Fluorescent Probe for Assessment of Renal Elimination (FLARE)

June 8, 2026 updated by: Aaron Cook
Accurate measures of kidney function is important for precision dosing of many medications. The current methods of determining kidney function largely hinge on the use of equations that use common laboratory values such as serum creatinine & static variables like age & weight. These are helpful for trending over time, but often are inaccurate during times of medical illness. Other more accurate methods of measuring kidney function include urine collection, although this is not commonly used because of various reasons that make the collection inconvenient or unreliable. The new transdermal glomerular filtration (tGFR) device permits accurate, real-time evaluation of kidney function. This novel method has not been rigorously compared with urine collection & other methods of determining kidney function in hospitalized patients. The goal of the study is to compare tGFR with other accepted methods of determining kidney function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The majority of acutely ill patients exhibit changes in renal function due to inflammation, increased solute generation, and iatrogenic factors such as fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. The pharmacokinetics of renally eliminated medications (eg. levetiracetam, cefepime, vancomycin) are frequently affected by inflammatory processes despite normal estimations in creatinine clearance resulting in suboptimal serum drug concentrations and therapeutic failure. Despite the prevalence of fluctuations in renal function in acute illness, real-time assessment is limited to monitoring of serum biomarkers such as creatinine and cystatin C, as well as urine output, which typically lag behind important changes in function. Furthermore, use of creatinine clearance equations based on anthropomorphic data correlates poorly with actual renal function, potentially misleading clinicians as to the progression of disease and the need for dose adjustment of important medications in this vulnerable population.

Limitations of current approaches for evaluating renal function in the acutely ill Estimation of GFR or creatinine clearance can be accomplished by numerous equations, the majority of which have been validated in non-critically ill adults, usually with a relatively high percent of patients with chronic kidney disease. These equations are often not accurate in patients with acutely worsening renal function. Likewise, while these equations are helpful for categorizing renal function and assessing appropriate medication dosing in otherwise healthy, ambulatory patients. Under-prediction of creatinine clearance values leads clinicians to consistently under-dose critical medications such as beta-lactam antibiotics, vancomycin, or antiseizure medications such as levetiracetam.

Proactive measurement of creatinine clearance can provide a more accurate depiction of GFR but is fraught with complications. Iohexol serum concentrations correlate well with GFR, but requires intravenous administration of iohexol, which has a small risk of infusion reaction and hypersensitivity, and serial blood samples. Measured urine creatinine clearance is also feasible but inconvenient in most hospitalized patients. mClCr requires bladder catheterization for accurate urine volume, consistent storage on ice for the duration of collection (between 8 and 24 hours), and prompt delivery of the large volume container to the local laboratory for creatinine analysis. Each of these criteria introduce variability into the measurement and are often unnoticed or undocumented, introducing inaccuracy into the mClCr values. The lack of a real-time, accurate assessment of creatinine clearance in the acutely ill population is a gap in practice and represents a resolvable problem in the process of individualized and precision dosing of medications in this vulnerable and high-risk population.

This study represents an important innovation in advancing the understanding of fluctuations in renal function during acute illness. The current study will validate the safety of transdermal GFR monitoring to provide real-time measurement of renal function in patients with stable renal function. Further, the reliability of transdermal GFR monitoring will be compared to current standards of renal function assessment. The results of this study will advance the field by validating the use of a real-time physiologic assessment of GFR rather than using labor intensive, invasive tests that may lag behind current renal function. Numerous important gaps remain with this new technology, including use primarily in the ambulatory, stable renal function populations. Thus, this study is potentially the first step in evaluating renal function across the acute care continuum.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Aaron Cook, PharmD
  • Phone Number: 18592578444
  • Email: amcook0@uky.edu

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • UKHealthCare/University of Kentucky

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years old
  • critically ill or acutely ill hospitalized patients admitted to the intensive care unit
  • Stable/normal renal function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prisoners
  • Pregnant women
  • Laboratory evidence of unstable kidney function (KDIGO AKI stage 1-3--This includes subjects with Scr > 1.5x baseline)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MediBeacon Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Monitoring
IV push of relmapirazin (Lumitrace) prior to use of the tGFR device
Small IV push bolus of iohexol as a probe for renal function will be administered prior to use of the tGFR device.
The tGFR monitor will be applied to the patient after relmapirazin bolus for measurement of GFR.
8-hour urine creatinine clearance collection will be performed during the study period to compare to tGFR & other renal function measures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (tGFR) Monitoring Accuracy
Time Frame: 8 Hours
Accuracy of transdermal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) monitoring compared with measured urine creatinine clearance.
8 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relmapirazin Elimination Half-Life
Time Frame: 12 hours
Elimination half-life of Relmapirazin calculated from serial serum concentration measurements obtained over 12 hours following intravenous administration.
12 hours
Iohexol Elimination Half-Life
Time Frame: 12 hours
Elimination half-life of Iohexol calculated from serial serum concentration measurements obtained over 12 hours following intravenous administration.
12 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron M Cook, PharmD, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science
  • Study Director: Juan-Carlos Aycinena, MD, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Nephrology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 8, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Relmapirazin

Subscribe