Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance and Impact on Clinical Outcomes of the NuRapid-CRISPR Pathogen Profile Assay in ICU Patients With Sepsis

May 6, 2026 updated by: Sheng Wang MD PhD, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital

A Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance and Impact on Clinical Outcomes of the NuRapid-CRISPR Pathogen Profile Assay in ICU Patients With Sepsis

This study is a prospective, multicenter, integrated trial designed to evaluate, from the perspectives of diagnostic performance and clinical utility, whether a diagnostic and treatment strategy based on the NuRapid-CRISPR rapid pathogen detection technology can reduce the 28-day all-cause mortality rate in patients with sepsis or septic shock in the ICU, compared to traditional pathogen culture.

The study consists of two parts:

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy Study: For all enrolled sepsis patients, microbiological specimens will undergo concurrent blinded testing, with NuRapid-CRISPR serving as the test of interest and traditional pathogen culture as the reference standard. A prospective comparison will evaluate differences between the two methods in key metrics such as pathogen detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and turnaround time.
  2. Clinical Utility Cohort Study: All patients will undergo NuRapid-CRISPR testing as part of routine clinical care. Based on whether the rapid results are adopted clinically to guide early antimicrobial therapy decisions, the cohort will naturally form an exposure group (early treatment adjustments based on NuRapid-CRISPR results) and a control group (treatment primarily based on traditional culture results or empirical therapy). The study will prospectively compare the two groups in terms of the time to optimize antimicrobial therapy, coverage of the initial treatment spectrum, and infection-related clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

396

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Du Yingying, Doctor
  • Phone Number: +862166111524
  • Email: dyy9522@163.com

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
      • Shanghai, China
        • Center for Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Shanghai
        • Contact:
      • Shanghai, China
        • Yangpu District Central Hospital, Shanghai
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years, length of stay in the ICU ≤ 24 hours;
  • Meets the Sepsis-3.0 diagnostic criteria (an increase in SOFA score of ≥2 points from baseline, and evidence of infection);
  • Clinically suspected sepsis or septic shock; the pathogen is unknown; the clinical plan is to collect sterile or suitable specimens, such as blood, respiratory specimens, cerebrospinal fluid, and ascites, for microbiological testing;
  • Expected ICU stay of ≥48 hours and ability to complete at least 28 days of clinical follow-up;
  • A written informed consent form signed by the patient or their legally authorized representative;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • At the time of admission, the patient had already received a definitive pathogen diagnosis (based on microbiological culture, reliable molecular testing, or serological evidence), and targeted antimicrobial therapy against that pathogen had been initiated for more than 48 hours;
  • Vital signs are extremely unstable; death is expected within 24 hours;
  • Patients with severe primary immunodeficiency (e.g., AIDS, active hematologic malignancies, post-transplantation of solid organs or hematopoietic stem cells, or long-term use of high-dose glucocorticoids [prednisone ≥ 20 mg/day or equivalent dose for more than 4 weeks] or other potent immunosuppressants);
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • The patient or their authorized representative has expressly refused to undergo any pathogen testing;
  • It is not possible to obtain a suitable specimen for testing due to anatomical, physiological, or technical reasons;
  • The patient is currently participating in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with the assessment of the primary outcome of this study;
  • The patient or their authorized representative has declined to participate in this study;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NuRapid-CRISPR
Eligible specimens from enrolled patients undergo NuRapid-CRISPR testing concurrently with submission for conventional culture. Test results (including pathogen species and resistance gene information) are delivered to the attending physician via the hospital information system and/or telephone notification within 2-4 hours of validation. The test report is accompanied by an abstract of the *Expert Consensus on Clinical Interpretation of Rapid Molecular Test Results and Treatment Recommendations*, developed by experts in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology. Clinicians are encouraged and authorized to adjust antimicrobial treatment regimens as appropriate based on these rapid results and the patient's specific clinical condition, even before receiving conventional antimicrobial susceptibility test results. The timing of decisions to adjust antimicrobial therapy based on rapid results, the specific regimens, and the rationale for such adjustments must be documented in detail.
Adjusting early-stage treatment based on NuRapid-CRISPR results.
Active Comparator: Pathogen culture
Patient specimens were submitted for conventional pathogen culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in accordance with standard clinical procedures. The NuRapid-CRISPR assay was performed concurrently; however, its results were blinded to clinicians until the conventional culture report was issued and were not used as a basis for clinical decision-making. The initial selection and adjustment of antimicrobial agents were based entirely on clinical experience, routine inflammatory markers such as procalcitonin, and subsequent conventional culture and susceptibility test results. All treatment decisions and their rationale were routinely documented.
Primarily based on traditional cultivation methods or empirical treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day all-cause mortality rate
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)
Death from any cause occurring between the date of randomization and day 28 (±2 days).In-hospital deaths: Recorded in real time through daily medical record reviews. Out-of-hospital deaths: Confirmed via a structured telephone follow-up conducted on Day 28 of enrollment. The telephone follow-up will use a standardized questionnaire and will be conducted by trained study coordinators.
From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first targeted therapy
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)
The time interval (in hours) from the time of enrollment to the first use of an antimicrobial agent effective against the final confirmed pathogen (based on conventional culture or clinical diagnosis).Calculated precisely by comparing the time of antibiotic prescription execution with the time of the final microbiology report.
From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)
Rate of adequate initial treatment
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)
The proportion of empirical antimicrobial regimens initiated within 24 hours of enrollment whose antimicrobial spectrum covers the ultimately identified pathogen.Conducted by infectious disease specialists based on the final microbiological diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.
From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)
Length of stay in the ICU
Time Frame: From the subject's admission to the ICU until their discharge from the ICU
Length of stay in the ICU.Extracted directly from discharge records in the hospital information system, accurate to the day.
From the subject's admission to the ICU until their discharge from the ICU
Total length of stay
Time Frame: From the subject's admission to the hospital until their final discharge
Total length of stay.Extracted directly from discharge records in the hospital information system, accurate to the day.
From the subject's admission to the hospital until their final discharge
Number of days without ventilator or vasoactive drug support
Time Frame: During the 28-day observation period, every day
Calculated based on cumulative daily organ support records over the 28-day observation period.
During the 28-day observation period, every day
SOFA Rating
Time Frame: During the 28-day observation period, every day
Calculate the SOFA score daily and record any new or worsening cases of organ failure.The higher the SOFA score, the higher the incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS); conversely, the lower the score, the lower the incidence.
During the 28-day observation period, every day
Total medical expenses
Time Frame: On the day of discharge from the hospital
Retrieve the total medical costs for patients from enrollment through discharge from the hospital's financial system.
On the day of discharge from the hospital

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on NuRapid-CRISPR Rapid Pathogen Detection Technology

Subscribe