- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07592143
"Comparison of Buffered Versus Non-Buffered Local Anesthetic in Patients With Inflamed Tissues for Pain Perception, Onset, Duration and Adverse Effects"
This study aims to determine whether buffered or non-buffered local anesthetic (LA) is more effective and safer for managing pain in patients with inflamed tissues undergoing surgical procedures. Local anesthetics are widely used to reduce pain, but their effectiveness may vary, particularly in inflamed tissues where achieving adequate anesthesia can be challenging.
In this study, patients will be divided into two groups: one group will receive buffered local anesthetic, and the other will receive non-buffered local anesthetic. The study will compare the level of pain experienced during injection and the procedure, how quickly the anesthetic takes effect, and how long the numbness lasts. In addition, any side effects such as dizziness, nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions, or heart-related complications will be carefully monitored.
The study will also examine whether the presence of co-morbid conditions (such as diabetes, hypertension, or other chronic illnesses) affects the outcomes of both types of anesthetics.
The main question this study seeks to answer is whether buffered local anesthetic provides better pain relief, faster onset, longer duration, and fewer side effects compared to non-buffered local anesthetic, and how these outcomes differ in patients with and without co-morbid conditions. The findings may help improve pain management practices and guide healthcare providers in selecting the most appropriate anesthetic for different patient groups.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Hafiz M Usman
- Phone Number: +923327208618
- Email: usmanyaqoob319@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient age between 18 and 60 and all gender.
- Patients requiring surgical wound debridement under local anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women (documented on medical record).
- Patients taking the medications such as narcotics, antidepressants and sedatives from last 3 months that can influence the anesthetic assessment.
- Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics or sulfites documented on previous medical record.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A
Group A will get Buffered Local Anesthesia
|
The investigator will add Sodium bicarbonate in lidocaine with adrenaline (1:80,000 ) for Buffered Local anesthesia.
|
|
No Intervention: Group B
Group B will get Non-Buffered local anesthesia
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Perception
Time Frame: Pain during infiltration will be evaluated at 0 minutes and again at 5 minutes post-infiltration at the onset of surgical procedure and scores will be also taken at 10-minute intervals during the procedure.
|
The level of pain relief achieved by buffered and non-buffered LA will be measured by using Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10.
The highest score thats is 10 represent the Worst pain, the worst outcome and the minimum score that is 0 represents no pain, desirable outcome.
|
Pain during infiltration will be evaluated at 0 minutes and again at 5 minutes post-infiltration at the onset of surgical procedure and scores will be also taken at 10-minute intervals during the procedure.
|
|
Onset Time
Time Frame: Every 30 seconds up to 1/2 hour
|
The duration between the administration of the anesthetic injection and sensation checked by sharp object at the anesthetized site
|
Every 30 seconds up to 1/2 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
|
Patient satisfaction with pain management post procedure will also be measured on the Scale of 1-5(poor- excellent)
|
Up to 24 hours after the procedure
|
|
Duration of Action
Time Frame: Every 30 minutes for up to 4 hours
|
The duration of anesthesia will be measured through sensory testing and patient evaluation after every 30 minutes for up to 4 hours until the sensation returns.
|
Every 30 minutes for up to 4 hours
|
|
Adverse Effects
Time Frame: every 30 minutes for up to 2 hours
|
Adverse effects will also be evaluated carefully during the operative procedure and again at 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after the operation.
|
every 30 minutes for up to 2 hours
|
|
Co-morbid conditions:
Time Frame: Every 30seconds for up to 24 hour
|
The participants in the control group and study group will be stratified based on the predefined co-morbid conditions documented in their medical records such as DM, HTN, IHD, asthma and renal failure.
This stratification will allow the subgroup analyses of the outcome variables of the buffered and non buffered local anesthetic across different clinical profile.
|
Every 30seconds for up to 24 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hafiz M Usman, King Edward Medical University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 631/RC/KEMU
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Comparison of Buffered Versus Non Buffered Local Anesthetic In Inflamed Tissues
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillDental Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.CompletedAnesthetics, Local | Blood Levels of Buffered vs Non-buffered LidocaineUnited States
-
Tishreen UniversityCompletedInflamed and Infected Primary Molars in Children | Effectiveness of Buffered Local Anesthesia During Dental ExtractionSyrian Arab Republic
Clinical Trials on Buffered Local Anesthesia
-
Alexandria UniversityActive, not recruitingLocal AnesthesiaEgypt
-
University of ZagrebActive, not recruiting
-
Charitable Organisation Charitable Fund Superhumans...Not yet recruitingPain | Pain Management | Phantom Limb Pain | Phantom Limb Pain After AmputationUkraine
-
Bursa City HospitalUlusoy, Emre, M.D.CompletedOpen-heart Surgery | Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Bursa City HospitalEmre ULUSOYNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Acute Pain
-
Ataturk UniversityCompletedMalnutrition Severe | Trauma (Including Fractures) | Dialysis CatheterTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingOCTA Changes With Local Anesthesia
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityActive, not recruitingDorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation | Transforaminal Epidural Injection | Servical Disc HerniationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Cleveland Dental InstituteRecruiting
-
KoelisNot yet recruiting