Continuous Versus Intermittent Ward Monitoring (CONSTANT)

May 24, 2026 updated by: Daniel Sessler, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Continuous Versus Intermittent Ward Monitoring on Vital Sign Abnormalities, Clinical Interventions, and Serious Complications: the CONSTANT Trial

The investigators will randomize adults having major non-cardiac inpatient surgery to blinded versus unblinded continuous postoperative vital sign monitoring (saturation, ventilation, and heart rate). The investigators will use a wearable, untethered, and battery-powered sensor (Masimo Radius PPG, Masimo, Irvine, CA) that wirelessly connects to a Masimo monitor and continuously records saturation, ventilation, and pulse rate.

The primary outcome will be areas-exceeding-thresholds for desaturation (<85%), bradypnea (<7 breaths/min), tachypnea (>30 breaths/min), tachycardia (heart rate >130 beats/min), and bradycardia (heart rate <45 beats/min). These exposure thresholds represent a balance between events that are clinically meaningful and excessive alarms that will discourage clinician participation. The investigators expect about 1 alert per patient per day with these thresholds, with most being considered informative or actionable by nurses. In unblinded patients, clinician alerts will be activated at these thresholds.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postoperative cardiovascular mortality remains common, and two-thirds occurs during the initial hospitalization. Deterioration typically occurs over hours but is usually unrecognized because vital signs are evaluated a 4-6-hour intervals, just as they were a half-century ago when patient acuity was much lower. Recognition of even subtle changes in basic vital signs may allow clinicians to detect cardiopulmonary deterioration well before serious adverse events occur. Consequent clinical interventions may in turn prevent complications, or at least moderate their severity. The investigators therefore propose a single-center randomized trial of continuous ward monitoring.

The investigators will randomize adults having major non-cardiac inpatient surgery to blinded versus unblinded continuous saturation, ventilation, and heart rate monitoring. Postoperative cardiovascular mortality remains common, and a third occurs during the initial hospitalization. Deterioration occurs over many hours but is usually unrecognized because vital signs are evaluated 4-6-hour intervals, just as they were a half-century ago when patient acuity was much lower. Recognition of even subtle changes in basic vital signs may allow clinicians to detect cardiopulmonary deterioration well before serious adverse events occur. Consequent clinical interventions may in turn prevent complications, or at least moderate their severity. The investigators therefore propose a single-center randomized trial of continuous ward monitoring.

The Investigators will randomize adults having major non-cardiac inpatient surgery to blinded versus unblinded continuous postoperative vital sign monitoring (saturation, ventilation, and heart rate). The investigators will use a wearable, untethered, and battery-powered sensor (Masimo Rad-97 with Radius PPG Tetherless Pulse oximetry system, Masimo, Irvine, CA) that wirelessly connects to a work station and continuously records saturation, ventilation, and pulse rate.

The primary outcome will be areas-exceeding-thresholds for desaturation (<85%), bradypnea (<7 breaths/min), tachypnea (>30 breaths/min), tachycardia (heart rate >130 beats/min), and bradycardia (heart rate <45 beats/min). These exposure thresholds represent a balance between events that are clinically meaningful and excessive alarms that will discourage clinician participation. The investigators expect about 2 alerts per patient per day with these thresholds, with most being considered informative or actionable by nurses. In unblinded patients, clinician alerts will be activated at these thresholds.

Secondarily, the investigators will evaluate a composite of clinical interventions for desaturation, bradypnea, tachypnea, tachycardia, and bradycardia. On an exploratory basis, as a pilot for a future major multi-center outcome trial, The investigators will evaluate a composite of major complications including naloxone administration, rapid-response team activation, unplanned ICU transfer, and mortality within 7 postoperative days.

The innovative long-term goal is to reduce in-hospital postoperative cardiovascular and pulmonary mortality. Specifically, The investigators expect to show that continuous rather than intermittent postoperative vital sign monitoring identifies unstable patients which will allow clinicians to intervene and prevent serious complications and death - thus promoting longer and healthier lives.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

492

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel I Sessler, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Are admitted to one of the wards equipped with the Masimo Radius PPG and Rad-97 monitors;
  2. Are ≥18 years old;
  3. Are designated American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-4;
  4. Had major noncardiac surgery lasting at least 1.5 hours;
  5. Are expected to remain hospitalized at least two postoperative nights;
  6. Had general anesthesia with or without neuraxial anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have language, vision, or hearing impairments that may compromise continuous monitoring;
  2. Are designated Do Not Resuscitate, hospice, or receiving end of life care;
  3. Have previously participated in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Blinded continuous vital sign monitoring
Continuous ward monitoring with vital signs recorded but not available to patients, clinicians, or investigators.
Continuous ward monitoring with vital signs recorded but not available to patients, clinicians, or investigators.
Experimental: Unblinded continuous vital sign monitoring
Continuous ward monitoring with vital signs available to clinicians and investigators.
Continuous ward monitoring with vital signs available to clinicians and investigators.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vital sign abnormalities with routine hospital monitors
Time Frame: 48 postoperative hours
Area of vital sign abnormalities exceeding defined thresholds.
48 postoperative hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interventions
Time Frame: 48 postoperative hours
The incidence of a composite of clinical interventions for desaturation, hypoventilation, tachypnea, tachycardia, bradycardia, and hypotension within 48 hours after major non-cardiac surgery.
48 postoperative hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Sessler, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-24-0978

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared on a collaborative basis with approval of the Steering Committee and data-use agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Blinded continuous vital sign monitoring

Subscribe