- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07599644
Sepsis Multiomic Analysis & Risk sTratification in China (China SMART-1)
Sepsis Multiomic Analysis & Risk sTratification in China (China SMART-1): A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Objectives:
- Perform Bulk RNA-seq transcriptome sequencing on enrolled samples to screen sepsis-specific mRNA diagnostic biomarkers and evaluate their diagnostic efficacy for early sepsis in the ICU; establish a molecular risk stratification system for sepsis based on mRNA expression profiles, and clarify the immunobiological characteristics, clinical manifestation differences, and prognostic risk levels of each stratification.
- Integrate core indicators screened from transcriptome sequencing, open-source databases, and previous studies to establish and optimize an RT-LAMP rapid detection method for core sepsis targets, validate its diagnostic accuracy, specificity, and reproducibility, and construct a rapid sepsis diagnostic model adapted to bedside scenarios.
- Integrate core indicators screened from open-source databases and previous studies to screen sepsis-specific diagnostic biomarkers in plasma and urine via PRM and metabolomics, complete protein/metabolic level validation using immunological methods (ELISA), construct a combined diagnostic model for sepsis, and complete internal validation and efficacy evaluation.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Descripción detallada
Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection and is listed by the World Health Organization as one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD 2017), there are approximately 48.9 million cases of sepsis globally each year, resulting in about 11 million deaths, with a case fatality rate as high as 20%-40%. In China, the incidence of sepsis is approximately 240 cases per 100,000 population, and the sepsis-related mortality rate in ICU patients reaches 35.5%, significantly higher than that in developed countries. Although international guidelines (such as the Surviving Sepsis Campaign) emphasize the "golden 6 hours" early intervention concept, clinical practice still faces two core problems: delayed diagnosis and insufficient biomarker efficacy. The current diagnostic criteria (Sepsis-3) rely on the SOFA score and evidence of infection, but the SOFA score depends on laboratory indicators (such as platelets and bilirubin), which are difficult to obtain quickly in emergency settings. Commonly used clinical biomarkers such as procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have significant limitations: although PCT has certain specificity for bacterial infections, its sensitivity is low (approximately 60%-70%) in local infections (such as abscesses) or infections caused by atypical pathogens (such as viruses and fungi); as an acute-phase reactant, CRP elevation lags behind the inflammatory response (6-12 hours after infection) and is interfered with by non-infectious factors such as surgery and trauma; lactate reflects tissue hypoperfusion, but its elevation mostly indicates that the patient has entered the stage of septic shock, missing the window for early intervention.
Studies have shown that each 1-hour delay in the diagnosis of sepsis increases patient mortality by 7.6%. Therefore, the development of highly sensitive and specific early diagnostic tools is a key breakthrough to improve prognosis.
Although microbial culture is the gold standard for sepsis diagnosis, it takes too long and may delay the diagnosis of sepsis. In addition, microbial culture tests may be negative in approximately 30-50% of sepsis patients. Current research indicates that in the intensive care process of sepsis patients, clinical electronic medical record data are increasingly being used to construct multivariate clinical early warning models. Mining these data may accelerate clinical monitoring of sepsis and provide new ideas for the early identification of post-traumatic sepsis.
