Comparative Outcomes of VR and In-person Interventions for Preschool-aged Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Comparative Outcomes of VR and In-person NDBI-informed Social Skills Interventions for Preschool-aged Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a virtual reality (VR)-based social skills intervention works as well as an in-person group intervention for improving social skills in preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) without intellectual disability. It will also examine how these two approaches may differ in their effects across different settings.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do children who receive the VR-based intervention show improvements in social skills over time? Are there differences in outcomes between children receiving the VR-based intervention and those receiving the in-person group intervention?

Researchers will compare a VR-based social skills intervention to an in-person group-based intervention with equivalent content to see if the mode of delivery affects treatment outcomes.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to either a VR-based intervention group or an in-person group intervention Participate in 8 weekly sessions, each lasting approximately 50 minutes Engage in structured, play-based social skills activities designed using naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention (NDBIs) principles Complete caregiver- and teacher-reported questionnaires before and after the intervention

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD); Autism Spectrum Disorder High-Functioning
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Virtual Reality-Based Social Skills Group Intervention; Behavioral: In-Person Social Skills Group Intervention

Detailed Description

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by differences in social interaction and communication, along with restricted or repetitive behavior patterns (American Psychiatric Association, 2022). These developmental differences typically emerge in early childhood and significantly impact early developmental trajectories and continue to affect individuals throughout life (Lord et al., 2018). Over the past two decades, the global prevalence has risen considerably, based on 2022 surveillance data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicating that one in 31 eight-year-old children received an ASD diagnosis, almost a fivefold increase since 2002 (Shaw et al., 2025), not only reflecting improved diagnostic practices and greater societal awareness of early developmental differences (Maenner et al., 2023), but also highlights the need to support worldwide autistic individuals (Zeidan et al., 2022).

Social communication difficulties represent one of the most impactful challenges for autistic children (Kasari & Rotheram-Fuller, 2007), and are associated with downstream consequences in academic functioning, peer relationships, and mental health (Bellini et al., 2007). A substantial proportion of autistic children have age-appropriate cognitive or language abilities, yet still display marked difficulties in social cognition, play skills, and emotion regulation (Lee & Park, 2007; Liss et al., 2001). Differences in social engagement between autistic children with age-appropriate cognitive abilities and their typically developing peers become increasingly apparent during early childhood, including lower frequency of peer interaction, challenges in interpreting social cues, and difficulties maintaining conversations (McConnell, 2002; Barry et al., 2003). These challenges often become more pronounced upon school entry, when social demands increase and unstructured peer interactions become more complex (Koegel et al., 2013). Thus, preschool social skills intervention is viewed as a critical strategy for preventing later social isolation and school adjustment difficulties (Barnhill, 2007; Dawson et al., 2010; Landa, 2008).

Group-based social skills interventions are frequently used in early-intervention and clinical settings because they offer natural peer contexts, opportunities for observational learning, and embedded practice within dynamic social routines. (Barry et al., 2003; Capes et al., 2019; Gates et al., 2017). Systematic reviews and randomized trials report moderate effects for group-based social interventions for young autistic children (Freitag et al., 2016; Gates et al., 2017; Wolstencroft et al., 2018). Despite these benefits, many existing programs rely on discrete, theme-based instruction structures that target one skill at a time and often incorporate didactic teaching (Kasari et al., 2015; Radley et al., 2020; Tripathi et al., 2022). Such formats may limit opportunities for repeated, contextualized practice and may reduce flexibility in responding to children's moment-to-moment social engagement, constraining generalization and maintenance of gains (Babb et al., 2020). Access to early social-communication intervention is also inconsistent across regions and service systems, particularly in settings facing clinician shortages or limited availability of structured group programs. (Stahmer et al., 2005; Vismara & Rogers, 2010). These challenges underline the need for feasible, ecologically valid intervention models that can increase children's opportunities for naturalistic social learning.

