iPath for CP Pilot (care partners)

June 2, 2026 updated by: Lisa A. Mistler, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Improving Screening and Access to Treatment for Depression in Care Partners of People Living With Dementia

Depression is a significant problem in care partners of people living with dementia; despite the expansion of options for accessing evidence-based treatments, most care partners of people living with dementia are not screened for depression and do not receive treatment. The objective of this project is to identify a screening method for depression that is feasible and acceptable to care partners and to adapt an innovative pathway to online evidence-based treatment for depression (iPath*D) as a means of increasing mental health literacy, screening rates and treatment access for care partners of people living with dementia. The results are expected to have a major positive impact by providing proof-of-principle for the use of an online pathway to evidence based treatment with the potential for reaching an unprecedented number of care partners who have unmet mental health needs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Depression affects up to 34% of care partners (CP) of people living with dementia (PLWD) each year and despite the expansion of treatments, most individuals do not receive treatment. Three key barriers to treatment exist: low detection, low mental health literacy (MHL) and limited treatment accessibility, exacerbated in rural settings. Innovative informatics solutions to barriers exist including automating screening, enhancing MHL through decision aids (DA) and increasing accessibility via location-independent, online treatments. Yet there is a gap in identifying strategies to screen and connect CP of PLWD with unmet mental health needs to treatments. The objective for this GEMSSTAR is to modify an innovative application, iPATH*D, developed previously by the research team, for CP of PLWD. iPath*D is an online platform that connects patients screening positive for clinically significant depression in rural cancer settings to a range of online and in-person evidence-based treatments. Investigators plan to adapt both the content and implementation of iPath*D, then establish its acceptability, usability, and feasibility, overcoming the unique challenges to help-seeking CP of PLWD. The specific aims are: Aim 1. Optimize and assess feasibility and acceptability of a pathway to identify care partners of persons living with dementia at risk for depression; and Aim 2. Determine feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing iPath*D with care partners of persons living with dementia and its preliminary impact on MHL, screening and treatment rates. The study tests the hypotheses that: (1) iPath*D will be acceptable and highly usable and will demonstrate preliminary impact of increased MHL, screening rates and treatment access. The development of iPath*D follows a user centered design model. In Aim 1 care partners (n=15) will co-design iPath*D via participatory design activities to inform the adaptations needed to the design and functionality of iPath*D, and development of low and high-fidelity iPath*D prototypes, which will go through rounds of iterative development, with extensive usability evaluations, ensuring iPath*D surpasses usability metrics. In Aim 2, an open label, single arm pilot, 15 care partners screening positive for depression will receive iPath*D. Real world usability, acceptability and feasibility will be assessed, and preliminary data on MHL, rates of screening and treatment access, treatment initiation, adherence, change in caregiver burden, and depression symptom improvement will be gathered. This research is innovative in developing and testing a novel services delivery model (iPath*D) that addresses existing barriers to care. The results are expected to have a major positive impact by providing proof-of-principle for the use of an online pathway to treatment with the potential for reaching an unprecedented number of individuals in rural settings with unmet mental health needs by understanding and implementing the optimal design of an innovative model of services delivery for CP of PLWD who experience depression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For 2 Week iPath*CP Pilot:

    1. Adults (≥18 years)
    2. Care partners of persons with dementia who score ≥5 on the PHQ-8 AND PHQ-9 screen
    3. Can communicate in English
    4. Have access to an Android based or Apple iOS based phone or tablet capable of running the iPath application.

For Debrief Interviews:

  • Care partners: Interviews will be conducted with a purposeful sample of 6 patients already consented into the study at the completion of T1 data collection, ensuring representation by sex (male/female), perceived usability (low/high) of iPath*CP and race/ethnicity.
  • Clinicians: Interviews will be conducted with clinicians and clinical staff who had patients involved in the project.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Care partners with:

    1. PHQ-8 score <5
    2. Answering positively for question 9 of the PHQ-9 who also screen positive for suicidal ideation with method, intent, plan or a recent prior suicide/self-harm attempt, as determined by a positive endorsement of items 3, 4, 5 or 6b ("Past 3 Months") on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and determined by Dr. Mistler, Psychiatrist at DH, not to be eligible.
    3. With bipolar disorder or psychosis (documented in the electronic medical record [EMR])
    4. With significant cognitive impairment (documented in the EMR or self-reported during eligibility screening)
    5. With no access to an Android or Apple device

For Debrief Interviews:

  • Patients: Participants withdrawn from the 2 Week iPath*CP Pilot.
  • Clinicians: None.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: iPath*CP app intervention arm
Care partners will upload the iPath*CP app and use it for 2 weeks. The app itself will screen for depression, provide information about depression in care partners of persons with dementia, offer a decision aid regarding depression treatments, and provide a curated list of treatment options.
iPath*CP is an app designed to screen for depression in care partners of persons with dementia, provide specific information about depression in care partners of persons with dementia, offers a decision aid to assist in deciding on treatment and also offers a curated list of potential treatment options, sortable by cost and time to access.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability of Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed after initial use of iPath app at T1 (2 weeks)
System Usability Scale (10 items; mean ≥68/100)
Assessed after initial use of iPath app at T1 (2 weeks)
Acceptability of Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (4 items).
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Feasibility of Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (4 items)
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Appropriateness of Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Appropriateness of Intervention Measure (4 items)
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Treatment access
Time Frame: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Proportion of patients selecting a treatment path to access e.g., click on link to access online treatment service | indicate in self-report survey accessing local resources
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Mental health literacy
Time Frame: Change between T0 and T1 (2 weeks)
A modified 10-item version for the validated multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) for depression assesses treatment knowledge, understanding & beliefs
Change between T0 and T1 (2 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PHQ-9 completion
Time Frame: Assessed at T0 and at 2 weeks (T1)
Proportion of patients completing in iPath*CP (≥70%, DH target)
Assessed at T0 and at 2 weeks (T1)
Treatment initiation
Time Frame: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Proportion of patients self-report treatment initiation e.g., filled antidepressant prescription | visited with psychiatrist for talk therapy | began a cCBT program | other service
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Proportion of patients self-report continued to adhere to treatment e.g., antidepressant refill (yes/no) | number of talk therapy sessions completed | cCBT modules completed
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Decisional regret
Time Frame: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
The Decisional Regret Scale assesses decisional regret with a healthcare decision (5-item).
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Symptom monitoring - PHQ-9
Time Frame: Change across 2 week period
Response, 5-point reduction in baseline PHQ-9 score. Remission; PHQ-9 score of <5.
Change across 2 week period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa A Mistler, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression - Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on depression app for care partners of persons with dementia

Subscribe