Addressing Food Access and Physical Activity to Improve Diabetes Prevention Outcomes Among Underserved African Americans

April 24, 2026 updated by: Jenifer Allsworth, University of Missouri, Kansas City

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an enhanced, culturally, socially, and structurally tailored Diabetes Prevention Program (E-DPP) can improve weight loss and related diabetes risk factors in African American adults with prediabetes living in low-income, socially vulnerable communities.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the enhanced DPP (E-DPP) lead to greater percent weight loss at 6 and 12 months compared to the standard culturally tailored DPP (S-DPP)?
  • How do social determinants (e.g., food insecurity, stigma, access to resources) influence weight loss and engagement in lifestyle behaviors?

Researchers will compare a standard culturally tailored DPP (S-DPP) to an enhanced DPP (E-DPP) to see if improving access to healthy food, physical activity, and community resources increases weight loss and improves diabetes-related outcomes.

Participants will

  1. Attend DPP sessions delivered in community settings (e.g., churches)
  2. Receive lifestyle education focused on diet, physical activity, and weight loss
  3. Engage in physical activity (including in-class exercise sessions [E-DPP only] and community-based options)
  4. Receive support for healthy eating, including food deliveries ([E-DPP only]), food selection guidance, and referrals to food assistance programs
  5. Receive information and support for accessing community resources for food and physical activity

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a cluster-randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced, culturally, socially, and structurally tailored Diabetes Prevention Program (E-DPP) compared to a standard culturally tailored DPP (S-DPP) among African American adults with prediabetes residing in low-income, socially vulnerable communities. The trial will enroll approximately 408 participants across 12 community-based sites (churches), which will be randomized to deliver either S-DPP or E-DPP to minimize contamination across intervention conditions.

Both intervention arms are grounded in the evidence-based DPP lifestyle intervention and incorporate cultural tailoring strategies to improve relevance and acceptability in African American communities. The enhanced intervention builds upon this foundation by explicitly addressing multilevel social determinants that influence engagement in healthy eating and physical activity. Specifically, E-DPP integrates structural supports to improve access to healthy foods and safe, low-cost physical activity opportunities, alongside strategies to address social stigma related to obesity, poverty, and food insecurity.

The E-DPP includes additional components delivered during and between sessions. These include provision of fruits and vegetables during sessions, experiential activities focused on healthy food selection and budgeting, and facilitated linkage to community food resources such as food pantries and assistance programs. Physical activity support includes structured in-session exercise and guidance on accessing community-based physical activity programs. Participants in the E-DPP arm will also receive tailored text messaging designed to reinforce behavior change, promote utilization of community resources, and reduce stigma-related barriers to engagement.

The intervention is delivered over a 12-month period, with assessments conducted at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. A community-engaged approach informs intervention design and implementation, ensuring alignment with local context and resources. The study is guided by theoretical frameworks that emphasize the role of social and structural determinants in shaping health behaviors and outcomes.

In addition to evaluating intervention effects, the study will examine potential mediators and moderators of weight loss, including social determinant-related stressors, access to resources, and psychosocial factors. A concurrent process evaluation will assess intervention fidelity, dose, participant engagement, acceptability, and feasibility, as well as cost-related considerations. These data will inform identification of key intervention components and support future scalability and dissemination of the enhanced program in underserved communities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

408

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
        • University of Missouri-Kansas City
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Members of a participating church or user of a participating church's outreach services
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Prediabetic (score of 5 or higher in the National Diabetes Prevention Program Risk Score or ([body mass index > 24 or history of gestational diabetes] and (5.7-6.4 A1v, 100-125 mg/dL fasting plasma glucose, or 140-149 mg/dL oral glucose tolerance test)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant in the next year
  • Individuals with unsafe blood pressure levels (160 systolic or higher or 100 diastolic or higher) without a medical clearance firn
  • Individuals who are not able to engage in low-impact physical activity
  • Individuals who do not speak English
  • Individuals who live in a household with a participant in this study at a different church

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Diabetes Prevention Program (S-DPP)
Standard DPP (S-DPP) is a 12-month, in-person lifestyle intervention based on the CDC PreventT2 curriculum, delivered by community peer coaches across 22 sessions (16 core, 6 maintenance). Coaches conduct pre-program outreach and a pre-session addressing diabetes disparities, goal setting, and attendance barriers. Each session includes weigh-ins with REDCap capture, review of self-monitoring logs for diet, activity, and goals, and guided delivery of the curriculum. Participants receive Wi-Fi scales and fitness trackers to support weight loss and physical activity tracking. Certain sessions provide information on local, low- or no-cost food and physical activity resources to support and maintain behavior change.
This intervention adapts the CDC PreventT2 Diabetes Prevention Program into two 12-month delivery models led by community peer coaches with student support across 22 sessions (16 core, 6 maintenance). Both arms include pre-program outreach, a pre-session addressing diabetes disparities, goal setting and barrier identification, structured sessions with weigh-ins captured in REDCap, review of self-monitoring logs, and guided curriculum delivery. Participants use Wi-Fi scales and fitness trackers to support behavior change. The enhanced arm adds tailored text messaging, resource navigation, food access supports, and culturally tailored physical activity to address barriers and improve engagement and sustainability.
Experimental: Enhanced Diabetes Prevention Program (E-DPP)
Enhanced DPP (E-DPP) is a 12-month intervention based on the CDC PreventT2 curriculum that integrates digital tools, community resources, and culturally tailored supports across 22 sessions (16 core, 6 maintenance). Coaches conduct pre-program outreach and a pre-session addressing diabetes disparities, goal setting, and attendance barriers. Sessions include weigh-ins with REDCap capture, review of self-monitoring logs, and guided curriculum delivery. Participants receive Wi-Fi scales and fitness trackers and access tailored text messages with DPP content and resource links. Coaches provide additional messaging support. The model also includes in-class healthy food distribution and culturally tailored physical activity sessions, as well as information on local low- or no-cost resources to support sustained behavior change.
This intervention adapts the CDC PreventT2 Diabetes Prevention Program into two 12-month delivery models led by community peer coaches with student support across 22 sessions (16 core, 6 maintenance). Both arms include pre-program outreach, a pre-session addressing diabetes disparities, goal setting and barrier identification, structured sessions with weigh-ins captured in REDCap, review of self-monitoring logs, and guided curriculum delivery. Participants use Wi-Fi scales and fitness trackers to support behavior change. The enhanced arm adds tailored text messaging, resource navigation, food access supports, and culturally tailored physical activity to address barriers and improve engagement and sustainability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight loss
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Percent weight loss measured as percent change in weight (in pounds) from baseline at 6 and 12 months
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nutrition security
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Self-reported nutrition security
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Dietary intake
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Self-reported dietary quality that assesses alignment with US dietary guidelines
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
DPP Attendance
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of DPP sessions attended
6 months
Physical activity (subjective)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Self-reported physical activity
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Physical activity (objective)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Physical activity measured by accelerometer
Baseline, 6 months
Use of community resources for food access
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Self-reported use of food access community resources
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Use of community resources for physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Self-reported use of physical activity community resources
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Measured systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Glycosylated hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Measured A1c categorized via American Diabetes Association guidelines
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Food security
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Self-reported measure of household food security
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jenifer E Jenifer, PhD, University of Missouri, Kansas City

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 4, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified study data for participants will be shared in an NIH-approved repository or made available by request from the PIs.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be shared within 12 months of study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data will be available to researchers who sign a data use agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Culturally-tailored, enhanced adaption of Diabetes Prevention Program

Subscribe