Two emerging approaches may address these challenges. Virtual reality (VR), particularly through head-mounted displays (HMDs), has become a promising platform for delivering social and communication skill interventions to autistic individuals (Karami et al., 2021). VR provides immersive, structured, and engaging environments in which autistic individuals can practice social scenarios with reduced real-world unpredictability (Parsons & Cobb, 2016; Wallace et al., 2017). A systematic review has demonstrated that VR-based interventions can enhance attention, social skills, emotional skills, and communication abilities (Mesa-Gresa et al., 2018). In parallel, Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) have become one of the most well-established evidence-based approaches for young autistic children, integrating developmental principles and applied behavior analysis within child-led, context-embedded activities that support social engagement, emotional regulation, and flexible learning across related skill domains (Sandbank et al., 2020; Schreibman et al., 2015). NDBIs have been adapted into group formats to enhance ecological validity and cost-effectiveness, while providing more opportunities for peer interaction and naturalistic social learning (Tiede & Walton, 2019; Vivanti et al., 2017). Integrating NDBIs principles into VR may be particularly valuable, as VR environments can embed naturalistic interaction opportunities while maintaining consistency and controllability. However, empirical applications of NDBI-informed approaches within VR remain limited (Dechsling et al., 2022). To address this gap, our interdisciplinary research team developed an NDBI-informed VR social-skill intervention program for autistic preschool children without intellectual disabilities (ID), featuring immersive play-based scenarios and dynamic prompting tailored to children's behavioral cues (Wu et al., 2023; NSTC 112-2218-E-008-016). Preliminary single-group findings suggested improvements in children's social behaviors (Lin et al., 2024).

Although VR offers consistency and high practice density, its interactions remain constrained by preprogrammed structures. In contrast, in-person group programs allow clinicians to provide highly flexible, moment-to-moment adjustments in response to children's spontaneous behaviors and peer dynamics. Recent reviews indicate the scarcity of direct comparisons between VR-based interventions and equivalent in-person social-skills group programs, leaving it unclear whether the two modalities produce comparable therapeutic benefits (Dechsling et al., 2021). Understanding these differences is critical for determining how alternative delivery formats support engagement and learning in early intervention contexts, particularly as service systems explore more flexible or scalable models of intervention (Simacek et al., 2021). Building upon this rationale, the present study compares two delivery modalities: (1) the VR-HMD system and (2) an in-person, clinical psychologist-led group intervention directly adapted from the VR curriculum. The in-person version retained the session structure and therapeutic principle of the original VR curriculum, allowing a direct comparison of delivery format. In addition, because social-communication skills may be expressed differently across home and school contexts, the present study incorporated both caregiver and teacher reports to capture cross-contextual outcomes and informant-specific patterns, and to compare outcomes and clinical utility between VR-mediated and in-person group interventions to inform flexible and scalable service models for autistic preschoolers without ID.

This study adopted a randomized two-arm design to compare two delivery formats of a social-emotional skills intervention for autistic preschoolers. Participants were recruited from the pediatric and child psychiatry departments of a university-affiliated medical center in Southern Taiwan. Thirty-two children between 4 and 6 years 11 months of age who were clinically diagnosed or suspected to be autistic were enrolled following referral by licensed pediatric and child psychiatrists with DSM-5 criteria. Eligibility was determined through a multi-step diagnostic evaluation, including (1) clinical judgment by a licensed psychiatrist, (2) scores ≥15 on the Checklist for Autism Spectrum Disorder-Chinese version (CASD-C), and (3) meeting ASD classification on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2). Cognitive functioning was evaluated using the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, the Fourth Edition (WPPSI-IV), and only children with Full-Scale IQ and Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) scores above 70 were included. Exclusion criteria included (1) significant sensory or motor impairments (e.g., visual or hearing impairments, severe physical disabilities), (2) known genetic or neurological conditions (e.g., epilepsy, fragile X syndrome, traumatic brain injury), or (3) behavioral profiles that would preclude participation in a group-based setting (e.g., severe aggression). After enrollment, participants were randomly assigned to either the VR-based intervention group or the in-person group intervention, with 16 children in each condition. The two intervention formats were matched in terms of session number, duration, content, and implementation of NDBI-informed strategies.

The outcome measures, including social and adaptive behaviors, were administered at baseline (Time 1, T1) and immediately after completion of the full-course intervention (Time 2, T2).

The intervention comprised eight weekly sessions, each lasting approximately 50 minutes, delivered through two modalities: a virtual reality (VR)-based format and an in-person group format. Both formats followed the same NDBI-informed curriculum and session scripts, ensuring equivalence in therapeutic goals, activity structure, prompting hierarchies, and reinforcement strategies. All sessions were organized around integrated, play-based activities, in which multiple core social-emotional competencies were targeted simultaneously, including social initiation and response (e.g., eye contact, calling peers by name, and seeking attention appropriately), behavioral regulation (e.g., turn-taking, impulse control), and emotion recognition and regulation (e.g., identifying feelings, responding to distress).

