Sensitivity and Tests for Evaluation of Plantar Fasciopathy (STEP)

April 28, 2026 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Plantar fasciopathy (PF), one of the leading causes of foot pain, affects up to one in ten individuals in their lifetime. Characterized by pain and structural alterations at the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia on the calcaneus, the term "PF" has replaced "plantar fasciitis," as degenerative tissue changes predominate over inflammatory processes.

The pathogenesis of PF remains incompletely understood but appears to involve the gastrocnemius muscle, which is part of an integrated biomechanical unit including the calcaneus and the plantar fascia. Diagnosis is primarily based on clinical history and physical examination, while imaging modalities such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assist in excluding differential diagnoses. A simple clinical test to distinguish PF from other causes of heel pain, such as plantar fat pad syndrome or Baxter's nerve entrapment, could improve diagnostic efficiency.

Given the biomechanical relationship between the Achilles tendon and the plantar fascia, and their shared association with gastrocnemius tightness, a clinical test adapted from Achilles tendon assessment may be useful for diagnosing PF. In 2003, the Royal London Hospital proposed a diagnostic approach for Achilles tendinopathy based on pain reduction during active ankle dorsiflexion, which reduces tension in the tendon. The same concept could be applied, with appropriate modifications, to PF.

The present study aims to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and predictive value of localized tenderness at the medial calcaneal tuberosity and of a modified version of the Royal London Hospital Test in patients with PF. Secondarily, it will assess the reproducibility and prevalence of the Silfverskiöld test, supporting the concept of a biomechanical unit involving the triceps surae, calcaneus, and plantar fascia.

Aim of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and predictive value of tenderness at the medial calcaneal tuberosity and of a modified version of the Royal London Hospital Test in patients presenting with clinical signs of PF. The modified version of the Royal London Hospital Test for PF has not yet been formally validated in the literature. However, the study was designed following the methodology adopted by Prof. Maffulli for the validation of the original test. Therefore, this is an exploratory study aimed at collecting preliminary data on this new diagnostic test. The secondary objectives of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility and prevalence of the Silfverskiöld test in the study population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is one of the most common causes of foot pain, affecting a substantial proportion of the population במהלך their lifetime. It is characterized by pain and structural alterations at the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia on the calcaneus. The term "plantar fasciopathy" is preferred over "plantar fasciitis," as degenerative tissue changes and thickening are considered to predominate over inflammatory processes.

The pathogenesis of PF remains incompletely understood but is thought to involve the gastrocnemius muscle within an integrated biomechanical unit that includes the triceps surae complex, the calcaneus, and the plantar fascia. PF has a relevant clinical and socioeconomic impact, affecting quality of life and functional capacity, particularly in individuals exposed to prolonged standing or weight-bearing activities. Although most patients respond to conservative treatment, a subset develops persistent or refractory symptoms.

Diagnosis is primarily clinical, based on patient history and physical examination. Imaging modalities such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are mainly used to exclude alternative causes of heel pain. However, the relationship between imaging findings and symptom severity remains inconsistent, and there is currently no simple, standardized clinical test with established diagnostic accuracy for PF. The availability of a reliable bedside test capable of distinguishing PF from other causes of heel pain would improve diagnostic efficiency and clinical decision-making.

Given the anatomical and biomechanical relationship between the Achilles tendon and the plantar fascia, and their shared association with gastrocnemius tightness, adapting a clinical test originally developed for Achilles tendon assessment may provide a useful diagnostic approach. A method based on pain modification during active ankle dorsiflexion, which alters mechanical tension, may be transferable to the plantar fascia with appropriate modification.

This study is designed as an exploratory diagnostic investigation aimed at evaluating the performance of two clinical assessments: localized tenderness at the medial calcaneal tuberosity and a modified version of the Royal London Hospital Test adapted for PF. The study focuses on assessing diagnostic accuracy in terms of sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and predictive values in patients presenting with clinical signs consistent with PF. The modified test has not yet undergone formal validation, and this investigation is intended to provide preliminary evidence regarding its clinical applicability.

In addition, the study explores the role of gastrocnemius tightness within the proposed biomechanical framework by assessing the reproducibility and prevalence of the Silfverskiöld test in the same population.

The study adopts a controlled design with blinded assessment by multiple examiners under standardized conditions. Repeated evaluations within the same day are performed to assess intra- and inter-observer reliability. This methodological approach is intended to ensure robustness in the evaluation of diagnostic performance and to minimize measurement bias.

