"Comparison of Buffered Versus Non-Buffered Local Anesthetic in Patients With Inflamed Tissues for Pain Perception, Onset, Duration and Adverse Effects"

May 13, 2026 updated by: King Edward Medical University

This study aims to determine whether buffered or non-buffered local anesthetic (LA) is more effective and safer for managing pain in patients with inflamed tissues undergoing surgical procedures. Local anesthetics are widely used to reduce pain, but their effectiveness may vary, particularly in inflamed tissues where achieving adequate anesthesia can be challenging.

In this study, patients will be divided into two groups: one group will receive buffered local anesthetic, and the other will receive non-buffered local anesthetic. The study will compare the level of pain experienced during injection and the procedure, how quickly the anesthetic takes effect, and how long the numbness lasts. In addition, any side effects such as dizziness, nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions, or heart-related complications will be carefully monitored.

The study will also examine whether the presence of co-morbid conditions (such as diabetes, hypertension, or other chronic illnesses) affects the outcomes of both types of anesthetics.

The main question this study seeks to answer is whether buffered local anesthetic provides better pain relief, faster onset, longer duration, and fewer side effects compared to non-buffered local anesthetic, and how these outcomes differ in patients with and without co-morbid conditions. The findings may help improve pain management practices and guide healthcare providers in selecting the most appropriate anesthetic for different patient groups.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

68

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient age between 18 and 60 and all gender.
  • Patients requiring surgical wound debridement under local anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women (documented on medical record).
  • Patients taking the medications such as narcotics, antidepressants and sedatives from last 3 months that can influence the anesthetic assessment.
  • Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics or sulfites documented on previous medical record.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Group A will get Buffered Local Anesthesia
The investigator will add Sodium bicarbonate in lidocaine with adrenaline (1:80,000 ) for Buffered Local anesthesia.
No Intervention: Group B
Group B will get Non-Buffered local anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Perception
Time Frame: Pain during infiltration will be evaluated at 0 minutes and again at 5 minutes post-infiltration at the onset of surgical procedure and scores will be also taken at 10-minute intervals during the procedure.
The level of pain relief achieved by buffered and non-buffered LA will be measured by using Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10. The highest score thats is 10 represent the Worst pain, the worst outcome and the minimum score that is 0 represents no pain, desirable outcome.
Pain during infiltration will be evaluated at 0 minutes and again at 5 minutes post-infiltration at the onset of surgical procedure and scores will be also taken at 10-minute intervals during the procedure.
Onset Time
Time Frame: Every 30 seconds up to 1/2 hour
The duration between the administration of the anesthetic injection and sensation checked by sharp object at the anesthetized site
Every 30 seconds up to 1/2 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Patient satisfaction with pain management post procedure will also be measured on the Scale of 1-5(poor- excellent)
Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Duration of Action
Time Frame: Every 30 minutes for up to 4 hours
The duration of anesthesia will be measured through sensory testing and patient evaluation after every 30 minutes for up to 4 hours until the sensation returns.
Every 30 minutes for up to 4 hours
Adverse Effects
Time Frame: every 30 minutes for up to 2 hours
Adverse effects will also be evaluated carefully during the operative procedure and again at 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after the operation.
every 30 minutes for up to 2 hours
Co-morbid conditions:
Time Frame: Every 30seconds for up to 24 hour
The participants in the control group and study group will be stratified based on the predefined co-morbid conditions documented in their medical records such as DM, HTN, IHD, asthma and renal failure. This stratification will allow the subgroup analyses of the outcome variables of the buffered and non buffered local anesthetic across different clinical profile.
Every 30seconds for up to 24 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hafiz M Usman, King Edward Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 631/RC/KEMU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Comparison of Buffered Versus Non Buffered Local Anesthetic In Inflamed Tissues

Clinical Trials on Buffered Local Anesthesia

Subscribe