Effects of Different Doses of Caffeine on Physical and Cognitive Performance in Female Handball Players

April 24, 2026 updated by: Ulaş Can YILDIRIM, Sinop University

Dose-Dependent Effects of Acute Caffeine Ingestion on Physical and Cognitive Performance in Female Handball Players: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

This study investigates how different doses of caffeine affect physical and cognitive performance in female handball players. Caffeine is widely used as a performance-enhancing substance, but its effects may vary depending on the type of performance and the dose consumed.

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, participants complete three experimental conditions: placebo, low-dose caffeine (3 mg/kg), and moderate-dose caffeine (6 mg/kg). Each participant receives all conditions in a randomized order, with sufficient time between sessions to avoid carryover effects.

The study evaluates three main performance domains relevant to team sports. Physical performance is assessed using an intermittent running test. Cognitive performance is measured using a reaction time task that evaluates attention and inhibitory control. In addition, a throwing test is used to assess sport-specific motor performance.

The main objective is to determine whether caffeine produces dose-dependent improvements and whether these effects differ across physical, cognitive, and technical performance domains. The findings aim to provide practical insights for athletes and coaches regarding optimal caffeine use in team sport settings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Caffeine is one of the most widely consumed ergogenic aids in sport, known to influence both physiological and cognitive processes primarily through antagonism of adenosine receptors. Although its beneficial effects on endurance performance and alertness are well established, evidence regarding its effects on cognitive control and sport-specific technical skills remains inconsistent, particularly in team sport settings where multiple performance domains interact.

Team sports such as handball require the integration of intermittent high-intensity physical efforts, rapid decision-making, and precise motor execution. These components are not independent; instead, they compete for shared neurocognitive resources, especially under conditions of fatigue. As a result, interventions such as caffeine supplementation may exert domain-specific effects rather than uniform improvements across all aspects of performance.

Despite extensive research on caffeine, most studies have examined either physical or cognitive outcomes in isolation. Furthermore, dose-response relationships remain unclear, with previous findings suggesting that lower doses may be sufficient to enhance physical performance, whereas cognitive outcomes may require higher levels of stimulation. However, limited evidence exists on whether these dose-dependent effects are maintained when multiple performance domains are assessed within the same experimental framework.

The present study addresses this gap by simultaneously evaluating physical, cognitive, and sport-specific motor performance following different doses of caffeine in female handball players. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design is used to minimize inter-individual variability and improve internal validity. Participants complete three experimental conditions (placebo, low-dose caffeine, and moderate-dose caffeine), each separated by an adequate washout period to reduce potential carryover effects.

The protocol includes standardized procedures to control for confounding factors such as time of day, environmental conditions, and prior physical activity. Testing sessions follow a fixed sequence, beginning with cognitive assessment, followed by a sport-specific throwing task, and concluding with an intermittent running test. This structure is designed to reflect the multi-component demands of team sport performance while maintaining methodological control.

The primary objective is to determine whether caffeine produces dose-dependent effects across different performance domains. Specifically, the study examines whether physical performance improvements occur at lower doses, whether cognitive performance shows greater sensitivity to higher doses, and whether technical motor performance responds differently to caffeine ingestion. By integrating these domains within a single experimental design, the study aims to provide a more ecologically valid understanding of caffeine's ergogenic effects in team sport contexts.

The findings are expected to contribute to evidence-based recommendations for caffeine use in athletes, emphasizing the importance of aligning supplementation strategies with specific performance goals rather than assuming uniform benefits across all domains.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Central
      • Sinop, Central, Turkey (Türkiye), 57100
        • Sinop University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female handball players
  • Regular participation in competitive handball training
  • Minimum of 3 years of handball training experience
  • Free from musculoskeletal injury within the past 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known caffeine sensitivity or allergy
  • Use of medications or supplements that may affect physical or cognitive performance
  • Presence of cardiovascular disease
  • Presence of metabolic disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Condition
Participants receive placebo capsules prior to testing in a randomized
Ingestion of identical capsules containing polydextrose with no active ingredient, administered 60 minutes prior to testing.
Experimental: Low-Dose Caffeine
Participants receive 3 mg/kg caffeine prior to testing in a randomized
Acute ingestion of caffeine at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body mass, administered in capsule form 60 minutes prior to testing.
Experimental: Moderate-Dose Caffeine
Participants receive 6 mg/kg caffeine prior to testing in a randomized
Acute ingestion of caffeine at a dose of 6 mg per kilogram of body mass, administered in capsule form 60 minutes prior to testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Flanker Task Reaction Time
Time Frame: During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)
Mean reaction time (ms) during correct trials in the Simplified Eriksen Flanker task, used to assess cognitive processing speed.
During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)
Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 Distance
Time Frame: During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)
Total distance covered during the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1, used to assess intermittent running performance.
During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)
Throwing Velocity
Time Frame: During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)
Mean ball velocity (km/h) measured during a standardized handball throwing test.
During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Flanker Task Accuracy
Time Frame: During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)
Percentage of correct responses in the Simplified Eriksen Flanker task.
During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)
Flanker Effect
Time Frame: During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)
Difference in reaction time between incongruent and congruent trials in the Flanker task.
During each experimental session (60 minutes after supplementation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

At the time of registration, a decision regarding sharing individual participant data (IPD) has not yet been finalized. The study dataset is currently being prepared for publication and institutional archiving. Future data sharing will be considered after publication, taking into account institutional policies, ethical approvals, and participant confidentiality requirements. If appropriate, de-identified data underlying the published results may be made available upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Athletic Performance

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe