- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07595614
NLP Analysis of Weekly Narratives for Dynamic Clinical Assessment in SUD (DYNA-NLP)
Analysis of Weekly Narratives Using Natural Language Processing in Patients Undergoing Residential Rehabilitation: A Hybrid Approach for the Dynamic Assessment of Clinical Processes
This prospective observational study follows adults undergoing residential rehabilitation for severe substance use disorders at a specialized treatment center in Mexico. Participants provide weekly written narratives describing their emotions, challenges, coping strategies, and treatment experiences, and complete validated psychological questionnaires every two weeks, including the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS), Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-8 (ATQ-8), and Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS).
The study applies natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning methods to analyze participants' narratives and identify emotional, cognitive, and behavioral patterns associated with clinical change over time. Narrative-derived features are combined with questionnaire scores to generate a dynamic clinical risk representation that may help detect early signs of psychological worsening or improvement during residential treatment.
Participants continue receiving standard residential care, and the study does not modify treatment decisions or clinical interventions. Up to 35 participants with sufficient longitudinal follow-up data will be included in the primary analysis. Data collection is expected to continue through September 2026.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients undergoing treatment for substance use disorders frequently describe changes in mood, motivation, hopelessness, cognitive rigidity, emotional distress, and coping strategies through spontaneous written language. These narratives may contain clinically meaningful indicators associated with psychological deterioration, treatment progress, or relapse vulnerability. However, systematic manual analysis of longitudinal written narratives is difficult to implement in routine clinical practice because of the volume and complexity of the data.
Recent developments in natural language processing (NLP), representation learning, and deep learning provide methods for extracting quantitative linguistic and semantic information from written text. Integrating these features with repeated psychometric assessments may support the development of longitudinal models capable of characterizing changes in mental health status over time in patients receiving residential addiction treatment.
Objectives
The objectives of this study are:
To extract semantic, emotional, and linguistic features from weekly patient narratives using NLP methods, including sentence embeddings, sentiment and emotion classification, and semantic similarity analyses based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) constructs.
To integrate narrative-derived variables with repeated psychometric measures (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS), Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-8 (ATQ-8), and Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS)) using a multimodal deep learning autoencoder capable of generating a low-dimensional representation of longitudinal clinical status.
To evaluate whether latent representations generated by the autoencoder are associated with periods of clinical worsening or clinical improvement across time using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation procedures.
To develop a dynamic longitudinal risk representation capable of estimating future changes in automatic negative thoughts, measured through subsequent ATQ-8 scores.
Study Design
This study is a prospective observational cohort conducted at a single residential rehabilitation center in Mexico.
Eligible participants are adults aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of severe substance use disorder who are admitted for residential treatment. Individuals with active psychotic symptoms or cognitive impairment that substantially interferes with the ability to complete written narratives are excluded.
Participants complete:
Weekly digital written narratives using open-ended prompts focused on emotions, challenges, coping responses, interpersonal experiences, and perceived treatment progress.
Biweekly administration of the following validated self-report instruments:
GAD-7
EROS
ATQ-8
BADS
All information is collected through digital forms integrated into routine clinical monitoring procedures at the treatment center.
Participants may contribute data for up to 20 weeks, depending on duration of residential stay. The study began on 25 May 2025, and primary completion is anticipated in September 2026.
Up to 35 participants with sufficient longitudinal observations will be included in the primary analytic cohort.
NLP and Machine Learning Pipeline
Text preprocessing
Narratives are written in Spanish and undergo preprocessing procedures that include:
minimum length filtering, normalization, consolidation of narrative fields into a single weekly text sample, tokenization and linguistic annotation.
Feature extraction
Narrative features include:
Sentiment classification (positive, neutral, negative) Emotion probabilities for joy, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, and disgust using the pysentimiento library
Linguistic variables including:
type-token ratio, mean sentence length, proportion of first-person pronouns, proportion of past-tense verbs, obtained through udpipe
Semantic similarity measures between patient narratives and ACT-related prototype domains including:
experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, rule-governed behavior, helplessness, achievement orientation, hopefulness
Semantic similarity is computed through cosine similarity between sentence-transformer embeddings and predefined prototype centroids.
Dimensionality reduction procedures using principal component analysis (PCA) are applied to selected linguistic and semantic variables to derive a principal component representing orientation toward internal emotional experience versus external contextual events.
Autoencoder Architecture
The multimodal model receives concatenated longitudinal feature vectors after robust scaling.
