- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07573267
Effects of Myofascial Release, Dynamic and Static Stretching in Adolescent Karate Athletes
May 1, 2026 updated by: Mirsad Alkan, Istinye University
A Comparison of the Acute Effects of Myofascial Release, Dynamic Stretching, and Static Stretching Exercises on Posture, Flexibility, Balance, and Performance in Adolescent Karate Athletes
This randomized single-blind crossover trial investigated the acute effects of three different exercise modalities, namely self-myofascial release with a foam roller, dynamic stretching, and static stretching, on posture, flexibility, dynamic balance, and lower-extremity performance in adolescent karate athletes (12-18 years).
Participants attended four weekly sessions at the same time of day and after a 48-hour rest period.
In the first week a baseline (control) measurement was performed, and in the following three weeks each participant received the three interventions in a randomized order.
Outcomes included a four-view smartphone-based posture analysis (PostureScreen Mobile), the Sit-and-Reach Test, the Y Balance Test, the 30-second Sit-to-Stand Test, and the Vertical Jump Test (My Jump Lab 2).
The aim was to identify which warm-up modality offers the greatest acute benefit before karate-specific performance
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Design: This study was a randomized, single-blind, three-period crossover trial conducted at the Usak Karate Ozlem Sport Club, Usak, Turkiye.
Adolescent karate athletes aged 12-18 years training at least 4 days/week and a minimum of 10 hours/week were eligible.
After signing the assent and parental informed consent forms, participants were randomly allocated to one of three treatment-order sequences using sealed opaque envelopes.
Procedures: All assessments and interventions were carried out by the same physiotherapist on the same day of the week, with one-week wash-out periods between sessions, and after a 48-hour abstention from training in order to capture purely acute effects.
Week 1 served as the control measurement (no intervention).
In Weeks 2-4, the three interventions (static stretching, dynamic stretching, self-myofascial release) were applied in a randomized order; outcome measures were repeated immediately after each intervention with a standardized 2-minute rest interval.
Interventions: (1) Static stretching: 30-second hold per muscle group (knee flexors, knee extensors, hip extensors), 5 repetitions, with 15-second inter-set rest.
(2) Dynamic stretching: walking knee-to-chest, walking quadriceps stretch (heel-to-buttock), and walking straight-leg kicks; each performed for 30 seconds (one repetition every 2 seconds), 5 sets with 15-second inter-set rest.
(3) Self-myofascial release (SMR): EVA medium-density foam roller applied to knee extensors, knee flexors, and hip extensors; 5 sets of 30 seconds at 40-60 bpm rolling cadence per muscle group.
Outcome assessment: Posture was evaluated with the PostureScreen Mobile (PSM) application using anterior, posterior, right and left lateral photographs and analyzing head, shoulder, pelvis and knee anterior/lateral translations.
Flexibility was assessed using the Sit-and-Reach Test on a standard reach box.
Dynamic balance was assessed with the Y Balance Test (anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral reach distances normalized to leg length) on both lower extremities.
Lower-extremity muscular endurance was assessed with the 30-second Sit-to-Stand Test.
Vertical jump performance was measured using the My Jump Lab 2 smartphone application with a tripod-fixed iPhone camera.
Statistical analysis: A priori power analysis was performed using G*Power 3.1 (effect size f = 0.25, alpha = 0.05, power = 0.95) which yielded a minimum required sample of 36 participants; 48 athletes were enrolled to account for potential drop-outs.
Normality was tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test.
Because data were not normally distributed, the Friedman test was used for within-subject comparisons, with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests applied for pairwise post-hoc analyses.
A change-score (delta) analysis was used to compare interventions head-to-head.
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 25.0 with significance set at p<0.05.
There was no external funding for the study and the authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
48
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Istinye University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 12-18 years.
- Active karate training of at least 4 days per week and at least 10 hours per week.
- Ability to communicate in Turkish or English (written and verbal).
- Written informed assent of the participant and informed consent of the parent/legal guardian.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any systemic, orthopedic, neurologic, chronic or psychiatric disease.
- Any health problem precluding regular training participation.
- Long-term steroid use.
- Use within the past 48 hours of medications known to influence musculoskeletal performance.
- During the study: pain greater than 3/10 on the VAS, intercurrent illness or injury, or participant request to withdraw.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Static Stretching (SS)
Supervised static stretching of knee flexors, knee extensors and hip extensors.
Each stretch was held for 30 seconds at the end-range, repeated 5 times per muscle group with 15-second rest between repetitions.
|
Single-session static stretching protocol for the lower-extremity (knee flexors, knee extensors, hip extensors): 30-second hold x 5 repetitions x 15-second rest, performed under physiotherapist supervision.
|
|
Experimental: Dynamic Stretching (DS)
Supervised dynamic stretching protocol comprising walking knee-to-chest, walking heel-to-buttock (quadriceps), and walking straight-leg kicks.
Each exercise was performed for 30 seconds (one repetition every 2 seconds), 5 sets with 15-second inter-set rest.
|
Single-session dynamic stretching protocol targeting the hip flexors/extensors and knee flexors/extensors with continuous walking-based movements; 30 seconds x 5 sets per exercise with 15-second rest, performed under physiotherapist supervision.
|
|
Experimental: Self-Myofascial Release (MR)
Supervised foam-roller application to the knee extensors, knee flexors and hip extensors.
Each muscle group was rolled for 30 seconds x 5 sets at a cadence of 40-60 bpm using a medium-density EVA foam roller while transferring body weight onto the roller.
|
Self-myofascial release applied with a medium-density EVA foam roller.
Each lower-extremity muscle group received 5 sets of 30-second rolling at 40-60 bpm, with 4-second forward-and-back rolling cycles, performed under physiotherapist supervision
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sit-and-Reach Test (cm)
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
Lower-extremity flexibility was measured with a standard sit-and-reach box.
Participants reached forward as far as possible with both hands while keeping the knees extended; the most distal point reached was recorded in centimeters.
Higher values indicate greater flexibility.
Safety Issue: No.
|
Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Y Balance Test (composite reach distance, cm)
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
Dynamic balance was assessed with the Y Balance Test.
Participants reached as far as possible with the free leg in the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral directions while balancing on the stance leg.
Reach distances were summed and normalized to leg length; both lower extremities were tested separately.
Higher values indicate better dynamic postural control.
Safety Issue: No.
|
Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
|
30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test (number of repetitions)
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
Lower-extremity muscular endurance was assessed with the 30-second Sit-to-Stand Test using a standard chair without armrests.
Participants performed as many full sit-to-stand repetitions as possible in 30 seconds with arms crossed over the chest.
Higher values indicate greater lower-extremity endurance.
Safety Issue: No.
|
Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
|
Vertical Jump Height (cm) - My Jump Lab 2
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
Counter-movement vertical jump height was measured with the validated My Jump Lab 2 smartphone application using a tripod-mounted iPhone (slow-motion video).
Participants performed three maximal jumps with hands on the hips; maximum, minimum and mean jump heights were recorded.
Higher values indicate greater lower-extremity power.
Safety Issue: No.
|
Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
|
Posture Analysis (PostureScreen Mobile - PSM)
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
Static posture was assessed using the PostureScreen Mobile (PSM) application with four-view photographs (anterior, posterior, right lateral, left lateral) taken with a tripod-mounted smartphone.
Anterior translation of the head, shoulders and pelvis (sagittal plane) and lateral translations of the head, shoulders, pelvis and knees (frontal plane) were quantified by the application's computer-vision algorithm.
Lower deviation values indicate better postural alignment.
Safety Issue: No.
|
Immediately before and immediately after each intervention session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 15, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
July 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 1, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
May 7, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 7, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 1, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Karate- 2025-104
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sports Physical Therapy
-
University of SevilleCompletedGait | Physical Therapy | Sports Physical Therapy | Exercise TherapySpain
-
Karabuk UniversityRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingSports Physical TherapyPakistan
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaNot yet recruitingSports Physical TherapySpain
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedSports Physical TherapyPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedSports Physical TherapyPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedSports Physical TherapyPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityActive, not recruitingSports Physical TherapyPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedSports Physical TherapyPakistan
-
Biruni UniversityCompletedSports Physical TherapyTurkey
Clinical Trials on Static Stretching
-
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteCompletedNeuromuscular Manifestations
-
Yuksek Ihtisas UniversityCompletedMuscle Stretching ExercisesTurkey
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityCompleted
-
Universidade Estadual do Norte do ParanaCompletedMuscle Strength | Muscle Strength DynamometerBrazil
-
Universidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaUniversity of JaénCompleted
-
Goethe UniversityCompletedRandomized Controlled Trial | Fascia | Myofascial | StretchingGermany
-
University College of Northern DenmarkUniversity of Copenhagen; Bispebjerg Hospital; Research Unit for General Practice...CompletedRange of Motion | Pain Threshold | Stretching | Pain SensitivityDenmark
-
Medical University of SilesiaUnknownMenstrual Cycle | Passive Stretching | Hamstring MusclesPoland
-
King Saud UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedEffects of Percussive Massage Treatment With Theragun on Post Exercise Delayed Onset Muscle SorenessDelayed Onset Muscle SorenessPakistan