F@ce 2.0 - Information and Communication Technology-based Rehabilitation Intervention After Stroke in Sweden

March 11, 2024 updated by: Susanne Guidetti, Karolinska Institutet

F@ce 2.0 - Implementation and Evaluation of a Model for a Person-centred, Information and Communication Technology and Team Based Rehabilitation Intervention for People Who Have Had Stroke in Sweden

The purpose of the present proposal is to implement and evaluate a new model for mobile phone supported and family-centred rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0) with regard to functioning in activities in daily living and participation in everyday life among persons with stroke and their families in rural and urban areas in Sweden.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators' previous feasibility study suggested beneficial effects on occupational performance and satisfaction of a mobile phone supported and person-centred rehabilitation intervention (F@ce1.0) after stroke in Stockholm, Sweden. The purpose of the present proposal is to implement and evaluate F@ce 2.0 on functioning in activities in daily living (ADL) and participation in everyday life among persons with stroke and their significant others (someone identified by the person with stroke as close i.e.partner, friend, son, daughter).

With recommendations on evaluation of complex interventions both outcomes and processes will be studied and hence both quantitative and qualitative methods will be applied. In a randomized controlled trial F@ce 2.0 will be evaluated compared to ordinary rehabilitation in urban/rural Sweden regarding; self-efficacy, perceived performance and participation in everyday activities, independence in ADL, health care utilization and the families´ perceived participation in everyday activities. Qualitative data will explore experiences of people with stroke, significant others and rehabilitation staff of participating in F@ce 2.0. The research project has a multidisciplinary perspective for sustainable rehabilitation interventions, a prerequisite for better participation in everyday life for people with stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Avesta, Sweden
        • Avesta
      • Borlänge, Sweden
        • Borlänge hemrehab
      • Falun, Sweden
        • Falun hemrehab
      • Gävle, Sweden
        • Externa stroketeamet Gävle
      • Hudiksvall, Sweden
        • Externa stroketeamet Hudiksvall
      • Mora, Sweden
        • Mora hemrehab
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 112 19
        • Neuroteam Kungsholmen, Stockholms sjukhem
    • Bromma
      • Stockholm, Bromma, Sweden, 168 62
        • Primärvårdsrehab Bromma, Stockholms Sjukhem
    • Gustavsberg
      • Stockholm, Gustavsberg, Sweden, 134 40
        • Neuroteam Värmdö Rehab
    • Handen
      • Stockholm, Handen, Sweden, 136 46
        • Aleris Rudans rehab Haninge
    • Skärholmen
      • Stockholm, Skärholmen, Sweden, 127 48
        • Aleris Rehab Skärholmen Neuroteam
    • Älvsjö
      • Stockholm, Älvsjö, Sweden, 125 44
        • Aleris Rehab Älvsjö Neuroteam

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persons who have had a stroke
  • Enrolled in one of the participating home rehabilitation teams in Stockholm and Dalarna
  • Able to participate in eight weeks of intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to formulate activity goals
  • Inability to express themselves in Swedish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation
Participants in the intervention group will receive an 8-week mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0)
Participants in the intervention group will receive an 8-week mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0).The participants will be introduced to a problem-solving strategy intended to facilitate the learning and problem-solving process to be used during the intervention. The strategy will provide a structure for healthcare professionals delivering the intervention. Three goals in daily activities will be formulated that the person wants and needs to do within the home environment. Each activity will be practiced together with the healthcare professionals and significant others. The significant others will be informed about the participant's goals and the planned strategies for reaching the goals. The participants will practice the activities in their home environment supported by mobile phone calls and text messages. In addition they will be given information about stroke.
Active Comparator: Rehabilitation as usual
Control group participants will receive rehabilitation as usual and in addition information about stroke.
Control group participants will receive rehabilitation as usual and in addition information about stroke.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Participants are instructed to rate how confident they feel about performing each of 16 everyday activities on a 10-point rating scale ranging from 1) "not confident at all in my ability" to 10) "very confident in my ability". The average of all responses are calculated
Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) measures performance and satisfaction in self-care, productivity and leisure from the individual's perspective. The participant is asked 1) to rate performance of the specified activities using a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale and 2) to score his or her satisfaction with that performance using the same scale. Weighted scores of the chosen activities are added separately for performance and satisfaction to create two summative scores. The summative scores are then divided by the number of rated activities to provide COPM scores.
Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Caregiver Burden Scale
Time Frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Questionnaire that consists of 22 items for different types of subjective caregiver burden, covering areas of the caregiver's health, feelings of psychological well-being, relations, social network, physical workload, and environmental aspects. The items are scored on a scale from 1 to 4 and the higher the score the greater the burden.
Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0
Time Frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Assesses the perceived impact on functioning in everyday life in eight domains: Strength, Memory and thinking, Emotions, Communication, ADL/ Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), Mobility, Hand function and Participation. The SIS includes 59 items within these eight domains. Aggregated scores ranges from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the lower the perceived impact of stroke, i.e. fewer problems in everyday life. The SIS 3.0 also includes a question to assess the participant's global perception of recovery presented in a vertical analogue scale ranging from '0 = no recovery to 100 = full recovery'
Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Frenchay Activities Index
Time Frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Questionnaire consisting of 15 items on frequency of social everyday activities and the score is based on the frequency with which an activity has been performed during the previous 3 or 6 months. The total score ranges from 0 (inactive) to 45 (very active).
Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Fatigue Severity Scale-7
Time Frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Questionnaire that assesses fatigue. The final score is the mean of the seven items graded between 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree). Scores are categorized as no fatigue (1-3) or fatigue (4-7)
Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Questionnaire that assesses anxiety and depression comprising two subscales, each ranging from 0-21. Scores are categorised as no anxiety and depression (0-7), mild (8-10) or moderate to severe anxiety and depression (10-21)
Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Life Satisfaction Checklist
Time Frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction with the global item "Life as a whole" and ten domain specific items. Answering alternatives range from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)
Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susanne Guidetti, Professor, Karolinska Institutet

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation

3
Subscribe