Peripheral blood mRNA expression levels can directly reflect the host's gene regulatory response to infection and theoretically show detectable systemic changes within hours after infection, having higher early diagnostic potential than protein biomarkers. With the maturity of RNA sequencing technology and the significant reduction in costs, biomarker screening based on whole transcriptome data has become an important strategy for discovering novel sepsis diagnostic biomarkers. However, existing transcriptome studies are mostly based on small-scale cohorts with limited sample sizes and mainly focus on European and American populations, lacking large-sample prospective studies that systematically screen and validate mRNA diagnostic biomarkers in Chinese ICU populations. In addition to diagnostic dilemmas, sepsis patients show significant differences in response to standardized treatment regimens, suggesting the existence of internal molecular subtypes with different biological characteristics. Transcriptomic studies have confirmed the molecular basis of this heterogeneity: Scicluna et al. identified four genomic intrinsic subtypes (MARS classification) in a European multicenter cohort, with significant differences in immune characteristics and 28-day mortality among subtypes; Seymour et al. described two robust clinical phenotypes (α-type and β-type), with β-type characterized by immunosuppression and multiple organ injury. These studies have laid the theoretical foundation for the precise stratification of sepsis, but their samples are all from European and American populations, and there are systematic differences in genetic background, pathogen spectrum, and medical practice compared with Chinese patients, limiting the direct extrapolation applicability of the classification results. Currently, there are no large-sample transcriptome-based stratification studies of sepsis in Chinese ICU populations. Therefore, we propose Substudy 1: Screening of early diagnostic molecular biomarkers and molecular stratification biomarkers for sepsis based on Bulk RNA-seq transcriptome sequencing.
Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) has the characteristics of high sensitivity, high specificity, and fast detection speed, and has been widely used in clinical testing. In our previous work, we developed relevant detection methods. Therefore, we propose Substudy 2: Validate the diagnostic efficacy of RT-LAMP as an early rapid bedside diagnostic tool for ICU sepsis.
In addition, we previously used data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics and untargeted metabolomics to screen biomarkers with diagnostic potential for sepsis from plasma, such as AHSG, CLU, SERPINA4, etc. (see Appendix 3 for details). Some biomarkers have been validated in cohort studies. Urine has the same diagnostic value. Therefore, we propose Substudy 3: Validate the diagnostic efficacy of plasma protein/metabolic biomarkers as early diagnostic biomarkers for ICU sepsis. Substudy 4: Validate the diagnostic efficacy of urine protein/metabolic biomarkers as early diagnostic biomarkers for ICU sepsis.
This study intends to rely on the ICU of Yuebei People's Hospital to prospectively enroll 1400 subjects (1000 sepsis cases, 400 non-sepsis controls) and establish the largest comprehensive biobank for sepsis research in Chinese ICUs to date. Bulk RNA-seq, RT-LAMP, parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) proteomics, metabolomics, and ELISA-based immunological detection techniques will be used to detect and analyze whole blood, plasma, or urine samples from enrolled patients.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Pingsen Zhao Principal Investigator, Dr.
- Número de teléfono: 8613332876639
- Correo electrónico: zhaopingsen01@163.com
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Guangdong
-
Shaoguan, Guangdong, Porcelana, 512026
- Reclutamiento
- Yuebei People's Hospital
-
Contacto:
- Pingsen Zhao Principal Investigator, Dr.
- Número de teléfono: 8613332876639
- Correo electrónico: zhaopingsen01@163.com
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
- Inclusion Criteria for Sepsis Group Age > 18 years; Meet the Sepsis-3 diagnostic criteria for sepsis: confirmed or suspected infection with an increase in SOFA score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) of ≥ 2 points from baseline; Develop sepsis within 72 hours of ICU admission; Voluntarily sign the informed consent form (or signed by the legal representative).
- Inclusion Criteria for Non-Sepsis Group Age > 18 years; Hospitalized in the ICU of our hospital during the same period, with no clear evidence of infection and not meeting the diagnostic criteria for sepsis; Expected ICU treatment time ≥ 24 hours; Voluntarily sign the informed consent form (or signed by the legal representative).
- Exclusion Criteria Complicated with end-stage chronic organ failure (end-stage renal disease, decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh Grade C), chronic heart failure NYHA Class IV), or malignant tumor; Immunocompromised or suffering from autoimmune diseases, or long-term use of glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants within the past 3 months; Pregnant and postpartum patients; Patients with incomplete data collection; Other conditions deemed unsuitable for participation in the study by the investigator (such as terminal state, refusal to cooperate with sample collection, or inability to cooperate with in-hospital and out-of-hospital follow-up).