Across both modalities, sessions used developmentally appropriate, game-based activities that embedded opportunities for naturalistic social learning. Activities included ball-toss games, card games, block-building tasks, and a final board-game review. A dice-rolling routine was used to select activities to increase engagement and give children a sense of autonomy. Naturally occurring events, such as disagreements, rule violations, waiting, or emotional frustration, were used as teachable moments to model emotional awareness, flexible thinking, and simple problem-solving strategies. Systematic prompting and prompt fading were applied across all activities to support increasing independence. Caregivers received a structured home-practice worksheet after each session to facilitate skill generalization across daily routines.

Children in the VR intervention group participated in an immersive head-mounted display program originally developed by Wu et al. (2023) and adapted for the present study. The system presented cartoon-based classroom- and playground-like environments in which children interacted with peer avatars during structured social tasks. All instructional prompts, feedback, and graded support were preprogrammed based on NDBI principles. The system incorporated multimodal sensing functions, including eye-tracking to monitor children's visual attention and respiration monitoring to support deep-breathing practice during emotion regulation exercises. These signals inform system-generated prompts and graded challenge levels. Sessions were supervised externally by a trained graduate student in clinical psychology, whose role was limited to assisting children in operating and adapting to the VR equipment and ensuring safety. All instructional cues, prompts, and feedback during the activities were provided solely by the VR system. At the end of each session, caregivers received a brief summary of the session goals to support their understanding of the targeted skills by the graduate student. This feedback was concise and focused on the activity objectives, as teaching prompts and behavioral supports were fully delivered by the VR system.

For the in-person intervention group, the same core curriculum was delivered, with each session involving four preschoolers and two trained group leaders: a licensed clinical psychologist and a well-trained graduate student in clinical psychology, both receiving weekly supervision from a senior licensed clinical psychologist who also served as the primary developer of the VR curriculum, ensuring consistency between the VR-based and in-person adaptations. Group leaders implemented individualized scaffolding based on children's performance levels, using a range of naturalistic teaching strategies including live modeling, verbal and visual prompts, praise, and contingent feedback. They also provided moment-to-moment adjustments based on children's spontaneous behaviors and peer dynamics. At the end of each session, caregivers received individualized feedback from group leaders regarding their child's participation and social-emotional behaviors during the session. This feedback also allowed caregivers to raise questions, and group leaders provided practical suggestions to support skill generalization at home.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 32
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Taiwan
  • Tainan City
    • Tainan, Tainan City, Taiwan, 701
      • National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Children aged 4 to under 7 years
• Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) ≥ 70 and Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) ≥ 70
• Score ≥ 15 on the Checklist for Autism Spectrum Disorder-Chinese Version (CASD-C)
• Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder based on Autism Diagnostic -Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2)
• Clinical diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder by a licensed clinician

Exclusion Criteria:

• Significant sensory or motor impairments (e.g., severe visual or hearing impairments, major physical disabilities)
• Known genetic or neurological conditions (e.g., epilepsy, fragile X syndrome, traumatic brain injury)
• Severe behavioral or emotional problems that would interfere with participation in interventions

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual Reality Social Skills Group Intervention; Participants receive a virtual reality (VR)-based social skills intervention grounded in Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs). The program consists of 8 weekly sessions (approximately 50 minutes each) delivered in an immersive virtual environment. The intervention includes structured social interaction scenarios, hierarchical prompting, and individualized feedback to support the development of social communication and emotional regulation skills.	Behavioral: Virtual Reality-Based Social Skills Group Intervention; This intervention is a virtual reality (VR)-based social skills training program grounded in Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs). The program consists of 8 weekly sessions (approximately 50 minutes each) delivered via a head-mounted display in an immersive virtual environment. The intervention incorporates structured social interaction scenarios, hierarchical prompting, prompt fading, and individualized reinforcement. Real-time feedback is provided based on participant responses to support the development of social communication, emotional understanding, and behavioral regulation. The intervention content, session structure, and therapeutic principles are designed to be equivalent to the in-person intervention condition.; Other Names: NDBIs-informed Social Skills Group Intervention
Active Comparator: In-Person Social Skills Group Intervention; Participants receive an in-person group-based social skills intervention grounded in Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs). The program consists of 8 weekly sessions (approximately 50 minutes each), with matched content, session structure, prompting strategies, and reinforcement principles to ensure equivalence with the VR intervention.	Behavioral: In-Person Social Skills Group Intervention; This intervention is an in-person group-based social skills training program grounded in Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs). The program consists of 8 weekly sessions (approximately 50 minutes each), conducted in small groups and led by trained clinicians. The intervention includes naturalistic social interaction activities, hierarchical prompting, prompt fading, and individualized reinforcement. Therapists provide real-time modeling, feedback, and scaffolding based on participants' responses. The intervention content, session structure, and therapeutic principles are matched to those of the VR-based intervention to ensure equivalence across conditions.; Other Names: NDBIs-informed In-Person Social Skills Group Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2)	The Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2; Constantino & Gruber, 2005) was used to assess social awareness, social communication, and restricted behaviors. The SRS-2 demonstrates high internal consistency (α = 0.94-0.97) and acceptable convergent validity (r = 0.64-0.86). In our study, SRS-2 is a caregiver- and teacher-reported measure assessing social impairment associated with autism spectrum disorder. The total score reflects overall social responsiveness, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Changes from baseline to post-intervention will be analyzed.	Pre-intervention (baseline) and immediately post-intervention (8 weeks)
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (VABS-3) Communication and Socialization Domains	The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (VABS-3, Chinese version; Sparrow et al., 2016; Chang et al., 2020) was administered to evaluate adaptive functioning across communication, daily living skills, and socialization. The Chinese version demonstrates strong reliability (split-half α = 0.87-0.99) and construct validity (0.48-0.93). In the present study, analyses focused on the Communication and Socialization domains, reported by caregiver and teacher, which are most directly relevant to social-communication outcomes targeted by the intervention.	Pre-intervention (baseline) and immediately post-intervention (8 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
VABS-3 Maladaptive Behavior Index	The VABS-3 Maladaptive Behavior Index was included to evaluate changes in problem behaviors.	Pre-intervention (baseline) and immediately post-intervention (8 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Dawson G, Rogers S, Munson J, Smith M, Winter J, Greenson J, Donaldson A, Varley J. Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):e17-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0958. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
• Karami B, Koushki R, Arabgol F, Rahmani M, Vahabie AH. Effectiveness of Virtual/Augmented Reality-Based Therapeutic Interventions on Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 23;12:665326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.665326. eCollection 2021.
• Dechsling A, Orm S, Kalandadze T, Sutterlin S, Oien RA, Shic F, Nordahl-Hansen A. Virtual and Augmented Reality in Social Skills Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Nov;52(11):4692-4707. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05338-5. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
• Kasari C, Gulsrud A, Paparella T, Hellemann G, Berry K. Randomized comparative efficacy study of parent-mediated interventions for toddlers with autism. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):554-63. doi: 10.1037/a0039080. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
• Lord C, Elsabbagh M, Baird G, Veenstra-Vanderweele J. Autism spectrum disorder. Lancet. 2018 Aug 11;392(10146):508-520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31129-2. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
• Maenner MJ, Warren Z, Williams AR, Amoakohene E, Bakian AV, Bilder DA, Durkin MS, Fitzgerald RT, Furnier SM, Hughes MM, Ladd-Acosta CM, McArthur D, Pas ET, Salinas A, Vehorn A, Williams S, Esler A, Grzybowski A, Hall-Lande J, Nguyen RHN, Pierce K, Zahorodny W, Hudson A, Hallas L, Mancilla KC, Patrick M, Shenouda J, Sidwell K, DiRienzo M, Gutierrez J, Spivey MH, Lopez M, Pettygrove S, Schwenk YD, Washington A, Shaw KA. Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2020. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 Mar 24;72(2):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7202a1.