The architecture includes:
a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) encoder, multi-head attention mechanisms, variational regularization using a β-variational autoencoder (β-VAE) framework, a decoder trained to reconstruct the original temporal feature sequence, and an auxiliary classification component predicting next-period clinical worsening.
The training objective combines:
mean squared reconstruction error, focal loss for classification, Kullback-Leibler divergence, and optional temporal smoothness regularization.
Model performance is evaluated using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation procedures. A final model may subsequently be trained using the complete dataset.
Primary Analyses
Primary analyses include:
evaluation of discriminative performance for prediction of subsequent clinical worsening using: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) examination of associations between latent trajectory representations and longitudinal psychometric changes, development of a Composite Clinical Risk Index (CCRI) derived from latent representations, and comparison of CCRI trajectories with weeks classified as clinical worsening according to predefined multimodal criteria.
Ethics and Dissemination
The study has received approval from the institutional review board of Under The Tree Miller A.C.
All participants provide written informed consent prior to participation.
Participation does not alter or replace standard residential treatment. All clinical decisions remain under the responsibility of treating professionals independent of study procedures.
Study findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals regardless of outcome. De-identified datasets and analysis code may be made available upon reasonable request and in accordance with institutional and ethical requirements.
Recruitment Status
Recruitment is ongoing. Final data collection for the primary outcome is anticipated in September 2026.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ricardo Fernandez
- Phone Number: +52 1 33 1544 5474
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lauro Gutiérrez Castro
- Phone Number: +523314696107
- Email: saraqael_sefer@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Jalisco
-
Potrerillos, Jalisco, Mexico, 45815
- Recruiting
- Under The Tree Potrerillos
-
Contact:
- Lauro Gutiérrez Castro
- Phone Number: +523314696107
- Email: saraqael_sefer@hotmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of severe substance use disorder (polydrug use, including cocaine, methamphetamines, alcohol, and/or cannabis), confirmed by the center's admission assessment.
- Male sex (all participants in the center's residential program are male).
- Age 18 years or older.
- Current resident of the participating residential rehabilitation center in Mexico.
- Completed at least four weeks of residential treatment at the time of study enrollment.
- Able to write coherent weekly narratives in Spanish (no severe cognitive impairment or active psychosis).
- Willing to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of acute psychotic symptoms that interfere with the ability to write or understand the study procedures.
- Severe cognitive impairment (e.g., due to traumatic brain injury, intellectual disability) that prevents meaningful narrative production.
- Inability to comply with weekly narrative writing (e.g., illiteracy, severe visual impairment).
- Planned discharge from the residential program within less than 4 weeks from enrollment.
- Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial that could confound the interpretation of outcomes.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Residential rehabilitation cohort
Adult men (≥18 years) with severe substance use disorder, admitted to a residential rehabilitation center in Mexico.
All participants receive the center's standard, multimodal treatment program, which includes group therapy, individual counseling, occupational activities, 12-step facilitation, and relapse prevention education.
The study does not assign, modify, or withhold any component of this program.
Participants are followed prospectively for the duration of their stay (10-20 weeks).
|
Participants follow the standard residential rehabilitation program provided by the center.
This is a naturalistic exposure; the study does not impose any additional intervention.
The "intervention" of interest is the routine therapeutic environment and its associated psychological processes (e.g., changes in avoidance, cognitive fusion, hope, and behavioral activation).
These processes are measured through weekly written narratives and biweekly validated clinical scales (GAD-7, EROS, ATQ-8, BADS).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in negative automatic thoughts measured by the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire 8-item version
Time Frame: Every 2 weeks from baseline until discharge from residential treatment (up to 20 weeks)
|
The Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire 8-item version is administered every two weeks.
Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating more frequent negative automatic thoughts.
The primary outcome is the change from baseline in total score over the course of residential treatment.
|
Every 2 weeks from baseline until discharge from residential treatment (up to 20 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in generalized anxiety symptoms measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 item scale
Time Frame: Every 2 weeks from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale is administered every two weeks.
Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.
|
Every 2 weeks from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
|
Change in environmental reward measured by the Environmental Reward Observation Scale
Time Frame: Every 2 weeks from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
The Environmental Reward Observation Scale iis administered every two weeks.
Total scores range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater exposure to positive environmental reinforcement.
|
Every 2 weeks from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
|
Change in behavioral activation and avoidance measured by the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale
Time Frame: Every 2 weeks from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale is administered every two weeks.
Higher scores on the Activation subscale indicate greater engagement in goal-directed activity; higher scores on the Avoidance/Rumination subscale indicate greater behavioral avoidance and rumination.
|
Every 2 weeks from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
|
Weekly self-reported emotional intensity
Time Frame: Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
Participants report the intensity of their predominant weekly emotion on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale, where higher scores indicate greater emotional intensity.
|
Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
|
Weekly self-reported craving intensity
Time Frame: Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
Participants rate average craving for substance use during the prior week on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale, where higher scores indicate greater craving intensity.
|
Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Narrative sentiment valence index derived from weekly written narratives
Time Frame: Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
Sentiment valence is calculated from weekly written narratives using a validated Spanish-language sentiment classification model.
Scores range from -1 to +1, with lower scores indicating more negative emotional valence.
|
Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
|
Semantic similarity to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-related constructs
Time Frame: Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
Semantic similarity scores are computed between weekly narratives and prototype domains (e.g., experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion) using sentence embedding methods.
Scores range from 0 to 1 (higher = greater similarity).
|
Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
|
Composite Clinical Risk Index derived from longitudinal narrative features
Time Frame: Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
A composite longitudinal risk score is a composite longitudinal risk score calculated using multiple narrative-derived emotional variability indicators.
Higher scores indicate greater estimated clinical vulnerability over time.
|
Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
|
Linguistic markers extracted from weekly written narratives
Time Frame: Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
Linguistic variables including lexical diversity (type-token ratio), first-person pronoun frequency, and past-tense verb proportion are extracted from weekly written narratives using automated natural language processing (NLP) procedures.
|
Weekly from baseline until discharge (up to 20 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lauro Gutiérrez Castro, Under The Tree
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SISAP-TUS-HYB/WN-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anxiety
-
University of CalabriaNot yet recruitingAnxiety | Anxiety Disease | Anxiety and Distress | Public Speaking AnxietyItaly
-
Boston Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Boston University; Johns Hopkins... and other collaboratorsCompletedAnxiety Disorders | Anxiety | Anxiety Symptoms | Child Anxiety | Anxiety, Mild to Moderate | Pediatric Anxiety DisordersUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | Anxiety Disorder of Childhood | Separation Anxiety Disorder of Childhood | Social Anxiety Disorder of ChildhoodUnited States
-
Clinica Alemana de SantiagoUniversidad del DesarrolloRecruitingAnxiety | Induction of Anesthesia | Anxiety Preoperative | Technology Use | Child Anxiety | Anesthesia Care | Anxiety After SurgeryChile
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityRecruitingAnxiety | Parental AnxietyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of CincinnatiActive, not recruitingAnxiety, Separation | Anxiety, Social | Anxiety, GeneralizedUnited States
-
AstraZenecaCompletedAnxiety Disorders | Anxiety | Anxiety Neuroses | Anxiety StatesUnited States
-
Florida State UniversityRecruitingAnxiety | Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) | WorryingUnited States
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Active, not recruitingAnxiety Disorders | Anxiety | Anxiety and FearFrance
-
Prisma Health-UpstateCompletedAnxiety | Anxiety, Separation | Separation Anxiety | Anxiety Generalized
Clinical Trials on Residential rehabilitation as usual
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentVA Boston Healthcare System; Center for Biostatistics and Health Data ScienceCompletedPTSD | Substance Use DisordersUnited States
-
New York UniversityCompletedSubstance Use DisordersUnited States
-
Lund UniversityRecruitingBreast Neoplasms | Rehabilitation | Psychological DistressSweden
-
Hans Joergen SoegaardCompletedMental DisordersDenmark
-
Karolinska InstitutetForteCompleted
-
University of British ColumbiaUnknownConcussion | Sport-related Concussion | Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI)Canada
-
University of ManchesterUniversity of Liverpool; National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom and other collaboratorsCompletedDepression | Anxiety | Cardiac RehabilitationUnited Kingdom
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation...University of Manchester; National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom and other collaboratorsRecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Valve Diseases | Cardiomyopathies | Congenital Heart Disease | Cardiac Arrythmias | Cerebrovascular EventUnited Kingdom
-
Umeå UniversitySwedish Council for Working Life and Social ResearchRecruitingPsychosis | Autism | Severe Mental Disorder | Psychiatric or Mood Diseases or Conditions | Neuropsychiatric SyndromeSweden