Pilot and Feasibility Study of Intra-articular Anti-CD14 for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

March 13, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability among Veterans, which contributes significantly to reduced mobility, impaired quality of life, and increased health care utilization. First-line therapies, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, and intra-articular corticosteroids, provide modest and short-term relief, while being associated with other side effects (i.e., potential for hastened cartilage loss) and no disease-modifying potential. Total knee arthroplasty, although effective, is not suitable for all patients and carries surgical risks. There is an unmet need for effective, durable, and locally-targeted therapies that can alleviate pain and improve function. The development of new therapies for this condition is thus a priority for the VA.

While the therapy has been used in humans in other contexts, to date there are no data on the safety, feasibility, and potential efficacy of intra-articular IC14 administration in patients with KOA. A small-scale, Phase I "first-in-joint" pilot and feasibility trial is therefore critical to inform the design and implementation of larger, definitive studies. Specifically, preliminary data are needed to (1) determine the appropriate inclusion/exclusion criteria, (2) solidify the study design and study processes,(3) assess patient tolerance and acceptability of i.a. mAb injection, (4) evaluate safety profiles of the localized biologic intervention. Participants will be randomized into one of three arms, (a placebo arm, a low-dose arm, and a high-dose arm) and will be followed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In recent years, pain in osteoarthritis has been tied to inflammation in the joint. For example, Philpott et al. found that, among 258 patients with KOA, moderate to severe synovitis on ultrasound was associated with a 2- to 4-fold increase in the risk of constant and intermittent pain. A prior study in 535 patients from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) cohort found that the presence of synovitis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was associated with a 9-fold increase in the risk of pain. Supporting these cross-sectional associations is the observation that corticosteroid injections, the use of which aims to reduce inflammation, have been a mainstay of treatment for years, though studies estimating these benefits are heterogeneous and suggest only modest effects 8,9. In addition to contributing to pain, synovitis is likely to contribute to the deterioration in joint structures including the progression of cartilage loss.10,11 For example, a recent study from the Osteoarthritis Initiative demonstrated that sustained synovitis on MRI was associated with more rapid structural progression over 4 years.

Despite evidence that synovitis plays a role in the symptoms and progression of the disease, to date, highly effective therapies to reduce pain in osteoarthritis by reducing synovitis have not been developed. This may be, in part, due to the complex nature of osteoarthritis pain as well as the lack of strong pathophysiologic rationale for prior therapies. For example, a number of trials evaluated the benefit of blocking Interleukin(IL)-1, with heterogeneous results suggesting small benefits.12

CD14 is a pattern-recognition co-receptor of the innate immune response that plays a critical role in mediating inflammatory responses to damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) present in osteoarthritic joints. In KOA, receptors like CD14 contribute to DAMP-activation of synovial macrophages which drive chronic low-grade inflammation through the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNF-α. These cytokines in turn sensitize nociceptors contributing to pain, and promote chondrocyte production of degradative enzymes accelerating joint degeneration. By blocking CD14, it may be possible to reduce macrophage activation and downstream inflammatory cascades within the knee, thus reducing symptoms and potentially affecting structural progression. Indeed, the investigators' published data in the murine destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) OA model suggests that deficiency of CD14 leads to reduced synovial cytokine expression after injury, mitigates development of pain-related behavior, and reduces cartilage loss.17 Thus, targeting CD14 represents a novel, mechanism-based approach to modulate synovial inflammation, potentially offering symptom relief with fewer side effects compared to traditional therapies. Fortunately, a neutralizing mAb against human CD14 (IC14) already exists and has extensive pre-clinical and in-human safety data from prior work in other conditions.15,16 Implicit Bioscience is preparing an IND submission for intra-articular use of IC14 in OA for this study. Further, the "first-in-human" studies have been performed (for systemic use) and have shown no serious safety concerns that would preclude further study.

This trial would represent the first human study of this novel injectable therapeutic agent. The goal of this 2-year study is to establish feasibility and initial safety of intra-articular injection with the goal of informing the design of a Merit-funded multi-site Phase II study to establish biologic efficacy and evaluate safety within the VA network.

The central study team includes experts in clinical epidemiology and clinical trials, rehabilitation medicine, osteoarthritis, and rheumatology at the VA. Joshua Baker is an Associate Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the CMCVAMC. He is a VA-funded investigator with an interest in obesity, muscle loss, physical functioning, and long-term outcomes in patients with common forms of arthritis. He is the Clinical Core 3 Co-Leader of the CReATE Motion Center, the Co-Director of the local Network of Dedicated Enrollment Sites (NODES) program, and Director of the Clinical Research Center at the CMCVAMC. He has served as the national PI for 2 RDT-funded trials including the MOVE-OK trial and the ongoing ReAKTIV trial. He has also served as a local site investigator (LSI) for several VA-funded clinical trials.

The CReATE Motion center was recently funded by VA RDT with the goal of promoting the more rapid translation of highly promising new therapeutics that have the potential to improve the lives of Veterans with osteoarthritis. Dr. Baker is the Director of the Clinical Core, which can provide project manager and research coordinator effort for center-related studies. In addition to this support, the center provides institutional knowledge and experience with clinical studies in KOA, including the ability to generate recruitment lists, organize off-site testing (e.g. MRI), contribution to screening and recruitment, and oversight of data integrity. These resources will be leveraged as part of this protocol.

The study is a randomized trial with 2 active dose levels (30 patients, randomized 1:1:1) with a 16-week follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed at 2-week intervals and safety as well as physical functioning assessed and blood draws performed at in-person visits at month 1 and 3. Participants may also have synovial fluid removed from their knee at in-person visits. Participants will undergo a non-contrast MRI scan before randomization and administration of the study drug or placebo. They will also receive another MRI at 3 months. The investigators aim to randomize 30 Veterans within 18 months.

In this currently proposed study, the highest dose the investigators will use will be 5 mL of 20 mg/mL IC14 drug (thus, 100 mg, which for a 70 kg patient will be 1.4 mg/kg). The investigators will use 100 mg and 40 mg as the doses for the high and low dose groups and compare to a control of saline only (0 mg). The syringes will be masked by the research pharmacist.

Participants will be monitored by study investigators and an independent data safety monitoring officer (DSMO) will be identified. The study will include regular clinical assessments, with moderate to severe events resulting in a pause to further randomizations after discussion with the IRB. A Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP) will be generated and approved by the DSMO. Standard procedures for medical emergencies will be followed. All adverse events will be reported to the IRB and applicable regulatory bodies in accordance with federal regulations.

There is no guarantee of direct benefit to participants. However, participants may benefit from increased clinical monitoring. The knowledge gained from this trial may benefit future patients by improving the understanding of CD14-targeted therapies and their safety profiles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Criswell LM Lavery, MPH
  • Phone Number: 215-823-4630

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ACR Classification Criteria for Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Pain >=5 on Visual Analogue Scale
  • Kelgren-Lawrence Grade >1
  • Joint Effusion on Exam
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious or hospitalized infection in last 1 year
  • Poorly controlled crystal arthritis in last 6 months
  • Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) testing <=3
  • History of diagnosed fibromyalgia
  • Receipt of corticosteroid in affected knee within 3 months
  • Receipt of visco-supplementation or other intra-articular therapy (other than corticosteroid) within 6 months
  • Ongoing participation in another interventional study
  • Inability to ambulate without assistive device
  • Pregnancy or Lactation
  • History of knee arthroplasty in either knee
  • Symptomatic heart failure
  • Glomerular filtration rate <45
  • Class III obesity (BMI>40 kg/m2)
  • Recent active malignancy (chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery within 3 months)
  • Poorly controlled diabetes (A1c>8%)
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Psoriatic Arthritis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Atibuclimab 100 mg
Intra-articular injection of Atibuclimab
Experimental: Atibuclimab 40 mg
Intra-articular injection of Atibuclimab
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (saline only)
2 mL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of screening and randomization
Time Frame: 2 years
The number of randomized participants relative to the number screened. The screening protocol will be considered feasible if 1/2 of screened patients are eligible to be randomized.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of study completion
Time Frame: 2 years
Rates of completion of study procedures. The design will be considered to be feasible if 90% complete 4-month follow-up from randomization.
2 years
Rates of serious adverse events
Time Frame: 4 months
The study will quantify emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and life-threatening events and determine relatedness. Rates will be quantified over 4 months of follow-up and evaluated descriptively by group.
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RRDC-003-23S-T1
  • 1915270 (Other Identifier: Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)

Clinical Trials on Atibuclimab (intra-articular)

Subscribe