Sepsis Multiomic Analysis & Risk sTratification in China (China SMART-1)

July 7, 2026 updated by: Pingsen Zhao, Yuebei People's Hospital

Sepsis Multiomic Analysis & Risk sTratification in China (China SMART-1): A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, and delayed diagnosis remains a major driver of mortality, while traditional biomarkers (PCT, CRP, lactate) have limited early sensitivity and timeliness. This prospective, single-center, observational cohort study at Yuebei People's Hospital will enroll approximately 1400 ICU patients (1000 with sepsis and 400 non-sepsis controls) to build a comprehensive multi-omics biobank and identify early diagnostic and risk-stratification biomarkers for sepsis. Using bulk RNA sequencing, targeted proteomics (PRM), targeted metabolomics, and ELISA validation, the study aims to: (1) screen mRNA diagnostic biomarkers and establish a molecular risk-stratification system; (2) develop and validate an RT-LAMP rapid bedside detection method; and (3) identify and validate plasma and urine protein/metabolite biomarkers and build a combined diagnostic model. The specific candidate biomarker identities are maintained confidentially and will be disclosed with the primary results.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection and is listed by the World Health Organization as one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD 2017), there are approximately 48.9 million cases of sepsis globally each year, resulting in about 11 million deaths, with a case fatality rate as high as 20%-40%. In China, the incidence of sepsis is approximately 240 cases per 100,000 population, and the sepsis-related mortality rate in ICU patients reaches 35.5%, significantly higher than that in developed countries. Although international guidelines (such as the Surviving Sepsis Campaign) emphasize the "golden 6 hours" early intervention concept, clinical practice still faces two core problems: delayed diagnosis and insufficient biomarker efficacy. The current diagnostic criteria (Sepsis-3) rely on the SOFA score and evidence of infection, but the SOFA score depends on laboratory indicators (such as platelets and bilirubin), which are difficult to obtain quickly in emergency settings. Commonly used clinical biomarkers such as procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have significant limitations: although PCT has certain specificity for bacterial infections, its sensitivity is low (approximately 60%-70%) in local infections (such as abscesses) or infections caused by atypical pathogens (such as viruses and fungi); as an acute-phase reactant, CRP elevation lags behind the inflammatory response (6-12 hours after infection) and is interfered with by non-infectious factors such as surgery and trauma; lactate reflects tissue hypoperfusion, but its elevation mostly indicates that the patient has entered the stage of septic shock, missing the window for early intervention.

Studies have shown that each 1-hour delay in the diagnosis of sepsis increases patient mortality by 7.6%. Therefore, the development of highly sensitive and specific early diagnostic tools is a key breakthrough to improve prognosis.

Although microbial culture is the gold standard for sepsis diagnosis, it takes too long and may delay the diagnosis of sepsis. In addition, microbial culture tests may be negative in approximately 30-50% of sepsis patients. Current research indicates that in the intensive care process of sepsis patients, clinical electronic medical record data are increasingly being used to construct multivariate clinical early warning models. Mining these data may accelerate clinical monitoring of sepsis and provide new ideas for the early identification of post-traumatic sepsis.

Peripheral blood mRNA expression levels can directly reflect the host's gene regulatory response to infection and theoretically show detectable systemic changes within hours after infection, having higher early diagnostic potential than protein biomarkers. With the maturity of RNA sequencing technology and the significant reduction in costs, biomarker screening based on whole transcriptome data has become an important strategy for discovering novel sepsis diagnostic biomarkers. However, existing transcriptome studies are mostly based on small-scale cohorts with limited sample sizes and mainly focus on European and American populations, lacking large-sample prospective studies that systematically screen and validate mRNA diagnostic biomarkers in Chinese ICU populations. In addition to diagnostic dilemmas, sepsis patients show significant differences in response to standardized treatment regimens, suggesting the existence of internal molecular subtypes with different biological characteristics. Transcriptomic studies have confirmed the molecular basis of this heterogeneity: Scicluna et al. identified four genomic intrinsic subtypes (MARS classification) in a European multicenter cohort, with significant differences in immune characteristics and 28-day mortality among subtypes; Seymour et al. described two robust clinical phenotypes (α-type and β-type), with β-type characterized by immunosuppression and multiple organ injury. These studies have laid the theoretical foundation for the precise stratification of sepsis, but their samples are all from European and American populations, and there are systematic differences in genetic background, pathogen spectrum, and medical practice compared with Chinese patients, limiting the direct extrapolation applicability of the classification results. Currently, there are no large-sample transcriptome-based stratification studies of sepsis in Chinese ICU populations. Therefore, we propose Substudy 1: Screening of early diagnostic molecular biomarkers and molecular stratification biomarkers for sepsis based on Bulk RNA-seq transcriptome sequencing.

Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) has the characteristics of high sensitivity, high specificity, and fast detection speed, and has been widely used in clinical testing. In our previous work, we developed relevant detection methods. Therefore, we propose Substudy 2: Validate the diagnostic efficacy of RT-LAMP as an early rapid bedside diagnostic tool for ICU sepsis.

In addition, we previously used data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics and untargeted metabolomics.to screen a panel of plasma biomarkers with diagnostic potential for sepsis; the specific candidate identities are maintained confidentially and will be disclosed with the primary results. Some candidate biomarkers have been validated in our prior cohort studies. Urine has the same diagnostic value. Therefore, we propose Substudy 3: Validate the diagnostic efficacy of plasma protein/metabolic biomarkers as early diagnostic biomarkers for ICU sepsis. Substudy 4: Validate the diagnostic efficacy of urine protein/metabolic biomarkers as early diagnostic biomarkers for ICU sepsis.

This study intends to rely on the ICU of Yuebei People's Hospital to prospectively enroll 1400 subjects (1000 sepsis cases, 400 non-sepsis controls) and establish the largest comprehensive biobank for sepsis research in Chinese ICUs to date. Bulk RNA-seq, RT-LAMP, parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) proteomics, metabolomics, and ELISA-based immunological detection techniques will be used to detect and analyze whole blood, plasma, or urine samples from enrolled patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Shaoguan, Guangdong, China, 512026
        • Recruiting
        • Yuebei People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Critically ill adult patients admitted to the ICU of Yuebei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China. The study population includes patients with confirmed sepsis (Sepsis-3 criteria) and non-sepsis controls admitted during the same period. All participants had blood samples (plasma and whole blood RNA) and urine samples collected within 24 hours of ICU admission and stored at -80°C.

Description

Inclusion Criteria - Sepsis Group:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Meets the Sepsis-3 diagnostic criteria: confirmed or suspected infection with an increase in SOFA score of ≥ 2 points from baseline
  • Develops sepsis within 72 hours of ICU admission
  • Voluntarily signs the informed consent form (or signed by the legal representative)

Inclusion Criteria - Non-Sepsis Group:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Hospitalized in the ICU during the same period, with no clear evidence of infection and not meeting the diagnostic criteria for sepsis
  • Expected ICU treatment time ≥ 24 hours
  • Voluntarily signs the informed consent form (or signed by the legal representative)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage chronic organ failure (end-stage renal disease, decompensated liver cirrhosis [Child-Pugh Grade C], or chronic heart failure NYHA Class IV), or malignant tumor
  • Immunocompromised, autoimmune disease, or long-term use of glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants within the past 3 months
  • Pregnant or postpartum patients
  • Other conditions deemed unsuitable by the investigator (e.g., terminal state, refusal to cooperate with sample collection, or inability to cooperate with in-hospital and out-of-hospital follow-up)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Sepsis group
Adult ICU patients (≥18 years) meeting Sepsis-3 criteria (confirmed or suspected infection with an acute rise in SOFA ≥ 2), with sepsis onset within 72 hours of ICU admission.
Non-sepsis control group
Adult ICU patients (≥18 years) admitted during the same period with no clear evidence of infection, not meeting sepsis criteria, and an expected ICU stay ≥ 24 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of the mRNA biomarker panel for early sepsis
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
Whole-blood Bulk RNA-seq expression profiling of the sepsis versus non-sepsis groups. Core diagnostic mRNA biomarkers are selected by multi-algorithm cross-validation (WGCNA + LASSO + SVM-RFE). Diagnostic efficacy for early ICU sepsis is assessed against the Sepsis-3 reference classification and reported as AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV.
Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
Number of sepsis molecular subtypes identified by unsupervised consensus clustering
Time Frame: Baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission)

Unsupervised consensus clustering is applied to the sepsis-group whole-blood mRNA expression profiles; the optimal number of subtypes is determined by standard criteria (consensus CDF and delta-area). The reported value is the number of molecular subtypes identified.

Unit of Measure: subtypes (count)

Baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission)
Diagnostic accuracy (AUC) of the RT-LAMP assay for early sepsis
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)

The RT-LAMP assay targeting core sepsis mRNA markers is applied to whole-blood samples. Diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing sepsis from non-sepsis (against the Sepsis-3 reference classification) is summarized by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV at the optimal cut-off are reported as supporting measures in the Description.

Unit of Measure: AUC (0-1)

Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
Diagnostic accuracy (AUC) of the combined protein/metabolic biomarker model for sepsis
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)

Plasma/urine protein biomarkers (measured by PRM/ELISA) and metabolic biomarkers are combined by multivariable logistic regression into a multi-marker diagnostic model. Diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing sepsis from non-sepsis (against the Sepsis-3 reference classification) is summarized by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV at the optimal cut-off are reported as supporting measures in the Description.

Unit of Measure: AUC (0-1)

Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 28 days from baseline

ll-cause mortality within 28 days after enrollment, confirmed via the medical record system and telephone follow-up.

Unit of Measure: participants (percentage)

28 days from baseline
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, up to 28 days

Duration of the ICU stay for enrolled patients, from ICU admission to ICU discharge.

Unit of Measure: days

From ICU admission through ICU discharge, up to 28 days
Incidence of new-onset organ dysfunction
Time Frame: Through 28 days from baseline

Proportion of patients developing new-onset organ dysfunction during the observation period, defined by an increase in the SOFA score in an organ system not already dysfunctional at baseline.

Unit of Measure: participants (percentage)

Through 28 days from baseline
Correlation of core biomarker expression with 28-day mortality and SOFA score
Time Frame: 28 days from baseline
Correlation between the mRNA and protein expression levels of core biomarkers and (a) 28-day all-cause mortality and (b) the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. The SOFA score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe organ dysfunction (a worse outcome).
28 days from baseline
Comparative diagnostic performance versus PCT and CRP
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
Comparison of diagnostic efficacy (AUC, compared by DeLong's test) between the novel biomarkers/combined diagnostic model and the traditional indicators PCT and CRP.
Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
Subgroup analysis of biomarker diagnostic performance
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
Diagnostic efficacy (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) of biomarkers across pre-specified subgroups (infection site, pathogen type, organ injury).
Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
Immune-inflammatory pathway characteristics across molecular strata
Time Frame: Baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission)
Analysis of immune-inflammatory pathway features (e.g., by GSEA) that differentiate the sepsis molecular strata.
Baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe