Diode Laser-Assisted Direct Pulp Capping Trial

Effect of Diode Laser Therapy Following Direct Pulp Capping on Postoperative Pain and Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates whether adjunctive 808-nm diode laser therapy after direct pulp capping reduces postoperative pain and dentin hypersensitivity compared with conventional Biodentine treatment. Sixty teeth from fifty-six participants with carious pulp exposure were randomly allocated into two treatment groups. Postoperative pain, dentin hypersensitivity, and 6-month clinical success rates were assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Direct pulp capping (DPC) is a vital pulp therapy procedure intended to preserve pulp vitality and stimulate reparative dentin formation after pulp exposure. The clinical success of DPC depends on effective sealing of the exposure site, bacterial control, and maintenance of pulpal health. Bioactive tricalcium silicate-based materials such as Biodentine have demonstrated favorable biological and mechanical properties and are widely used as pulp-capping agents because of their biocompatibility, sealing ability, and dentin-bridge induction potential.

Despite the favorable outcomes of modern pulp-capping materials, postoperative pain and dentin hypersensitivity remain common complications following DPC. These symptoms may negatively affect patient comfort, treatment acceptance, and short-term clinical outcomes. Adjunctive use of diode laser therapy has been proposed to improve the biological environment of the exposed pulp by providing hemostasis, antimicrobial action, and photobiomodulation. Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that diode laser irradiation may reduce inflammation, stabilize cell membranes, improve microcirculation, and enhance cellular metabolism through increased adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, thereby reducing postoperative discomfort and promoting tissue healing.

However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of diode laser therapy as an adjunct to DPC remains limited, particularly due to variations in laser parameters, treatment protocols, and pulp-capping materials among previous studies. Therefore, this randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of adjunctive 808-nm diode laser therapy following direct pulp capping using Biodentine.

A total of 60 teeth from 56 participants diagnosed with carious pulp exposure and fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included. Eligible teeth were randomly allocated into two groups using a computer-generated 1:1 randomization sequence with allocation concealment by sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE). In the control group, direct pulp capping was performed using Biodentine following conventional hemostasis and disinfection procedures. In the experimental group, adjunctive diode laser therapy (808 nm) was applied for hemostasis and disinfection prior to Biodentine placement, using standardized irradiation parameters.

The primary outcomes of the study are postoperative pain intensity and dentin hypersensitivity. Postoperative pain is assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) and the duration until complete pain resolution is recorded. Dentin hypersensitivity is evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months using a cold stimulus and NRS scoring. The secondary outcome is the clinical success rate at 6 months, determined by clinical and radiographic criteria including pulp vitality, absence of spontaneous pain, absence of tenderness to percussion, and absence of radiographic periapical pathology.

The study hypothesizes that adjunctive diode laser therapy will significantly reduce postoperative pain and dentin hypersensitivity following direct pulp capping compared with conventional Biodentine treatment, while maintaining comparable clinical success rates at 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Huế, Vietnam, 49000
        • Department of Odonto-Stomatology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged 10 to 58 years.
  • Teeth with pulp exposure caused by caries removal.
  • Vital teeth confirmed by clinical pulp vitality tests (cold and heat tests) and radiographic examination.
  • No history of spontaneous pain; only mild or tolerable discomfort to cold stimuli.
  • Pulp exposure less than 2 mm in diameter.
  • Normal radiographic findings with no periapical pathology.
  • Bleeding controllable within 10 minutes.
  • Written informed consent obtained from participants or legal guardians.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pulp exposure caused by trauma or occlusal wear.
  • Teeth unsuitable for restoration, including subgingival fractures or vertical root cracks.
  • Clinical signs of irreversible pulpitis, abscess, or sinus tract.
  • Uncontrollable bleeding after 10 minutes of saline pressure or laser hemostasis.
  • Previous use of analgesics before treatment.
  • Multiple pulp exposures in the same dental arch.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Biodentine Direct Pulp Capping
Eligible teeth received conventional direct pulp capping treatment. After local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, caries removal and cavity preparation were performed. Hemostasis was achieved using saline-moistened cotton pellets followed by 3% sodium hypochlorite disinfection. Biodentine was placed over the pulp exposure site and the tooth was restored using a selective-etch composite restoration protocol.
Biodentine was used as a bioactive tricalcium silicate pulp-capping material placed directly over the exposed pulp tissue following hemostasis and cavity disinfection.
Experimental: Diode Laser-Assisted Biodentine Direct Pulp Capping
Eligible teeth received adjunctive 808-nm diode laser therapy during direct pulp capping. After standard cavity preparation, diode laser irradiation was applied for hemostasis and disinfection before placement of Biodentine and definitive composite restoration. The laser protocol included standardized irradiation parameters for pulp hemostasis and cavity disinfection.
Biodentine was used as a bioactive tricalcium silicate pulp-capping material placed directly over the exposed pulp tissue following hemostasis and cavity disinfection.
Adjunctive diode laser irradiation was applied for hemostasis and disinfection before Biodentine placement during direct pulp capping.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dentin Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment
Dentin hypersensitivity will be assessed using a cold stimulus test (0-4°C water) and recorded using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10), where higher scores indicate greater sensitivity.
1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment
Postoperative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Daily until complete pain resolution (up to 7 days after treatment)
Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Participants will record daily pain scores until complete pain resolution.
Daily until complete pain resolution (up to 7 days after treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Success Rate
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment
Clinical success will be evaluated based on pulp vitality, absence of spontaneous pain, absence of tenderness to percussion, absence of pathological mobility, and absence of radiographic periapical pathology.
6 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anh Chi PHAN, PhD, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in this study will be shared, including demographic characteristics, postoperative pain scores, dentin hypersensitivity scores, and clinical follow-up outcomes. All personal identifiers will be removed to protect participant confidentiality.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning 6 months following publication and will remain available for 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be provided to qualified researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal for secondary analyses or meta-analysis. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author by email and will be reviewed by the study investigators.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Biodentine

Subscribe