Mind Your Heart Intervention for American Indian Women (MYH)

MIND Your Heart Study for American Indian Women

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a culturally-adapted intervention can improve cardiovascular health in American Indian women.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can this intervention realistically work for American Indian women?
  • Do American Indian women find the intervention acceptable?
  • Does the intervention help improve cardiovascular health in American Indian women? Researchers will compare the intervention group to a control group (a group that does not receive the intervention) to see whether the cardiovascular health of the intervention group improves.

Participants will:

  • Attend 3 data collections over 3 months.
  • Be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or a control group.
  • (Intervention group participants) attend 8 weekly classes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Conduct a 3-month randomized controlled pilot study to examine feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of an 8-week, culturally-adapted intervention in American Indian women at risk for cardiovascular disease on the following outcomes:

Primary cardiovascular health outcomes:

  • blood pressure
  • heart rate variability
  • inflammatory markers
  • metabolic function

Secondary outcomes:

  • stress
  • positive psychological well-being
  • health behaviors (diet, exercise)
  • self-regulation
  • self-efficacy

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Pembroke, North Carolina, United States, 28372
        • Recruiting
        • UNC Health Primary and Specialty Care at Pembroke
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women 18-55 years old who self-identify as Lumbee Indian and
  • Have one or more risk factors for cardiovascular disease:

    • overweight/obese, defined as BMI >25 kg/m^2
    • hypertensive as measured by study staff
    • physical inactivity
  • Willing and able to follow study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women currently enrolled in an organized weight-loss or mindfulness program
  • Pregnant women or women planning to become pregnant during the study period
  • Conditions that exclude study enrollment include:

    • heart murmur
    • congenital heart disease
    • family history of sudden death
    • or orthopedic limitations or health conditions precluding exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
Intervention Group: 8-week culturally-adapted intervention
A culturally-adapted cardiovascular health promotion intervention delivered for 8-weeks with American Indian women at risk for cardiovascular disease
No Intervention: Control Group
Control Group: receives no intervention during the study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Blood pressure will be measured three times during each appointment. The first blood pressure will be discarded, and the second and third measures will be averaged. Participants will rest 1 to 2 minutes between each reading.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in Heart rate variability (HRV)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
HRV will be measured using a dual wireless electrocardiogram portable device for 10 minutes while the participant is resting in a seated position.
Baseline and Month 3
Change in Hs-CRP
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
Collection of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) to measure inflammation.
Baseline and Month 3
Change in Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
Collection of IL-6 to measure inflammation.
Baseline and Month 3
Change in Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
Collection of hemoglobin A1c to measure metabolic function.
Baseline and Month 3
Change in Lipid panel
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
Collection of a fasting lipid panel to measure total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein to measure metabolic function.
Baseline and Month 3
Change in body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Collection of weight and height to calculate BMI. Weight and height will be collected two times during each visit and averaged. The average weight and height will be calculated to determine BMI. BMI is calculated as weight (kg) / height (m^2).
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in body fat percentage
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Collection of body fat measurements using a handheld bioelectrical impedance device.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in contextualized stress: burden
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
The investigators will measure burden (as a subscale of contextualized stress) using the Jackson, Hogue, Phillips (JHP) Contextualized Stress Measure (Gendered and Financial Stress) Burden Subscale. 17-item subscale of the JHP Contextualized Stress measure assessing chronic exposure to gendered and racialized stress. The burden subscale uses a 6-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Agree to 5=Strongly Disagree; 6=Not Applicable). Scores range from 17-102 with higher scores reflect a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in perceived stress
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Perceived stress will be measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), a 10-item scale assessing stress experiences over the preceding month. The PSS measures the frequency of feelings and thoughts using a 5-point Likert scale, where positive responses are scored in reverse. The PSS score is determined by totaling all responses and ranges from 0 to 40 with lower scores reflecting a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in positive psychological well-being
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Mental Health Continuum - Short Form (MHC-SF) measures positive emotions and comprises 14 items, representing emotional well-being, psychosocial well-being, and social well-being. On a 6-point Likert scale (0 = never; 5 = everyday), respondents indicate how often they felt various positive feelings in the past month and the extent of their agreement or disagreement with various statements indicative of psychosocial and social well-being. Possible scores for the MHC-SF range from 0 - 70. Higher scores reflect a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in positive emotions
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) will be used to capture a broader array of emotions. Respondents rate the frequency of their experiences of 20 different emotions over the past two weeks, using a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = most of the time). Items are summed for both positive and negative emotions (both ranging from 0 - 40). Higher scores on the positive subscale indicate more positive emotions.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in negative emotions
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) will be used to capture a broader array of emotions. Respondents rate the frequency of their experiences of 20 different emotions over the past two weeks, using a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = most of the time). Items are summed for both positive and negative emotions (both ranging from 0 - 40). Higher scores on the negative subscale indicate more negative emotions.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in carotenoid concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
As a proxy for fruit and vegetable (F/V) intake, carotenoid concentrations in the skin will be measured using a portable, non-invasive, pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy device called the Veggie Meter. The Veggie Meter produces a score from 0 to 800, with higher scores indicating greater skin carotenoid levels, which suggest a greater intake of fruits and vegetables.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Physical activity will be measured by total time being active. Investigators will collect activity data over a 7-day span using an accelerometer worn on the wrist.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in mindfulness self-regulation
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Mindfulness self-regulation will be measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), a 39-item, self-administered measure that assesses various aspects of mindfulness. Responses range from 1 (never/very rarely true) to 5 (almost always/always true) and are summed for a final score. Higher scores indicate greater mindfulness. Total scores range from 39 - 195.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in eating self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Eating self-efficacy will be measured using the Eating Self-Efficacy Scale, a 25-item tool asking respondents to rate their difficulty in controlling eating from 1 (no difficulty) to 7 (most difficultly). Scores range from 25 - 175 with higher total scores indicating lower self-efficacy.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in exercise self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Exercise self-efficacy will be measured using the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEE), which records the strength of efficacy beliefs by 9 questions on a 11-point scale from 0 (cannot do at all) to 10 (certain can do). Scores range from 0 - 90 with higher scores indicating greater exercise self-efficacy.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in contextualized stress: stress states
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
The investigators will measure stress states (as a subscale of contextualized stress) using the Jackson, Hogue, Phillips (JHP) Contextualized Stress Measure (Gendered and Financial Stress) Stress States Subscale. 4-item subscale of the JHP Contextualized Stress assessing chronic exposure to gendered and racialized stress. The stress states subscale uses a 6-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Agree to 5=Strongly Disagree; 6=Not Applicable). Higher scores indicate greater stress.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
Change in Super Woman Schema (SWS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3
35-item measures 5 dimensions of internalized strength, emotion suppression, vulnerability resistance, motivation, and caretaking. Items are summed using a Likert scale (0=not true to 4=true all the time). Low SWS = 0-36; Moderate SWS = 36-70; High SWS = 71-105. Higher scores indicate closer alignment to the schema.
Baseline, Week 8, and Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jada Brooks, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21-1762
  • 5R34HL158947-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 5R34HL158947-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 1R34HL158947-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 and continuing for 24 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

beginning 9 and continuing for 24 months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Health

Clinical Trials on Culturally-adapted intervention to improve cardiovascular health in American Indian women

Subscribe