Barrier-Step Action in Elite Futsal Goalkeepers (BARRIER-STEP-F)

April 20, 2026 updated by: Édison Andrés Pérez Bedoya, Federal University of Vicosa

Temporal Organisation and Projected Two-Dimensional Kinematics of the Barrier-Step Action in Elite Futsal Goalkeepers: An Observational Case Series

This observational case series examined the barrier-step action in elite futsal goalkeepers. The aim was to describe how this goalkeeper-specific defensive movement was organised in time and how selected body angles were configured during execution. Three male professional futsal goalkeepers with international experience each performed three valid dominant-side trials under standardised indoor conditions. The task involved responding to a standardised low ball stimulus delivered by the coach from the penalty mark at a distance of 5 m.

Video data were recorded using a GoPro Hero 10 camera operating at 240 frames per second and analysed frame by frame in Kinovea. The movement was segmented into three operational intervals: initiation-propulsion, lateral transfer, and terminal support-stabilisation. Projected shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle angles were extracted at two analytically defined instants: the end of Interval 1 and the blocking configuration reached during Interval 2. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise between-goalkeeper variation and within-goalkeeper consistency in the barrier-step action.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was designed as an exploratory descriptive observational case series aimed at characterising selected projected two-dimensional kinematic features of the barrier-step action in elite futsal goalkeepers. Given the limited biomechanical description of this goalkeeper-specific defensive movement, the purpose was to provide an initial field-based account of its temporal organisation and selected joint-angle configurations rather than to test inferential hypotheses.

Three male professional futsal goalkeepers with international representation were purposively recruited. Each participant completed three valid dominant-side trials in response to a standardised low ball stimulus delivered by the coach from the penalty mark at a distance of 5 m. To reduce between-trial variability in the initial condition, each repetition began with a standardised movement towards the opposite post. The analytical sequence began only after completion of this manoeuvre.

All trials were recorded using a GoPro Hero 10 camera operating at 240 frames per second. The camera was mounted on a tripod at a height of 0.9 m and positioned 6 m from the movement area, with the optical axis aligned as closely as possible to the primary plane of motion. Because the study relied on single-camera two-dimensional video analysis, all outputs were interpreted as projected image-plane measures rather than true three-dimensional joint kinematics.

For analytical purposes, the movement was segmented into three operational intervals: initiation-propulsion, lateral transfer, and terminal support-stabilisation. Angular variables were extracted at two analytical instants: the end of Interval 1 and the blocking configuration reached during Interval 2. The projected angular variables were shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle angles. Temporal variables included the duration of each operational interval. Video analysis was performed frame by frame in Kinovea by a single investigator, and intra-rater reliability was assessed by repeated analysis after a 7-day interval. Descriptive statistics were used throughout to characterise temporal organisation, angular configuration, and between-goalkeeper variation in the barrier-step action.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antioquia
      • Guarne, Antioquia, Colombia, 054080
        • Tecnológico de Antioquia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Elite male professional futsal goalkeepers with international experience who underwent a single-session standardised biomechanical assessment of the barrier-step action.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male futsal goalkeeper
  • Competing at professional level
  • International competitive experience
  • Able to perform the standardised barrier-step assessment task under indoor conditions
  • Able to complete three valid dominant-side trials
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to meet the inclusion criteria
  • Inability to complete the standardised assessment task
  • Inability to complete three valid dominant-side trials
  • Video recordings in which the full movement sequence or required analytical landmarks could not be identified frame by frame

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Elite futsal goalkeepers
Male professional futsal goalkeepers with international experience who completed three valid dominant-side trials of the barrier-step action under standardised indoor conditions.
Participants performed the barrier-step action in response to a standardised low ball stimulus delivered by the coach from the penalty mark at a distance of 5 m. Each participant completed three valid dominant-side trials under standardised indoor conditions, and the movement was analysed using single-camera two-dimensional video.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interval-specific temporal organisation of the barrier-step action
Time Frame: Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021
Duration of initiation-propulsion, lateral transfer, and terminal support-stabilisation, expressed in seconds and derived from frame-by-frame analysis of 240-Hz video recordings.
Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021
Projected joint-angle configuration during the barrier-step action
Time Frame: Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021, at analytical instant 1 and analytical instant 2
Projected shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle angles extracted from two analytically defined instants: the end of Interval 1 and the blocking configuration reached during Interval 2.
Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021, at analytical instant 1 and analytical instant 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative temporal contribution of each movement interval
Time Frame: Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021
Percentage contribution of Interval 1, Interval 2, and Interval 3 to total sequence duration.
Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021
Angular change from Interval 1 to Interval 2
Time Frame: Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021, from analytical instant 1 to analytical instant 2
Change in projected ankle, knee, hip, and shoulder angles from the end of Interval 1 to the blocking configuration reached during Interval 2.
Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021, from analytical instant 1 to analytical instant 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • White A, Hills SP, Cooke CB, Batten T, Kilduff LP, Cook CJ, Roberts C, Russell M. Match-Play and Performance Test Responses of Soccer Goalkeepers: A Review of Current Literature. Sports Medicine. 2018;48(11):2497-2516. doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0977-2
  • Ibrahim R, Kingma I, De Boode VA, Faber GS, Van Dieën JH. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of the goalkeeper's diving save in football. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019;37(3):313-321. doi:10.1080/02640414.2018.1499413
  • Colyer SL, Evans M, Cosker DP, Salo AIT. A Review of the Evolution of Vision-Based Motion Analysis and the Integration of Advanced Computer Vision Methods Towards Developing a Markerless System. Sports Medicine - Open. 2018;4(1):24. doi:10.1186/s40798-018-0139-y

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TDEA-BARRIERSTEP-2026-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the reported temporal and projected angular outcomes will be shared, including interval-specific time data, projected shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle angles at the two analytical instants, relative temporal contribution of each interval, and angular change from Interval 1 to Interval 2. Raw video files will not be shared in order to protect participant confidentiality and identity.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified individual participant data, the study protocol, and analytic code will be available beginning 3 months after publication and for 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified individual participant data underlying the reported temporal and projected angular outcomes, together with the study protocol and analytic code, will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Requests must describe a scientifically sound secondary analysis and will be reviewed for scientific merit, feasibility, and consistency with ethical and confidentiality restrictions. Raw video files will not be shared in order to protect participant confidentiality and identity.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sport Performance, Professional Overhead Athletes

Clinical Trials on Standardised barrier-step assessment task

Subscribe