Brief Single-Session Body Neutrality Program for LGBTQ+ Adults in Central Alabama

May 27, 2026 updated by: Tiffany Brown, Auburn University
LGBTQ+ individuals tend to have elevated risks for eating disorders (ED), possibly due to minority stress. For LGBTQ+ individuals living in rural Alabama, they tend to experience high levels of anti-LGBTQ+ structural stigma and limited access to LGBTQ+-specific resources, which engender compounded risk for ED development and reduced access to care. Brief digital single-session intervention that incorporates psychoeducation about minority stress and body neutrality may be efficacious in reducing ED risk and improve positive body image among LGBTQ+ adults in rural areas. Prior research from another lab developed a single-session intervention (Project Body Neutrality) among LGBTQ+ adolescents indicated immediate positive changes in body image constructs and psychological well-being. The present project evaluates and adapts Project Body Neutrality, specifically for LGBTQ+ adults in a rural high-stigma, low-resource region.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Eating disorders (EDs) kill one person in the United States every 52 minutes, cost over $65 billion annually ($966 million annually in Alabama (AL) alone), have numerous barriers to treatment access, and are notoriously difficult to treat. Thus, scalable interventions that can target high-risk groups prior to ED onset are critical to reducing both the public health burden and number of people suffering from EDs. Researchers have found that LGBTQ+ adults are at a significantly increased risk for EDs. Further, LGBTQ+ adults who live in rural areas with high levels of anti-LGBTQ+ structural stigma and limited access to LGBTQ+-specific resources may have compounded risk for ED development and reduced access to care. Despite this glaring inequity, few scalable programs exist to prevent EDs in LGBTQ+ populations. Thus, the present study proposes a pilot digital single-session intervention to reduce ED risk for LGBTQ+ adults in a high-stigma, low-resource region of AL.

LGBTQ+ people represent a high-risk group for EDs due to minority stressors. LGBTQ+ individuals have a 2-3 fold increased risk for developing an ED compared to their cisgender heterosexual peers. LGBTQ+ young adults also exhibit higher rates of overall ED symptoms, binge eating, dieting, vomiting, laxative, or diet pill use, muscle-building supplement use, and fasting compared to their non-LGBTQ+ peers. Researchers, using minority stress theory, have identified that increased risk is due, in part, to chronic stressors (e.g., prejudice, victimization, discrimination, internalized homophobia and/or transphobia, sexual identity concealment) due to being part of a marginalized group. These stressors are exacerbated for LGBTQ+ people of Color and those living in poverty. Additionally, LGBTQ+ individuals living in rural areas have increased vulnerability for mental health concerns and EDs. LGBTQ+ adults living in rural areas that have high prevalence of anti-LGBTQ+ structural stigma (e.g., discriminatory laws, policies, and community attitudes that promote unequal treatment) and low access to LGBTQ+-specific coping resources (e.g., LGBTQ+ centers, specialized healthcare) have increased risk for mental health problems compared to their urban peers. Further, individuals living in rural areas of AL, especially rural people of Color, often experience high degrees of medical mistrust due to lack of culturally competent care and history of medical abuse, which further increases disparities in broader health care access and utilization. Given the commonality of EDs in rural areas, high LGBTQ-stigma, and limited resources, LGBTQ+ adults living in rural regions of AL may represent a particularly vulnerable and underserved group for EDs.

Despite consistent research supporting increased ED risk among LGBTQ+ individuals, no ED prevention efforts have targeted minority stressors in rural LGBTQ+ adults, who need these interventions the most. Brief digital single-session intervention that incorporates psychoeducation about minority stress and body neutrality may be efficacious in reducing ED risk and improve positive body image among LGBTQ+ adults in rural areas. A recent randomized controlled trial developed a similar single-session intervention among LGBTQ+ adolescents (13-17 years old) in the United States. This Project Body Neutrality study indicated immediate positive changes in participants' body satisfaction, functionality appreciation, hopelessness, and perceived agency. This study supports the potential of online single-session intervention in addressing LGBTQ+ populations' eating pathology and body image concerns. Importantly, research suggests that the use of community-engaged research methodologies, where members of the community are actively engaged in research study design, development, and implementation, are critical for addressing the needs of minoritized communities and mitigating medical mistrust. Indeed, community-engaged research is a common approach to help reduce health disparities in diverse LGBTQ+ populations and our team has successfully adapted multi-session body image interventions for LGBTQ+ populations (e.g., the PRIDE Body Project) using a community-engaged approach in both rural and urban settings.

The present project evaluates and adapts Project Body Neutrality for LGBTQ+ adults in a rural high-stigma, low-resource region. The proposed study will recruit N = 40 LGBTQ+ adults in central AL to complete our program and pre-intervention and post-intervention assessments. The investigators hypothesize that this intervention program will effectively address LGBTQ+ adults' eating pathology, as well as their experience of minority stress, and improve their positive body image, especially their functionality appreciation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Auburn, Alabama, United States, 36830
        • Auburn University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tiffany A Brown, Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years old,
  • Identify as LGBTQ+,
  • Currently living in one of the following AL counties: Lee, Dallas, Lowndes, Autauga, Coosa, Elmore, Tallapoosa, Macon, or Russell
  • Have internet access (either via computer/tablet, mobile phone, or community center [e.g., library])

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being less than 18 years old,
  • Identifying as cisgender and heterosexual,
  • Not living in central AL,
  • Not having internet access.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single session body neutrality program
Single session body neutrality program is a brief, 30-minute digital intervention program. Participants will at first be given a brief introduction to body neutrality and minority stress. Then, they will be given fictional vignettes of based on common regional examples of body image stressors for LGBTQ+ individuals and practice giving advice to them. Finally, participants are provided with their customized body neutrality action plan based on their responses during the intervention program.
Single session body neutrality program is a brief, 30-minute digital intervention program. Participants will at first be given a brief introduction to body neutrality and minority stress. Then, they will be given fictional vignettes of based on common regional examples of body image stressors for LGBTQ+ individuals and practice giving advice to them. Finally, participants are provided with their customized body neutrality action plan based on their responses during the intervention program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functionality Appreciation Scale
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Assesses changes in functionality appreciation (7 items, 7-point scale), with higher scores indicating higher levels of functionality appreciation.
baseline and immediately after the intervention
Body Image State Scale
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Assesses changes in one's evaluative/affective body image states (6 items, 9-point scale), with higher scores indicating more favorable body image states.
baseline and immediately after the intervention
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Negative Affect
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Assesses changes in one's negative affect (20 items, 5-point scale), with higher scores indicating higher levels of negative affect.
baseline and immediately after the intervention
Internalized stigma among LGBTQ+ people scale
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Assesses changes in one's internalized LGBTQ+ stigma (5 items, 5-point scale), with higher scores indicating higher levels of internalized LGBTQ+ stigma.
baseline and immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objectified Body Consciousness Scale- Surveillance scale
Time Frame: baseline
Assesses the extent to which one monitors one's physical appearance (8 items, 7-point scale), with higher scores indicating higher levels of body monitoring.
baseline
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-10 item, 3 factor
Time Frame: baseline
Assesses the extent to which one endorses Dietary Restraint, Preoccupation and Eating Concern, and Shape/Weight Overvaluation (10 items, 7-point scale), with higher scores indicating higher levels of body monitoring.
baseline
Everyday Discrimination Scale
Time Frame: baseline
Assesses the frequency one experience day-to-day discrimination (9 items, 6-point scale), with higher scores indicating higher frequency of everyday discrimination.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 2, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 2, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2222

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Body Image

Clinical Trials on Single session body neutrality program

Subscribe