• Zeidan J, Fombonne E, Scorah J, Ibrahim A, Durkin MS, Saxena S, Yusuf A, Shih A, Elsabbagh M. Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update. Autism Res. 2022 May;15(5):778-790. doi: 10.1002/aur.2696. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
• Tripathi I, Estabillo JA, Moody CT, Laugeson EA. Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of PEERS(R) for Preschoolers: A Parent-Mediated Social Skills Training Program for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jun;52(6):2610-2626. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05147-w. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
• Zhao, J.-C., Wu, Y.-H., Cao, G.-W., & Chen, M.-Z. (2017). Checklist for Autism Spectrum Disorder-Chinese Version (CASD-C): Administration manual. Psychological Publishing Co.
• Wolstencroft J, Robinson L, Srinivasan R, Kerry E, Mandy W, Skuse D. A Systematic Review of Group Social Skills Interventions, and Meta-analysis of Outcomes, for Children with High Functioning ASD. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Jul;48(7):2293-2307. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3485-1.
• Watkins MW, Beaujean AA. Bifactor structure of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence--Fourth Edition. Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Mar;29(1):52-63. doi: 10.1037/spq0000038. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
• Wallace, S., Parsons, S., & Bailey, A. (2017). Self-reported sense of presence and responses to social stimuli by adolescents with autism spectrum disorder in a collaborative virtual reality environment. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 42(2), 131-141. doi:10.3109/13668250.2016.1234032
• Vismara LA, Rogers SJ. Behavioral treatments in autism spectrum disorder: what do we know? Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:447-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131151.
• Vivanti, G., Duncan, E., Dawson, G., & Rogers, S. J. (2017). Implementing the group-based Early Start Denver Model for preschoolers with autism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
• Tiede G, Walton KM. Meta-analysis of naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism. 2019 Nov;23(8):2080-2095. doi: 10.1177/1362361319836371. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
• Stahmer AC, Collings NM, Palinkas LA. Early Intervention Practices for Children With Autism: Descriptions From Community Providers. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2005;20(2):66-79. doi: 10.1177/10883576050200020301.
• Soares EE, Bausback K, Beard CL, Higinbotham M, Bunge EL, Gengoux GW. Social Skills Training for Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Meta-analysis of In-person and Technological Interventions. J Technol Behav Sci. 2021;6(1):166-180. doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00177-0. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
• Simacek J, Elmquist M, Dimian AF, Reichle J. Current Trends in Telehealth Applications to Deliver Social Communication Interventions for Young Children with or at Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2021;8(1):15-23. doi: 10.1007/s40474-020-00214-w. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
• Shaw KA, Williams S, Patrick ME, Valencia-Prado M, Durkin MS, Howerton EM, Ladd-Acosta CM, Pas ET, Bakian AV, Bartholomew P, Nieves-Munoz N, Sidwell K, Alford A, Bilder DA, DiRienzo M, Fitzgerald RT, Furnier SM, Hudson AE, Pokoski OM, Shea L, Tinker SC, Warren Z, Zahorodny W, Agosto-Rosa H, Anbar J, Chavez KY, Esler A, Forkner A, Grzybowski A, Agib AH, Hallas L, Lopez M, Magana S, Nguyen RHN, Parker J, Pierce K, Protho T, Torres H, Vanegas SB, Vehorn A, Zhang M, Andrews J, Greer F, Hall-Lande J, McArthur D, Mitamura M, Montes AJ, Pettygrove S, Shenouda J, Skowyra C, Washington A, Maenner MJ. Prevalence and Early Identification of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 4 and 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 16 Sites, United States, 2022. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Apr 17;74(2):1-22. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7402a1.
• Seng GJ, Chiu YN, Tsai WC, Lin HY, Li SC, Hsiao MN, Liu TJ, Chen HM, Shih A, Chang YC, Who Cst Team, Soong WT. Promotion and implementation effectiveness of World Health Organization's Caregiver Skills Training program in Taiwan. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 31;13:904380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.904380. eCollection 2022.
• Schreibman L, Dawson G, Stahmer AC, Landa R, Rogers SJ, McGee GG, Kasari C, Ingersoll B, Kaiser AP, Bruinsma Y, McNerney E, Wetherby A, Halladay A. Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions: Empirically Validated Treatments for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Aug;45(8):2411-28. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8.
• Sandbank M, Bottema-Beutel K, Crowley S, Cassidy M, Dunham K, Feldman JI, Crank J, Albarran SA, Raj S, Mahbub P, Woynaroski TG. Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children. Psychol Bull. 2020 Jan;146(1):1-29. doi: 10.1037/bul0000215. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
• Moore HL, Couteur AL, Charman T, Green J, Parr JR, Grahame V. What is the concordance between parent- and education professional-reported adaptive functioning in autistic children using the VABS-II? J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Aug;53(8):3077-3091. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05602-2. Epub 2022 May 17.
• Mittal P, Bhadania M, Tondak N, Ajmera P, Yadav S, Kukreti A, Kalra S, Ajmera P. Effect of immersive virtual reality-based training on cognitive, social, and emotional skills in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Res Dev Disabil. 2024 Aug;151:104771. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104771. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
• Mesa-Gresa P, Gil-Gomez H, Lozano-Quilis JA, Gil-Gomez JA. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 1;18(8):2486. doi: 10.3390/s18082486.
