The Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks as a Solo Anesthetic Technique in High Risk Patients Undergoing Unilateral Above Knee Amputation .

June 6, 2026 updated by: paula atef gobran kamil, Kasr El Aini Hospital

The Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks as a Solo Anesthetic Technique in High Risk Patients Undergoing Unilateral Above Knee Amputation : A Randomized Double Blinded Study

The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided combined supra-inguinal fascia iliaca and proximal sciatic nerve blocks used as a solo anesthetic technique in high-risk patients undergoing unilateral above knee amputation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Above knee amputation (AKA) is a major surgical procedure often performed for non salvageable lower limb such as severe trauma , peripheral arterial diseases or infection . however it carries significant risks and complications . The overall mortality and morbidity rates are also substantial, with one-year mortality rates reported as high as 40-50% in some populations.

Anesthesia in above-knee amputation procedures poses its own set of risks, especially in patients with advanced age or multiple comorbidities. General anesthesia (GA) may be associated with postoperative pulmonary complications, prolonged recovery, and hemodynamic instability. On the other hand, spinal anesthesia offers benefits such as reduced thromboembolic events and faster postoperative recovery, but carries risks including hypotension, spinal hematoma, and post-dural puncture headache .

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) as a solo anesthetic technique offer significant hemodynamic advantages compared to neuroaxial and general anesthesia , this makes them especially beneficial for patients with cardiovascular compromise or bad chest conditions.

Effective pain management is crucial to improve patient outcomes, promoting early mobilization, and reducing the risks of complications such as deep vein thrombosis or chronic pain syndromes .

Patients with multiple risk factors such as cardiovascular disease, respiratory problems have a higher risk of complications when general or spinal anesthesia is used. In such cases ultrasound guided regional anesthesia becomes an excellent alternative .. So The combination of supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block and sciatic nerve block has emerged as a promising regional anesthetic approach for above-knee amputation, particularly in patients who are poor candidates for general or neuraxial anesthesia. This technique provides comprehensive coverage of the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, and sciatic nerves, allowing for adequate surgical anesthesia without the need for airway manipulation. It offers advantages such as hemodynamic stability, reduced opioid consumption, and fewer respiratory complications, making it especially beneficial in elderly and high-risk patients. When performed under ultrasound guidance, this approach enhances block accuracy and safety, positioning it as a viable solo anesthetic technique for AKA. The technique allows for adequate surgical anesthesia with preserved hemodynamic stability and minimal systemic drug exposure. Clinical reports have demonstrated its success in providing effective anesthesia with high patient and surgeon satisfaction, especially when performed under ultrasound guidance.

Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha 2- adrenoceptor agonist possessing sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties which could improve the quality of the block while reducing opioid consumption and their associated side effects. It reduces pain after knee arthroscopy mainly by peripheral and central mechanisms through stimulation of presynaptic α2- adrenoceptors .

On the other hand, fentanyl, an opioid, is commonly used to provide potent analgesia in regional blocks but carries risks of respiratory depression and other opioid-related complications . There over, this study aims to compare dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvant to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supra inguinal fascia iliaca and sciatic nerve block for anesthetic management for unilateral above knee amputation in high risk patients as a solo anesthetic technique ..

While several studies have evaluated the efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks in lower limb surgeries, few have investigated their use as a sole anesthetic technique specifically in high-risk patients undergoing above-knee amputation (AKA). Moreover, the comparative role of different adjuvants such as dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl in this setting remains underexplored. There is a clear need for well-designed randomized trials to guide anesthetic decision-making in this fragile patient population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • KasrELainiH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Age ≥18 years
  • Both sexes
  • ASA III-IV
  • Documented cardiac disease (e.g., EF < 40%, NYHA II or higher)
  • Documented pulmonary disease (e.g., COPD with FEV1 < 60%)
  • Scheduled for above-knee amputations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological or intellectual disability
  • Drug abuse
  • Allergy to study drugs
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, local infection)
  • Significant renal or hepatic impairment( plts <75000 or INR >1.5)
  • Current anticoagulant therapy
  • severe haemodynamically unstability at the time of block performance, defined as map > 65 mmhg but achieved by high-dose vasopressors (e.g., norepinephrine ≥ 0.1 mcg/kg/min) after fluid ressuscitation .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: dexmedetomidine group
patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks for above-knee amputation with dexmedetomidine added to the local anesthetic solution
Dexmedetomidine added as an adjuvant to the local anesthetic solution during peripheral nerve block for above-knee amputation surgery.
Active Comparator: fentanyl group
patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks for above-knee amputation with fentanyl added to the local anesthetic solution
Fentanyl added as an adjuvant to the local anesthetic solution during peripheral nerve block for above-knee amputation surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to the first request for the rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
the first time the patient needs analgesia postoperative
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total morphine consumption postoperative.
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
the total dose of morphine given to the patient in the 24 hours postoperative
24 hours postoperative
Intraoperative Pain score (VAS).
Time Frame: from block performance till 24 hours postopertaive
assessment of pain intensity using the visual analogue score (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicate the worst pain imaginable , higher scores indicate worse pain
from block performance till 24 hours postopertaive
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
by a scale from 1 to 5 where is 1 is very dissatisfied and 5 is very satisfied higher scores indicate greater patient satisfaction
24 hours postoperative
intraoperative heart rate
Time Frame: intraoperative
measurments of intraoperative HR every 5 mins
intraoperative
Complications ( nausea - vomiting - bradycardia - hypotension .... )
Time Frame: 24 hours post operative
Any complication that happened intra or post operative
24 hours post operative
intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: intraoperative
measurment of MAP every 5 mins
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Above Knee Amputation

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

Subscribe