System-integrated Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening (SPRING)

April 7, 2026 updated by: Kristina Lång, Region Skane
To assess the feasibility, safety, and clinical performance of community-based breast cancer screening incorporating clinical breast exam and short-termed trained examiners performing AI-supported breast POCUS for triage in limited-resource settings.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Following awareness campaign, asymptomatic and symptomatic women are invited to breast cancer screening. The screening intervention consists initially of clinical breast exam (CBE). Those that are positive at CBE or that present with symptoms are further examined with targeted artificial intelligence (AI)-supported breast point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) on the complaint site. The AI-supported POCUS is performed by clinical nurses or clinical officers that have undergone a short training program and certification process in POCUS examination. In the first stage of the study, the same women will also be examined by an expert on site (breast radiologist). If clinical safety can be determined, the second stage of the study will start in which expert radiologist will not be on site. Ultrasound images will be assessed by breast radiologists that will serve as reference standard (on site in stage 1 and remotely in stage 2). Women positive at POCUS triage (positive ultrasound finding or with predefined alarming clinical symptoms) will be referred to further follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

4800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Gamo Zone
      • Arba Minch, Gamo Zone, Ethiopia
        • Recruiting
        • Arba Minch University and health care facilities and markets in the Gamo Zone
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Asymptomatic women from the age of 30 with no upper age limit
  • Symptomatic women 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals unable to comprehend the study information due to language barriers or cognitive impairments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CBE follow by targeted AI-supported POCUS
In the first stage, an expert breast radiologist will be involved on site and in the second stage, remotely.
AI-supported POCUS for triage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: Estimated 2 months (from enrollment until sufficient number of positive participants according to expert assessment)
The primary endpoint is sensitivity, defined as the proportion of diseased women correctly classified as positive by non-experts using AI-supported POCUS. Expert breast radiologists will be used as reference standard
Estimated 2 months (from enrollment until sufficient number of positive participants according to expert assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity
Time Frame: 2 months
Proportion of non-diseased participants correctly classified as negative
2 months
Positive Predictive Value
Time Frame: 2 months
Proportion of diseased participants of those referred for further workup
2 months
Negative Predictive Value
Time Frame: 2 months
Proportion of true negatives among all negative results.
2 months
Cancer Detection Rate
Time Frame: 2 months
Proportion of women with detected cancer among all screened women
2 months
Recall Rate
Time Frame: 2 months
Proportion of women triaged to further work up
2 months
False Positive Rate
Time Frame: 2 months
Proportion of participants triaged for work up with no detected cancer among all screened participants.
2 months
Optimal threshold analysis
Time Frame: 2 months
Sensitivity and specificity at the point minimizing distance to (0,1) on the ROC curve.
2 months
Cancer characterstics
Time Frame: 6 months
Distribution of cancer stage and histological type among detected cancers.
6 months
Breast cancer in stage I-II
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of breast cancer in stage I-II compared to historical standard-of-care data (2021-2025).
12 months
WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative key performance indicators
Time Frame: 12 months

Proportion of participants with cancer in relation to the WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative key performance indicators ( ≥60% of breast cancers diagnosed at stage I-II, ≤60 days from first presentation to diagnosis

≥80% completion of recommended treatment).

12 months
Receiver Operating Characteristic and Area Under the Curve
Time Frame: 2 months
Based on the AI-generated probability score (0-1), using standard ROC analysis
2 months
Usability and Acceptability
Time Frame: 2 months
Reported usability and acceptability of the AI-supported POCUS system: qualitative measure based on questionnaires (standard usability scale 1-5 and proportion of technical issues (y/n)).
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristina KL Lån g, MD PhD, Lund University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 23, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to data privacy. Could be considered following regulatory approvals.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on AI

Subscribe