• McConnell SR. Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Oct;32(5):351-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1020537805154.
• Mayes SD. Brief Report: Checklist for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Most Discriminating Items for Diagnosing Autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Mar;48(3):935-939. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3401-0.
• Liss M, Harel B, Fein D, Allen D, Dunn M, Feinstein C, Morris R, Waterhouse L, Rapin I. Predictors and correlates of adaptive functioning in children with developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Apr;31(2):219-30. doi: 10.1023/a:1010707417274.
• Landa RJ. Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders in the first 3 years of life. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008 Mar;4(3):138-47. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0731. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
• Lane, B. R., Paynter, J., & Sharman, R. (2013). Parent and teacher ratings of adaptive and challenging behaviours in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(10), 1196-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.07.011
• Koegel, L. K., Ashbaugh, K., Koegel, R. L., Detar, W. J., & Regester, A. (2013). Increasing socialization in adults with Asperger's syndrome. Psychology in the Schools, 50(9), 899-909. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21715
• Kasari, C., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2007). Peer Relationships of children with autism: Challenges and interventions. In E. Hollander & E. Anagnostou (Eds.), Clinical manual for the treatment of autism (pp. 235-257). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc..
• Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 5.0. U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
• Gunning, C., Breathnach, Ó., Holloway, J., McTiernan, A., & Malone, B. (2019). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder in inclusive settings. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6(1), 40-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0153-5
• Gotham K, Risi S, Pickles A, Lord C. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Apr;37(4):613-27. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0280-1. Epub 2006 Dec 16.
• Gates JA, Kang E, Lerner MD. Efficacy of group social skills interventions for youth with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;52:164-181. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
• Freitag CM, Jensen K, Elsuni L, Sachse M, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Schulte-Ruther M, Hanig S, von Gontard A, Poustka L, Schad-Hansjosten T, Wenzl C, Sinzig J, Taurines R, Geissler J, Kieser M, Cholemkery H. Group-based cognitive behavioural psychotherapy for children and adolescents with ASD: the randomized, multicentre, controlled SOSTA-net trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 May;57(5):596-605. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12509. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
• Dickson KS, Suhrheinrich J, Rieth SR, Stahmer AC. Parent and Teacher Concordance of Child Outcomes for Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 May;48(5):1423-1435. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3382-z.
• Dechsling A, Shic F, Zhang D, Marschik PB, Esposito G, Orm S, Sutterlin S, Kalandadze T, Oien RA, Nordahl-Hansen A. Virtual reality and naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Apr;111:103885. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103885. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
• Billard A, Robins B, Nadel J, Dautenhahn K. Building Robota, a mini-humanoid robot for the rehabilitation of children with autism. Assist Technol. 2007 Spring;19(1):37-49. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2007.10131864.
• Bigham S, Boucher J, Mayes A, Anns S. Assessing recollection and familiarity in autistic spectrum disorders: methods and findings. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Jul;40(7):878-89. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0937-7.
• Bellani M, Fornasari L, Chittaro L, Brambilla P. Virtual reality in autism: state of the art. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Sep;20(3):235-8. doi: 10.1017/s2045796011000448.
• Barry TD, Klinger LG, Lee JM, Palardy N, Gilmore T, Bodin SD. Examining the effectiveness of an outpatient clinic-based social skills group for high-functioning children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003 Dec;33(6):685-701. doi: 10.1023/b:jadd.0000006004.86556.e0.
• Achenbach TM. Commentary: Definitely more than measurement error: but how should we understand and deal with informant discrepancies? J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(1):80-6. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533416.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 6, 2023
• Primary Completion (Actual): October 31, 2025
• Study Completion (Actual): October 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 11, 2026
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 11, 2026
• First Posted (Actual): May 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 18, 2026
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 11, 2026
• Last Verified: April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: virtual reality; preschool children; Social Skills; Head-mounted display; Autism spectrum disorder; Group-based intervention; Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Neurodevelopmental Disorders; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Behavior; Social Behavior; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Social Skills
• Other Study ID Numbers: NCKU_IBM_TLL_ASD_VR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED
• IPD Plan Description: Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plans have not yet been determined. Data sharing may be considered in the future upon reasonable request, subject to ethical approval, data protection regulations, and institutional policies.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No