A Comparison of Teledentistry vs Clinical Examination for Treatment Needs Assesment

May 30, 2026 updated by: Mustafa Sarp Kaya, Bezmialem Vakif University

Comparison of Teledentistry and Clinical Examination for Treatment Needs and Behavior Guidance in Preschool Children: A Cross-Sectional Study

Dental caries is one of the most common chronic diseases in children and may require complex dental treatment, especially in preschool-aged children. Because young children may have limited ability to cooperate during dental procedures, determining the urgency of treatment and the need for behavior guidance is an important part of treatment planning.

Teledentistry may provide an alternative method for the initial assessment of children who have difficulty accessing dental care. Through video calls and/or clinical photographs, dentists may be able to obtain information about the child's oral health status, pain complaints, treatment needs, and expected cooperation before an in-person visit.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the agreement between teledental examination and conventional clinical examination in preschool children. The study will compare the treatment needs identified during teledental examination with those identified during clinical examination. Treatment needs will be classified as urgent or elective. The study will also compare the recommended type of behavior guidance, categorized as non-pharmacological or pharmacological, between the two examination methods.

Healthy children aged 4 to 6 years who attend their first dental examination appointment and have no special care needs will be included after parental consent is obtained. Each child will undergo both a clinical examination and a teledental examination. During both examinations, data on pain complaints, dental caries experience, treatment needs, and predicted cooperation during dental treatment will be recorded using standardized forms.

The study hypothesis is that teledental examination will show acceptable agreement with clinical examination in identifying urgent and elective dental treatment needs and in determining the recommended type of behavior guidance in preschool children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was designed to evaluate the agreement between teledental examination and conventional clinical examination in determining dental treatment needs and the recommended type of behavior guidance in preschool children.

Dental caries is common in preschool-aged children and may require urgent or elective dental treatment. In this age group, treatment planning is affected not only by the presence and severity of dental disease but also by the child's developmental stage, previous dental experience, anxiety, and ability to cooperate. Teledentistry may provide a useful preliminary assessment method for children who have difficulty accessing dental care, particularly by helping clinicians identify urgent treatment needs and anticipate the need for behavior guidance before an in-person appointment.

Healthy children aged 4 to 6 years who attended their first dental examination appointment at the pediatric dentistry clinic were included after parental consent was obtained. Children with special care needs and children with an indication for general anesthesia due to another medical procedure were not included. Each participant underwent both a conventional clinical examination and a teledental examination.

The clinical examination was performed in the dental clinic with the child seated in the dental chair, under dental unit light, using a dental mirror and probe, and in the presence of a parent. The teledental examination was performed via a scheduled video call with the child and parent. During the teledental examination, information was obtained through visual assessment, parent-assisted intraoral observation when possible, and parent/child report of symptoms.

For both examination methods, data were recorded using standardized forms. The recorded variables included pain complaints, including spontaneous pain, provoked pain, and pain associated with food impaction. Each of these pain-related variables was recorded as present or absent. Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmf index for primary dentition. Treatment needs were categorized as urgent or elective according to the findings of each examination.

The recommended type of behavior guidance was also recorded for both examination methods. In determining the suggested behavior guidance approach, the child's dental history, medical history, parental report, expected cooperation, and clinical findings were considered. Behavior guidance recommendations were categorized as non-pharmacological or pharmacological. The predicted child behavior during dental treatment was recorded using the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale according to parental report.

Before the main study, inter-examiner reliability was evaluated in a group of children outside the study sample. Data obtained from the clinical and teledental examinations were then compared to assess agreement between the two examination methods.

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. Descriptive statistics were presented as mean, standard deviation, and frequency, as appropriate. The McNemar test was used to compare paired categorical variables between clinical examination and teledental examination. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to determine the level of agreement between the two examination methods. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

The main objective of the study was to determine whether teledental examination could provide acceptable agreement with conventional clinical examination in identifying urgent and elective treatment needs and in determining the recommended type of behavior guidance in preschool children.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Dentistry Department of PEdiatric Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Children attending an initial dental examination appointment at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakıf University, between July 2021 and November 2021, and who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent from parents/legal guardians.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children without any systemic mental or physical disorders
  • Children not using medication for psychiatric reasons
  • Children without diagnosed learning or comprehension difficulties (e.g., attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder)
  • Children without an indication for general anesthesia due to any other medical procedure
  • Children without transportation barriers to access the healthcare facility

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children whose parents/legal guardians refuse to sign the informed consent form
  • Children from families lacking the necessary equipment for video-based teleconferencing
  • Children whose parents/legal guardians do not consent to participation in video consultations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Minimal participant number to compare teledentistry and clinical exam
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021/ 105

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preschool Children

Clinical Trials on Tele- dentistry intraoral exam

Subscribe