Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

iPath for CP Pilot (care partners)

12 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Lisa A. Mistler, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Improving Screening and Access to Treatment for Depression in Care Partners of People Living With Dementia

Depression is a significant problem in care partners of people living with dementia; despite the expansion of options for accessing evidence-based treatments, most care partners of people living with dementia are not screened for depression and do not receive treatment. The objective of this project is to identify a screening method for depression that is feasible and acceptable to care partners and to adapt an innovative pathway to online evidence-based treatment for depression (iPath*D) as a means of increasing mental health literacy, screening rates and treatment access for care partners of people living with dementia. The results are expected to have a major positive impact by providing proof-of-principle for the use of an online pathway to evidence based treatment with the potential for reaching an unprecedented number of care partners who have unmet mental health needs.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Depression affects up to 34% of care partners (CP) of people living with dementia (PLWD) each year and despite the expansion of treatments, most individuals do not receive treatment. Three key barriers to treatment exist: low detection, low mental health literacy (MHL) and limited treatment accessibility, exacerbated in rural settings. Innovative informatics solutions to barriers exist including automating screening, enhancing MHL through decision aids (DA) and increasing accessibility via location-independent, online treatments. Yet there is a gap in identifying strategies to screen and connect CP of PLWD with unmet mental health needs to treatments. The objective for this GEMSSTAR is to modify an innovative application, iPATH*D, developed previously by the research team, for CP of PLWD. iPath*D is an online platform that connects patients screening positive for clinically significant depression in rural cancer settings to a range of online and in-person evidence-based treatments. Investigators plan to adapt both the content and implementation of iPath*D, then establish its acceptability, usability, and feasibility, overcoming the unique challenges to help-seeking CP of PLWD. The specific aims are: Aim 1. Optimize and assess feasibility and acceptability of a pathway to identify care partners of persons living with dementia at risk for depression; and Aim 2. Determine feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing iPath*D with care partners of persons living with dementia and its preliminary impact on MHL, screening and treatment rates. The study tests the hypotheses that: (1) iPath*D will be acceptable and highly usable and will demonstrate preliminary impact of increased MHL, screening rates and treatment access. The development of iPath*D follows a user centered design model. In Aim 1 care partners (n=15) will co-design iPath*D via participatory design activities to inform the adaptations needed to the design and functionality of iPath*D, and development of low and high-fidelity iPath*D prototypes, which will go through rounds of iterative development, with extensive usability evaluations, ensuring iPath*D surpasses usability metrics. In Aim 2, an open label, single arm pilot, 15 care partners screening positive for depression will receive iPath*D. Real world usability, acceptability and feasibility will be assessed, and preliminary data on MHL, rates of screening and treatment access, treatment initiation, adherence, change in caregiver burden, and depression symptom improvement will be gathered. This research is innovative in developing and testing a novel services delivery model (iPath*D) that addresses existing barriers to care. The results are expected to have a major positive impact by providing proof-of-principle for the use of an online pathway to treatment with the potential for reaching an unprecedented number of individuals in rural settings with unmet mental health needs by understanding and implementing the optimal design of an innovative model of services delivery for CP of PLWD who experience depression.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

15

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For 2 Week iPath*CP Pilot:

    1. Adults (≥18 years)
    2. Care partners of persons with dementia who score ≥5 on the PHQ-8 AND PHQ-9 screen
    3. Can communicate in English
    4. Have access to an Android based or Apple iOS based phone or tablet capable of running the iPath application.

For Debrief Interviews:

  • Care partners: Interviews will be conducted with a purposeful sample of 6 patients already consented into the study at the completion of T1 data collection, ensuring representation by sex (male/female), perceived usability (low/high) of iPath*CP and race/ethnicity.
  • Clinicians: Interviews will be conducted with clinicians and clinical staff who had patients involved in the project.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Care partners with:

    1. PHQ-8 score <5
    2. Answering positively for question 9 of the PHQ-9 who also screen positive for suicidal ideation with method, intent, plan or a recent prior suicide/self-harm attempt, as determined by a positive endorsement of items 3, 4, 5 or 6b ("Past 3 Months") on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and determined by Dr. Mistler, Psychiatrist at DH, not to be eligible.
    3. With bipolar disorder or psychosis (documented in the electronic medical record [EMR])
    4. With significant cognitive impairment (documented in the EMR or self-reported during eligibility screening)
    5. With no access to an Android or Apple device

