The Effect of Nasogastric Tube Placement on Complications in Patients With Small Bowel Obstruction - the SBO-TUBE Trial (SBO-TUBE)

May 27, 2026 updated by: Daniel Wilhelms, University Hospital, Linkoeping

The Effect of Nasogastric Tube Placement on Complications in Patients With Small Bowel Obstruction - the SBO-TUBE Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a surgical emergency where the normal continuous bowel movements are hindered and approximately 8000-9000 patients visit the emergency department every year in Sweden due to SBO. A minority of these have evidence of intestinal injury, warranting emergency surgery, while the majority (70-90%) will have an initial plan for non-operative management with a nasogastric tube (NGT), placed to alleviate gastric pressure, reduce pain and prevent complications like aspiration pneumonia. The effectiveness of NGT in patients with SBO to prevent complications is unclear, with current data from observational data indicating increased risk of pneumonia in patients treated with NGT. Objective: To assess whether deferring the placement of a NGT in subjects with small bowel obstruction and planned for non-operative management leads to lower rates of respiratory complication compared to placing an NGT. Methods: This will be a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study of patients with SBO and an initial plan for non-operative management. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to not receive an NGT (intervention) or receive an NGT (control) and monitored regularly until the SBO resolves spontaneously or through surgery, whichever comes first. The primary outcome will be a composite of pulmonary complications and treatment in a high dependency unit, analyzed as a superiority study with an intention-to-treat framework with secondary per-protocol and non-inferiority analysis. The trial will recruit 1000 patients. Secondary analysis includes health-economy, qualitative interviews, and long term (1 year) follow up. Discussion: The current management of NGT in SBO is based on clinical and guideline-based recommendations with limited supporting data. Available data, albeit observational with risk for selection bias, indicates increased risk of complications. This equipoise warrants further investigation to understand the true benefit of NGT in SBO. This study will provide high quality evidence of the ability of a NGT to prevent complications in SBO through its randomized, prospective design

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Erika Johannesson, MSc
  • Phone Number: +46101030000

Study Locations

      • Linköping, Sweden, 58561
        • Linkoping University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Motala, Sweden, 59135
        • Motala Lasarett
        • Contact:
      • Värnamo, Sweden, 33156
        • Värnamo Lasarett
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Amanda Tyrsing, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kaj Li, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Small bowel obstruction diagnosed on Computer Tomography

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nasogastric Tube already places
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Cerebral palsy
  • Dementia
  • Parkinson's disease
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Previous stroke with documented persistent dysphagia
  • Planned for urgent surgery
  • Acute Massive Gastric Dilatation
  • Gastric outlet obstruction
  • Fundoplicatio/Inability to vomit
  • Signs of pneumonia/pneumonitis on initial diagnostic CT

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nasogastric Tube
This arm receives a nasogastric tube. Other management according to local guidelines.
The placement of a nasogastric tube from the nares to gastric ventricle.
No Intervention: No Nasogastric Tube
Nasogastric tube is deferred. Other management according to local guidelines

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite of Pulmonary complications and care at a high dependency unit or intensive care unit
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge

Pulmonary complications, any of:

  • Respiratory infection - treatment with antibiotics supported by suggestive findings on x-ray and/or laboratory findings
  • Respiratory failure - new pulse-oximetry values below 90% or an increased need for supplemental oxygen for an oxygen saturation above 90%, measured by pulse-oximetry or blood gases.
  • Pleural effusion - based on x-ray findings
  • Atelectasis - based on x-ray findings
  • Pneumothorax - based on x-ray findings
  • Bronchospasm - documented wheezing or increased effort breathing
  • Aspiration pneumonitis - treatment with antibiotics supported by suggestive findings on x-ray and/or laboratory findings and a clinical correlation to an event of vomiting/dysphagia High dependency unit or Intensive care unit

This study will use the definitions of pulmonary complications defined by Jammer et al:

Individual components of the composite endpoint will be reported and analysed separately as secondary endpoints.

From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgery
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Requiring surgery for their small bowel obstruction
From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Death
Time Frame: From enrollment until 365 days
Death from any cause
From enrollment until 365 days
Time to functional recovery
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first

Time to functional recovery is seen as a more objective outcome compared to hospital length of stay, which may be influenced by other factors, not related to the disease. Functional recovery is a composite of the following components:

  • Independently mobile at preoperative level
  • Sufficient pain control with oral medications only
  • Ability to maintain necessary caloric intake with parenteral nutrition of fluids
  • No intravenous fluid administration
  • No clinical signs of infection
From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Bowel perforation
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
As a finding, or complication, during surgery
From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Bowel resection
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Bowel resection during surgery measured in cm.
From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: Enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Length of stay in hospitals measured both as when the subject is ready to leave the hospital and when the subject actually leaves hospital
Enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Emergency Department Length of Stay
Time Frame: From emergency department registration until 2 days or emergency department discharge, whichever comes first.
The duration the research subject stays in the Emergency Department
From emergency department registration until 2 days or emergency department discharge, whichever comes first.
Time to resolved small bowel obstruction
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Time to resolvement of obstruction, defined as either; Water soluable contrast passing to the colon, or both ability to pass gas and ability for oral intake
From enrollment until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Readmission for small bowel obstruction
Time Frame: From enrollment until 365 days
Any readmission to hospital for small bowel obstruction
From enrollment until 365 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrent Small Bowel Obstruction
Time Frame: From inclusion until 365 days
Admission for small bowel obstruction
From inclusion until 365 days
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after hospital discharge
Measured by the EQ-5D-5L tool
Up to 30 days after hospital discharge
Number of required morphine-equivalents
Time Frame: From inclusion until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
From inclusion until 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Nausea
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital admission, whichever comes first
Nausea, measured on a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10
From enrollment until 30 days or hospital admission, whichever comes first
Pain from Small bowel obstruction
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital admission, whichever comes first
Pain, measure on a numeric rating scale from 0-10
From enrollment until 30 days or hospital admission, whichever comes first
Pain from insertion of nasogastric tube
Time Frame: From enrollment until 2 days or emergency department discharge, whichever comes first
Patient experience pain on a NRS 0-10 scale
From enrollment until 2 days or emergency department discharge, whichever comes first
Discomfort from nasogastric tube
Time Frame: From enrollment until 30 days or hospital admission, whichever comes first
Patient-experience discomfort, rated on NRS (0-10) scale
From enrollment until 30 days or hospital admission, whichever comes first

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jens Wretborn, Associate Professor, Clinical Department of Emergency Medicine in Linköping, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 4, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Small Bowel Obstruction

Clinical Trials on Nasogastric tube placement

Subscribe