Overall, the study aims to contribute to the development and validation of simple, clinically applicable diagnostic tools for plantar fasciopathy, with potential implications for improving early diagnosis and optimizing patient management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • BO
      • Bologna, BO, Italy, 40136
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PF group:

    • Patients on the waiting list at Clinic I of the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute for surgical intervention with a diagnosis of recalcitrant PF lasting at least 12 months
    • Age >18 years
    • MRI of the foot and ankle negative for other local causes of pain included in the differential diagnosis of PF
    • Negative electromyography for tarsal tunnel syndrome
  • Control group:

    • Age >18 years
    • Outpatients followed at Clinic I for conditions unrelated to the foot and ankle, with no clinical history of foot pain or pathology in the preceding 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PF and control groups:

    • Minor patients
    • Patients with diagnosed rheumatologic diseases currently under pharmacological treatment
    • Patients with diabetes or diabetic neuropathy
    • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PF group
  • Patients on the waiting list at Clinic I of the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute for surgical intervention with a diagnosis of recalcitrant PF lasting at least 12 months
  • Age >18 years
  • MRI of the foot and ankle negative for other local causes of pain included in the differential diagnosis of PF
  • Negative electromyography for tarsal tunnel syndrome
Modified Version of the Royal London Hospital Test (Gastroc Sign) After identifying tenderness at the medial calcaneal tuberosity with the ankle in a neutral or slightly plantarflexed position, participants are asked to actively perform ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion with the knee extended. If the tenderness identified in the initial phase decreases or disappears during active dorsiflexion, the test is considered positive.
Palpation is performed with the ankle in a neutral position or slight plantarflexion, gently pressing the medial aspect of the plantar heel region starting from the palpable medial calcaneal tuberosity. Participants are asked to report whether tenderness is present or absent.

The Silfverskiöld test [20] is performed with the patient in the supine position. The examiner uses both hands: one stabilizes and locks the subtalar joint in a neutral position, while the other stabilizes the midtarsal joint and forefoot in supination, ensuring that movement is isolated to the tibiotalar joint.

Tibiotalar dorsiflexion is measured under two conditions:

  • With the knee fully extended
  • With the knee flexed at 90 degrees

Limited dorsiflexion in both positions indicates soleus tightness or a bony block as the cause of stiffness. Reduced dorsiflexion with the knee extended, accompanied by a soft and elastic end-feel, suggests isolated gastrocnemius contracture and is therefore interpreted as a positive Silfverskiöld test.

Sham Comparator: Control group
  • Age >18 years
  • Outpatients followed at Clinic I for conditions unrelated to the foot and ankle, with no clinical history of foot pain or pathology in the preceding 12 months
Modified Version of the Royal London Hospital Test (Gastroc Sign) After identifying tenderness at the medial calcaneal tuberosity with the ankle in a neutral or slightly plantarflexed position, participants are asked to actively perform ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion with the knee extended. If the tenderness identified in the initial phase decreases or disappears during active dorsiflexion, the test is considered positive.
Palpation is performed with the ankle in a neutral position or slight plantarflexion, gently pressing the medial aspect of the plantar heel region starting from the palpable medial calcaneal tuberosity. Participants are asked to report whether tenderness is present or absent.

The Silfverskiöld test [20] is performed with the patient in the supine position. The examiner uses both hands: one stabilizes and locks the subtalar joint in a neutral position, while the other stabilizes the midtarsal joint and forefoot in supination, ensuring that movement is isolated to the tibiotalar joint.

Tibiotalar dorsiflexion is measured under two conditions:

  • With the knee fully extended
  • With the knee flexed at 90 degrees

Limited dorsiflexion in both positions indicates soleus tightness or a bony block as the cause of stiffness. Reduced dorsiflexion with the knee extended, accompanied by a soft and elastic end-feel, suggests isolated gastrocnemius contracture and is therefore interpreted as a positive Silfverskiöld test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sensitivity
Time Frame: from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline
To evaluate the ability of tenderness at the medial calcaneal tuberosity and the modified Royal London Hospital Test to correctly identify patients with plantar fasciopathy (true positive rate). Sensitivity reflects the proportion of individuals with PF who are accurately detected by the test.
from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline
Specificity
Time Frame: from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline
To assess the ability of the same clinical tests to correctly identify individuals without plantar fasciopathy (true negative rate). Specificity represents the proportion of non-PF subjects who are correctly classified as negative.
from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline
Reproducibility (Reliability)
Time Frame: from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline
To determine the consistency of the test results when performed by different evaluators (inter-rater reliability) and when repeated by the same evaluator at different time points (intra-rater reliability). This will be quantified using statistical measures such as Cohen's kappa coefficient.
from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline
Predictive Value
Time Frame: from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the tests in practice:

Positive Predictive Value (PPV): the probability that a subject with a positive test result truly has PF.

Negative Predictive Value (NPV): the probability that a subject with a negative test result truly does not have PF.

These measures depend on disease prevalence and will be recalibrated accordingly.

from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reproducibility of the Silfverskiöld Test
Time Frame: from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline
To assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Silfverskiöld test in the study population, determining its consistency as a clinical measure of gastrocnemius tightness.
from the morning to the afternoon of Day 1 - baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simone Ottavio Zielli, MD, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 100/2025/Sper/IOR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Gastroc Sign

Subscribe