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
|---|
|
Sepsis group
Age > 18 years; Meet the Sepsis-3 diagnostic criteria for sepsis: confirmed or suspected infection with an increase in SOFA score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) of ≥ 2 points from baseline; Develop sepsis within 72 hours of ICU admission; Voluntarily sign the informed consent form (or signed by the legal representative).
|
|
Non-sepsis control group
Age > 18 years; Hospitalized in the ICU of our hospital during the same period, with no clear evidence of infection and not meeting the diagnostic criteria for sepsis; Expected ICU treatment time ≥ 24 hours; Voluntarily sign the informed consent form (or signed by the legal representative).
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Whole-genome mRNA expression profiles of the sepsis group and the non-sepsis group, the list of core diagnostic biomarkers screened by multi-algorithm cross-validation (WGCNA + LASSO + SVM-RFE), and their diagnostic efficacy for early sepsis in the ICU.
Periodo de tiempo: Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
|
Within 24 hours of ICU admission (baseline)
|
|
Results of sepsis molecular risk stratification, and differences in clinical characteristics, biological characteristics, and prognosis among different stratifications
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission)
|
At baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission)
|
|
Methodological performance evaluation of the RT-LAMP rapid diagnostic method and its early diagnostic efficacy for sepsis, reporting AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values.
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission)
|
At baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission)
|
|
Early diagnostic efficacy of protein/metabolic biomarkers in plasma/urine for sepsis, and AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values of the combined diagnostic model.
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission
|
At baseline (within 24 hours of ICU admission
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
28-day all-cause mortality, ICU length of stay, and incidence of new organ dysfunction in patients.
Periodo de tiempo: 28 days from baseline
|
28 days from baseline
|
|
Correlation between mRNA expression levels and protein expression levels of core biomarkers and 28-day all-cause mortality and SOFA score in patients
Periodo de tiempo: 28 days from baseline
|
28 days from baseline
|
|
Comparison results of diagnostic efficacy between novel biomarkers/combined diagnostic models and traditional indicators PCT and CRP.
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline
|
At baseline
|
|
Subgroup analysis of biomarkers (infection site, pathogen type, organ injury)
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline
|
At baseline
|
|
Analysis of immune inflammatory pathway characteristics of different molecular stratifications of sepsis.
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline
|
At baseline
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- China SMART-1
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .
Ensayos clínicos sobre Septicemia
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI)ReclutamientoSepticemia | Sepsis, Severa | Sepsis y Choque Séptico | Sepsis en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos | Sepsis, Choque Séptico | Sepsis, Sepsis Severa y Shock Séptico | Sepsis con disfunción orgánica múltiple (MOD) | Sepsis con disfunción orgánica agudaEstados Unidos
-
Assiut UniversityAún no reclutandoDisfunción miocárdica inducida por sepsis | Miocardiopatía inducida por sepsisEgipto
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasReclutamientoSepticemia | Shock séptico | Síndrome de sepsis | Sepsis, Severa | Sepsis bacteriana | Sepsis BacteriemiaEstados Unidos
-
Jip GroenInBiomeReclutamientoColonización Microbiana | Infeccion Neonatal | Sepsis Neonatal, Inicio Temprano | Enfermedad microbiana | Sepsis clínica | Sepsis neonatal con cultivo negativo | Sepsis Neonatal, Inicio Tardío | Sepsis neonatal con cultivo positivoPaíses Bajos
-
Carol Davila University of Medicine and PharmacyReclutamiento
-
Assiut UniversityAún no reclutandoSepsis en Pacientes de UrgenciasEgipto
-
Indonesia UniversityTerminadoImpacto del tratamiento con heparina no fraccionada en dosis bajas sobre la inflamación en la sepsisSepsis severa con shock séptico | Sepsis severa sin shock sépticoIndonesia
-
Firat UniversityTerminadoSepsis - para Reducir la Mortalidad en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos | Biomarcador de Sepsis | Regulación Molecular a la Baja de Fenixina-14Turquía (Türkiye)
-
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute...Reclutamiento