidence of severe congestion;
Grade 3 "severe congestion": VCi ≥ 20 mm and presence of several flows vein showing signs of severe congestion.
- Arterial and central venous gasometry (ScVO 2, PaCO2, PvCO2, lactate, PaO2, pH).
- Collection of hemodynamic parameters: systolic blood pressure, mean, diastolic, heart rate, central venous pressure.
- In patients with a pulmonary artery catheter: data collection following: systolic, diastolic and average PAP, cardiac index
- Collection of ventilatory parameters: plateau pressure, total PEEP, and, if available, end-inspiratory and end-expiratory esophageal pressures.
Collection of renal function with:
- Serum creatinine and urea
- Creatininuria on urine ionogram
- 24-hour diuresis
- Collection of weight and input-output balance
- The echocardiographic data collected at inclusion and during follow-up will be processed a posteriori by two different observers.
End of monitoring data (D28):
During this visit, the following elements will be collected:
- Occurrence of acute renal failure (according to KDIGO criteria) on day 8.
- Use or not of extra-renal purification
- Survival at D28 (to characterize the population)
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Pierre ASFAR
- Phone Number: +33 241353637
- Email: pierre.asfar@chu-angers.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Pierre ASFAR
- Email: pierre.asfar@chu-angers.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Angers, France
- University Hospital of Angers
-
Contact:
- Pierre ASFAR
- Phone Number: +33 241353637
- Email: pierre.asfar@chu-angers.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients hospitalized in the Medical Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine Unit of Angers University Hospital, receiving mechanical ventilation in assist-control mode (A/C ventilation), and presenting with ARDS as defined by the following criteria (1):
- Hypoxemia with a PaO₂ (mmHg)/FiO₂ (0.21 to 1.0) ratio <300 mmHg with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥5 cmH₂O;
- Pulmonary edema not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload;
- Presence of bilateral pulmonary opacities on chest imaging not fully explained by pleural effusions, atelectasis, or pulmonary nodules.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Minor patient (<18 years old)
- ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation)
- Hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg)
- Respiratory instability (SpO₂ <90% under FiO₂ >90%)
- Severe organic tricuspid regurgitation
- Congenital heart disease
- Pneumothorax
- Renal or hepatic transplant recipient
- Liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh C
- Portal vein thrombosis or Budd-Chiari syndrom
- Abdominal compartment syndrome documented by intra-abdominal pressure ≥20 mmHg
- Pregnant, breastfeeding, or peripartum women
- Persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Persons subject to compulsory psychiatric care
- Persons under legal protective measures
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ARDS (Acute respiratory distress syndrome)
Patient with ARDS who are placed on mechanical ventilation
|
Non-interventionnal study
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evolution of the level of venous congestion evaluated on the different abdominal Doppler venous flows (portal, suprahepatic and renal venous Doppler) and on the VExUS score between the different levels of PEEP (high and low)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The evolution of venous congestion between two PEEP levels (high and low), assessed by analyzing each Doppler flow individually (hepatic veins, renal interlobar veins, and portal vein) and grading them as 'absent,' 'moderate,' or 'severe,' as well as by the VExUS score, graded from 0 to 3.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
In patients with a pulmonary artery catheter: evolution between venous congestion in abdominal venous flow and the VExUS score with right heart pressures (systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary arterial pressure at D1, D3-D5 and D6-D8)
Time Frame: From Baseline to day 8
|
Measurement of pulmonary pressures (PAPs, PAPm, PAPd, PAPO) via Swan-Ganz catheters at each PEEP level (high and low)
|
From Baseline to day 8
|
|
Evaluate the evolution of venous congestion (VExUS score) according to the PEEP level over time (D1, D3-D5 and D6-D8) for each patient individually
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 8
|
From baseline to Day 8
|
|
|
Evaluate the evolution of venous congestion in abdominal venous flows and the VExUS score according to PEEP level
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 8
|
From baseline to Day 8
|
|
|
Incidence of acute renal failure at day 28 in patients with markers of significant venous congestion
Time Frame: From baseline to day 28
|
Vexus score greater than or equal to 2 and/or change in portal flow, renal venous flow, or suprahepatic venous flow
|
From baseline to day 28
|
|
Incidence of renal replacement therapy on day 28 in patients with markers of significant venous congestion
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 28
|
Description: score greater than or equal to 2 and/or change in portal flow, renal venous flow, or suprahepatic venous flow
|
From baseline to Day 28
|
|
Evolution of the level of venous congestion evaluated on the different abdominal Doppler venous flows (portal, suprahepatic and renal venous Doppler) and on the VExUS score between the different levels of PEEP (high and low)
Time Frame: from day 3 to day 5
|
The evolution of venous congestion between two PEEP levels (high and low), assessed by analyzing each Doppler flow individually (hepatic veins, renal interlobar veins, and portal vein) and grading them as 'absent,' 'moderate,' or 'severe,' as well as by the VExUS score, graded from 0 to 3.
|
from day 3 to day 5
|
|
Evolution of the level of venous congestion evaluated on the different abdominal Doppler venous flows (portal, suprahepatic and renal venous Doppler) and on the VExUS score between the different levels of PEEP (high and low)
Time Frame: From Day 6 to Day 8
|
The evolution of venous congestion between two PEEP levels (high and low), assessed by analyzing each Doppler flow individually (hepatic veins, renal interlobar veins, and portal vein) and grading them as 'absent,' 'moderate,' or 'severe,' as well as by the VExUS score, graded from 0 to 3.
|
From Day 6 to Day 8
|
|
Evolution between venous congestion in abdominal venous flow and the VExUS score and echocardiographic markers of right heart function (D1, D3-D5 and D6-D8)
Time Frame: From baseline to day 8
|
Measurement of TAPSE (Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion), tricuspid S' wave, peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity at each PEEP level (high and low)
|
From baseline to day 8
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Pierre ASFAR, University Hospital of Angers
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Grasselli G, Calfee CS, Camporota L, Poole D, Amato MBP, Antonelli M, Arabi YM, Baroncelli F, Beitler JR, Bellani G, Bellingan G, Blackwood B, Bos LDJ, Brochard L, Brodie D, Burns KEA, Combes A, D'Arrigo S, De Backer D, Demoule A, Einav S, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Frat JP, Gattinoni L, Guerin C, Herridge MS, Hodgson C, Hough CL, Jaber S, Juffermans NP, Karagiannidis C, Kesecioglu J, Kwizera A, Laffey JG, Mancebo J, Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Mercat A, Meyer NJ, Moss M, Munshi L, Myatra SN, Ng Gong M, Papazian L, Patel BK, Pellegrini M, Perner A, Pesenti A, Piquilloud L, Qiu H, Ranieri MV, Riviello E, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Summers C, Thompson TB, Valente Barbas CS, Villar J, Ware LB, Weiss B, Zampieri FG, Azoulay E, Cecconi M; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Taskforce on ARDS. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
- Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
- Li G, Malinchoc M, Cartin-Ceba R, Venkata CV, Kor DJ, Peters SG, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O. Eight-year trend of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan 1;183(1):59-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201003-0436OC. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 49RC26_0031
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mechanical Ventilation
-
Thammasat UniversityCompletedProlonged Mechanical Ventilation | Home Mechanical VentilationThailand
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedWeaning Failure | Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation | Mechanical VentilationEgypt
-
Sanatorio Parque, ArgentinaNot yet recruitingMechanical Ventilation Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation Extubation Failure Critical IllnessArgentina
-
Jose Ivan Rodriguez de Molina SerranoCompletedMechanical Ventilation Complication | Mechanical Power | Driving Pressure | Lung Protective VentilationMexico
-
Rabin Medical CenterUnknownMechanical Ventilation | Weaning | Prolonged Ventilation
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...University of Zurich; Dijklander Ziekenhuis; Reinier de Graaf GroepCompletedMechanical Ventilation | Mechanical PowerNetherlands
-
Hospital do CoracaoNot yet recruitingWeaning Failure | Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation | Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation, Extubation
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCentre Hospitalier Régional Metz-ThionvilleNot yet recruitingHypnosis | Weaning Mechanical Ventilation | Hypnosis During Weaning From Invasive Mechanical VentilationFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingMechanical Ventilation | Mechanical Ventilator WeaningFrance
-
Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaAUniversity of Göttingen; Prof. Dr. med. ImhoffSuspendedMechanical Ventilation | Ventilation Perfusion MismatchGermany
Clinical Trials on Non-interventionnal study
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCRecruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System NeoplasmUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteRecruitingCigarette Smoking-Related CarcinomaUnited States
-
Children's Oncology GroupNot yet recruitingChildhood Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm | Childhood Malignant Solid Neoplasm
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterAmerican Association for Cancer ResearchRecruitingAnatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Breast Carcinoma | Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System NeoplasmUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingEndometrial CarcinomaUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingBreast CarcinomaUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingLung Non-Small Cell CarcinomaUnited States
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingProstate CarcinomaUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System NeoplasmUnited States