For Debrief Interviews:

  • Patients: Participants withdrawn from the 2 Week iPath*CP Pilot.
  • Clinicians: None.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: iPath*CP app intervention arm
Care partners will upload the iPath*CP app and use it for 2 weeks. The app itself will screen for depression, provide information about depression in care partners of persons with dementia, offer a decision aid regarding depression treatments, and provide a curated list of treatment options.
Otro: depression app for care partners of persons with dementia
iPath*CP is an app designed to screen for depression in care partners of persons with dementia, provide specific information about depression in care partners of persons with dementia, offers a decision aid to assist in deciding on treatment and also offers a curated list of potential treatment options, sortable by cost and time to access.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Usability of Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed after initial use of iPath app at T1 (2 weeks)
System Usability Scale --a widely used, free questionnaire that measures the perceived usability of a product, system, or website. Developed by John Brooke in 1986, it provides a quick, reliable, and standardized way to capture subjective user feedback after they interact with a product. 10 items. Each item uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Score ranges from 0 - 100 points, with lower scores indicating less perceived usability.
Assessed after initial use of iPath app at T1 (2 weeks)
Acceptability of Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure -- A 4-item measure of perceived intervention acceptability. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely Disagree- 5=Completely Agree). Score is calculated mean, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Feasibility of Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure. A 4-item measure of perceived intervention feasibility. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely Disagree- 5=Completely Agree). Score is calculated mean, with higher scores indicating greater perceived feasibility.
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Appropriateness of Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Appropriateness of Intervention Measure. A 4-item measure of perceived intervention appropriateness. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely Disagree- 5=Completely Agree). Score is calculated mean, with higher scores indicating greater perceived appropriateness.
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Treatment access
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Proportion of participants selecting a treatment path to access e.g., participants clicked on link to access online treatment service or indicated in self-report survey that they accessed local resources
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Mental health literacy
Periodo de tiempo: Change between T0 and T1 (2 weeks)
A modified 10-item version for the validated multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) for depression assesses treatment knowledge, understanding & beliefs. Some questions are "true-false" and some are 4 choice multiple choice. Higher overall score (number correct out of 10 total) indicates better understanding of depression and its treatments.
Change between T0 and T1 (2 weeks)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
PHQ-9 completion
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at T0 and at 2 weeks (T1)
Proportion of participants out of total completing the PHQ-9 survey in iPath*CP app at T0 and T1 (≥70% completing PHQ-9 is our target). PHQ-9 itself is a standard depression screen with 9 items. Each of the 9 items is rated on a scale of 0 to 3 based on how often the problem has bothered the participant: 0=Not at all; 1=Several days; 2=More than half the days; 3=Nearly every day. Overall score ranges from 0 to 27, with 27 indicating severe depression.
Assessed at T0 and at 2 weeks (T1)
Treatment initiation
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Proportion of participants that self-report treatment initiation e.g., filled antidepressant prescription, visited with psychiatrist or therapist for talk therapy, began a cCBT program.
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Treatment adherence
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Proportion of participants that self-report continuing to adhere to treatment e.g., antidepressant refill (yes/no), number of talk therapy sessions completed, number of cCBT modules completed.
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Decisional regret
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
The Decisional Regret Scale assesses decisional regret with a healthcare decision. The Decisional Regret Scale is a 5-item Likert scale. Respondents read each statement and use the response options to indicate how much they agree or disagree with the statement. The scale numbers range from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5). A total of 0 = no regret and 100 indicates high regret.
Assessed at end of study, T1 (2 weeks)
Symptom monitoring - PHQ-9
Periodo de tiempo: Change across 2 week period
Response, 5-point reduction in baseline PHQ-9 score. PHQ-9 is a standard depression screen with 9 items. Each of the 9 items is rated on a scale of 0 to 3 based on how often the problem has bothered the participant: 0=Not at all; 1=Several days; 2=More than half the days; 3=Nearly every day. Overall score ranges from 0 to 27, with 27 indicating severe depression. Remission; PHQ-9 score of <5.
Change across 2 week period

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Colaboradores

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Lisa A Mistler, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de enero de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de febrero de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

2 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

5 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

16 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • STUDY02003455
  • R03AG088962-01 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir