Emulation of the EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Using Healthcare Claims Data

May 14, 2026 updated by: Shirley Vichy Wang, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale emulation of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the Randomized Controlled Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT-DUPLICATE) initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.

This study is part of a series that applies the Benchmark, Expand, and Calibration (BenchExCal) approach, in which an initial trial emulation is benchmarked against a completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) to inform a subsequent database study for related clinical questions or expanded indications. In this empirical example, the related clinical question has also been evaluated in a completed randomized trial, allowing comparison of the expanded database emulation with the corresponding RCT findings.

It is intended to emulate, as closely as is possible in healthcare insurance claims data the EMPEROR-Preserved trial described below. Although many features of the trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the trial. Randomization cannot be achieved in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice. Investigators assume that the RCT provides the reference standard treatment effect estimate and that failure to replicate RCT findings is indicative of the inadequacy of the healthcare claims data for emulation for a range of possible reasons and does not provide information on the validity of the original RCT finding.

The EMPEROR-Preserved trial is a superiority trial to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), vs placebo on cardiovascular death and hospitalisation for heart failure among individuals with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The database study is designed to emulate the EMPEROR-Preserved trial. It will be a new-user active-comparator cohort study, conducted using 3 national United States claims databases, where we compare the effect of empagliflozin vs sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), on all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure. While the EMPEROR-Preserved trial was conducted in participants with and without T2DM, both subgroups showed similar effect estimates in their results. Furthermore, while the trial compared empagliflozin to placebo, we chose to use sitagliptin as an active comparator proxy for placebo to minimize confounding by indication. Sitagliptin was specifically chosen because a major randomized controlled trial on cardiovascular outcomes demonstrated that it does not affect the cardiovascular outcomes under investigation. Furthermore, clinical guidelines during the study period recommended both SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors as second- or third-line options for glucose lowering, and the therapies are similarly costly, reducing concerns about channelling of patients based on socioeconomic status.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

39614

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02120
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals aged 18 years or older with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes

Description

Study period:

Optum: Eligible cohort entry period from August 1, 2014 to August 31, 2024. Marketscan: Eligible cohort entry period from August 1, 2014 to September 31, 2023.

Medicare: Eligible cohort entry period from August 1, 2014 to September 31, 2020.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
  • Structural heart disease
  • Previous HHF
  • BMI < 45 kg/m2
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Use of oral diuretics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent use of both study drugs on cohort entry date
  • MI, CABG or other major cardiovascular surgery, GI surgery or disorder, stroke or TIA [Day -91, Day 0]
  • Implantable cardiac defibrillator [Day -91, Day 0]
  • Hypotension [Day -91, Day 0]
  • Major surgery [Day -91, Day 0]
  • GI surgery or disorder [Day -91, Day 0]
  • Cancer [Day -730, Day 0]
  • Heart transplant [all available data, Day 0]
  • Pacemaker [all available data, Day 0]
  • Liver disease [all available data, Day 0]
  • Atrial fibrillation [Day -183, Day 0]
  • Hypertension [Day -183, Day 0]
  • Impaired renal function [Day -183, Day 0]
  • Anemia [Day -183, Day 0]
  • History of ketoacidosis [Day -183, Day 0]
  • Pregnancy [Day -183, Day 0]
  • Cardiomyopathy [Day -365, Day 0]
  • Valvular heart disease [Day -365, Day 0]
  • Chronic pulmonary disease [Day -365, Day 0]
  • Combined comorbidity score [Day -365, Day 0]
  • Chronic alcohol and or drug abuse [Day -365, Day 0]
  • Noncompliance [Day -365, Day 0]
  • Acute decompensated HF [Day -30, Day 0]
  • Use of SGLT2i or DPP4i [Day -183, Day 0]

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sitagliptin
Reference group
Initiation of sitagliptin described in electronic health records is used as the reference.
Empagliflozin
Exposure group
Initiation of empagliflozin described in electronic health records is used as the exposure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A composite of hospitalization for heart failure or all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between the arms, start of any other SGLT2i or DPP4i.
To evaluate the comparative effect of empagliflozin vs sitagliptin on hospitalisation for heart failure or all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between the arms, start of any other SGLT2i or DPP4i.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cataract surgery
Time Frame: 1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between the arms, start of any other SGLT2i or DPP4i.
To evaluate the comparative effect of empagliflozin vs sitagliptin on the control outcome cataract surgery.
1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between the arms, start of any other SGLT2i or DPP4i.
Lumbar radiculopathy
Time Frame: day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between the arms, start of any other SGLT2i or DPP4i.
To evaluate the comparative effect of empagliflozin vs sitagliptin on the control outcome lumbar radiculopathy (excluding patients with recent outcome prior to the follow-up time window (30 days)).
day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between the arms, start of any other SGLT2i or DPP4i.
Hernia
Time Frame: 1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between the arms, start of any other SGLT2i or DPP4i.
To evaluate the comparative effect of empagliflozin vs sitagliptin on the control outcome hernia (excluding patients with recent outcome prior to the follow-up time window (30 days)).
1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between the arms, start of any other SGLT2i or DPP4i.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shirley Wang, PhD, ScM, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Empagliflozin

Subscribe