- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07625150
FDG PET/MRI Imaging of Patellofemoral Joint Osteoarthritis (FDG-PFJOA)
Understanding Painful Inflammation in Patellofemoral Joint OA Using [18F] FDG
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Background:
Imaging of pain from patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA): PFJ OA is primarily defined as the degeneration of the cartilage of the PFJ; however, the cartilage itself is not innervated and thus cannot be a source of pain. The knee joint is composed of a variety of other innervated tissues, including the synovium, subchondral bone, meniscus, ligaments, tendons, muscles, and infrapatellar fat pad. The degeneration of the patella cartilage may result from or even result in some form of damage to these innervated joint tissues, which eventually leads to the sensation of pain. The main challenge in imaging identification of pain generators in PFJ OA is that structural abnormalities that can cause pain also frequently occur in the asymptomatic population as a natural wear-and-tear process with aging. For example, meniscal tears on MRI are nearly equally prevalent (~60%) in symptomatic and asymptomatic knees. The proposed approach here is to adopt [18F]FDG PET/MRI, a molecular imaging technique highly sensitive to hypermetabolic inflammation. Pain in PFJ OA may stem from inflammatory responses to tissue damage, leading to the increased activities of immune cells causing the local surge of need for energy. [18F]FDG PET is the most widely accepted imaging modality for identifying pathology by visualizing hotspots of energy demand and has recently shown strong promise in detecting painful hypermetabolic inflammation in multiple musculoskeletal pain conditions. Therefore, the proposed implementation of [18F]FDG PET/MRI for PFJ OA will facilitate pinpointing hypermetabolic pain generators that conventional structural imaging techniques have failed to identify.
Loading of PFJ OA: The magnitude and distribution of loads across a joint have the potential to accelerate structural OA decline and result in pain. While biomechanical factors are known to influence the progression of TFJ OA, little is known about the role of biomechanical factors in PFJOA disease progression. These factors are likely to differ from those for TFJ OA progression as a result of the unique functions and design of the different joints. The investigative team has extensive experience in the field of biomechanics and OA. Elevated PFJ stress during squatting was demonstrated in people with patellofemoral pain, a condition affecting younger adults with similar features to PFJ OA. Preliminary work by the investigators confirmed higher PFJ stress during walking in individuals with PFJ OA compared to controls. These data suggest that elevated PFJ stress is likely a contributory factor in PFJ OA. Increased knee extensor moments can result in higher PFJ reaction forces and PFJ stress at a given knee angle and thus may be a potential risk factor for PFJ OA progression. Preliminary work by the investigators showed that higher knee extensor moment during late stance was predictive of structural progression of PFJ OA at one-year follow-up. The current supplement will support further investigation in single-leg squat biomechanics in persons with painful PFJ OA and asymptomatic matched controls. These data are necessary to understand the impact of loading and squat kinematics on pain, leading to novel movement-based interventions for pain management.
AIMS:
Aim 1: Identification of painful inflammation in the unloaded knee with PFJ OA The investigators will 1) compare [18F]FDG uptake measurements of the unloaded knee between symptomatic PFJ OA knees and asymptomatic knees and 2) analyze the correlation between [18F]FDG and biomechanical measurements. The investigators will recruit 25 PFJ OA patients with pain reproducible with a weight-bearing exercise (single-leg squats) and 25 age/sex/BMI-matched asymptomatic controls. The [18F]FDG PET/MRI session of the unloaded knee will yield the max measurements of [18F]FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) in the local hotspots. All subjects will have a post-imaging functional assessment through a battery of physical performance tests for biomechanical measurements. The investigators will compare the [18F]FDG uptake measurements between patients and controls using the t-test and conduct a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis to determine the biomechanical measurements predicting the [18F]FDG uptake measurements.
Aim 2: Identification of painful inflammation in the loaded knee with PFJ OA The investigators will identify abnormal [18F]FDG hotspots in the PFJ of the patients due to knee loading by comparison with asymptomatic controls. After the [18F]FDG PET/MRI session in Aim 1, the participant will be re-scanned using the same PET/MRI protocol while loading the knee continuously with 25% bodyweight using a custom-made device. The investigators will measure the difference of the [18F]FDG SUVmax between the unloaded and loaded sessions in the synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscle around the PFJ. [18F]FDG uptake difference will be compared between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls using the t-test and GLM analysis to determine biomechanical measurements prediction of [18F]FDG uptake difference.
The successful execution of the proposed aims will offer a novel, non-invasive imaging method to identify the painful inflammation in PFJ OA as well as increased inflammatory response due to joint loading, which will eventually aggravate the pain. Together with the ongoing development in the parent R01 project to visualize bone remodeling and cartilage compositional changes, this project will facilitate building a comprehensive imaging method to examine the underlying degenerative process and the symptomatic manifestation of PFJ OA.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Eric Hammond
- Phone Number: 415-502-6470
- Email: eric.hammond@ucsf.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94107
- Recruiting
- UCSF Radiology China Basin
-
Contact:
- Eric Hammond
- Phone Number: 415-502-6470
- Email: eric.hammond@ucsf.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult with the capacity to give informed consent
- Ability to perform 25 single-leg squats
- No traumatic knee injuries/surgeries since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- No investigational drugs since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- No contraindications to MRI or PET tracer since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- Not taking steroid injections
- Not pregnant
- Additional inclusion criteria for healthy volunteers: Minimal pain (VAS=0-1) during a series of 25 single-leg squats on one or both legs
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to consent for themselves
- Inability to perform 25 single-leg squats with the study leg
- New traumatic knee injuries/surgeries since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- Taking investigational drugs since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- New contraindications to MRI or PET tracer since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- Taking steroid injections
- Pregnant
- Diabetic
- Additional exclusion criteria for healthy volunteers: VAS of 2 or greater during a series of 25 single-leg squats on both legs
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
PFJ OA Patients
Group defined as WORMS 2-6, and >1 VAS pain during 25 single-leg squats
|
|
Healthy Controls
Healthy volunteers with WORMS 0-1, and 0-1 VAS pain during 25 single-leg squats
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of [18F]FDG in PFJ Tissues, Pre-Loading
Time Frame: baseline, pre-loading
|
Comparison of FDG SUVmax between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls across various tissue types (synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscles) to identify hypermetabolic inflammation at pre-loading.
|
baseline, pre-loading
|
|
Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of [18F]FDG in PFJ Tissues, Post-Loading
Time Frame: baseline, post-loading
|
Comparison of FDG SUVmax between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls across various tissue types (synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscles) to identify hypermetabolic inflammation at post-loading.
|
baseline, post-loading
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in SUVmax Between Unloaded and Loaded States
Time Frame: baseline
|
The difference in FDG SUVmax measurements between the loaded PFJ and the unloaded PFJ imaging sessions to determine sensitivity to loading-induced inflammation.
|
baseline
|
|
Visual Analog Scale Maximum Pain Score During a Single-Leg Squat
Time Frame: baseline
|
Assessment of maximum pain levels during a single-leg squat.
Pain will be evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale, where scores range from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating "no pain" and 10 indicating "worst possible pain".
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Individual scores will be analyzed in relation to FDG uptake and loaded-unloaded uptake differences.
|
baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Richard Souza, PhD, PT, University of California, San Francisco
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- K24AR072133 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- 24-41266 (Other Identifier: UCSF IRB)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Edin MešanovićCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis of the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis of the Knees | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis Knee | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee JointBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Golden Jubilee National HospitalJohnson & Johnson; DePuy OrthopaedicsNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (OA) | Osteo Arthritis | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis (Knee) | Osteo Arthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom
-
Dr. David WassersteinSunnybrook Research InstituteRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)Canada
-
LifeBridge HealthMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.; Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain Chronic | Arthropathy of Knee Joint | Knee Disease | Osteoarthritis Knees Both | Osteoarthritis Knee Left | Osteoarthritis Knee RightUnited States
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
Emory UniversityVertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee ArthritisUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)United States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruiting