- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07661836
Personalized Online Occupational Therapy Intervention for Adults With Scleroderma
Pilot Exploratory Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a Personalized Online Occupational Therapy Intervention Versus Usual Care in Adults With Scleroderma
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Scleroderma is a chronic connective tissue disease that may be associated with skin and visceral fibrosis, pain, fatigue, stiffness, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, vascular alterations, and functional limitations. From an occupational perspective, these manifestations may affect activities of daily living, self-care, work, leisure, social participation, quality of life, hand function, and occupational balance.
This study is based on a previous cohort of adults with scleroderma in Spain, in which information was collected on functioning, quality of life, occupational balance, hand function, symptoms, assistive products, and unmet needs. The present phase aims to implement and preliminarily evaluate a personalized, occupation-centered, online occupational therapy intervention.
The study is a pilot exploratory parallel-group randomized controlled trial with individual allocation in a 1:1 ratio. It is coordinated by the University of Zaragoza and delivered remotely. Participants take part from their home or community environment in Spain. The intervention group receives eight individual online occupational therapy sessions, approximately 50-60 minutes each, twice weekly over four weeks, through Google Meet and without recording. The intervention is individualized according to baseline assessment and the first session, including personalized occupational goals using SMART criteria and Goal Attainment Scaling. The control group continues with usual care and does not receive additional intervention from the research team during the intervention and follow-up period. After completing follow-up, the control group will receive access to general educational materials and will be offered an online educational group session.
The primary feasibility outcome is the proportion of intervention-group participants who complete at least six of the eight planned sessions at post-intervention assessment. The pre-specified feasibility threshold is at least 70%. Secondary outcomes include acceptability, adherence, safety, and technical feasibility. Exploratory clinical and occupational outcomes include WHODAS 2.0, WHOQOL-BREF, Occupational Balance Questionnaire, Cochin Hand Function Scale, and Goal Attainment Scaling in the intervention group.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Zaragoza / Aragón
-
Zaragoza, Zaragoza / Aragón, Spain, 50009
- Universidad de Zaragoza
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18 years or older with scleroderma from the previous project cohort and meeting the general eligibility criteria of the initial study.
- Current residence in Spain.
- Sufficient Spanish language ability to provide informed consent, participate in the intervention, and complete study assessments.
- Ability to understand the study information and provide informed consent, with support if needed.
- Access to the internet and to a device compatible with Google Meet and Hefora.
- Availability to participate in eight online sessions of approximately 60 minutes, twice weekly over four weeks.
- Not currently participating in a specific occupational therapy program or another intervention that could substantially influence functioning, activities of daily living, quality of life, or occupational balance.
- Provision of informed consent and completion of the baseline assessment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical condition or severe comorbidity preventing safe participation.
- Current residence outside Spain.
- Inability to provide informed consent or complete the baseline assessment.
- Concurrent participation in a specific occupational therapy program or another intensive, potentially interfering rehabilitation or therapeutic education intervention.
- Withdrawal of interest before the effective start of the intervention or inability to participate during the planned study dates.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Personalized Online Occupational Therapy Plus Usual Care
Participants allocated to the intervention group will receive eight individual online occupational therapy sessions over four weeks, with two sessions per week, delivered by videoconference and added to usual care.
Sessions will be individualized according to baseline assessment and participant goals and may include goal setting, hand preparation for occupation, self-care and pain management, energy conservation, daily planning, environmental adaptations, assistive product guidance, occupational balance, functional integration, and a maintenance plan.
Sessions will not be recorded.
|
The intervention consists of eight individual online occupational therapy sessions delivered over four weeks, with two sessions per week, through videoconference and without recording.
Sessions are individualized according to baseline assessment, participant needs, and personalized occupational goals.
The intervention may include goal setting using SMART criteria and Goal Attainment Scaling, hand preparation for occupation, self-care and pain management strategies, energy conservation, daily planning, environmental adaptations, assistive product guidance, occupational balance strategies, functional integration, and a maintenance plan.
The intervention is delivered in addition to usual care.
|
|
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Participants allocated to the control group will continue with their usual health and social care during the intervention and follow-up period.
They will not receive additional occupational therapy from the research team during this period.
Changes in usual care will be recorded at post-intervention and follow-up assessments.
After completing follow-up, participants in this arm will receive access to general educational materials and will be offered an online educational group session.
|
Usual care refers to the ordinary health and social care that participants receive in their usual context.
It is not administered by the research team.
Participants allocated to this arm will not receive additional occupational therapy from the research team during the intervention and follow-up period.
Changes in usual care will be recorded at post-intervention and follow-up assessments.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility: intervention completion
Time Frame: From baseline to post-intervention, approximately 4 weeks.
|
Percentage of participants allocated to the intervention group who complete at least 6 of the 8 planned online occupational therapy sessions.
The pre-specified feasibility threshold is 70% or higher.
|
From baseline to post-intervention, approximately 4 weeks.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability: session satisfaction
Time Frame: After each intervention session during the 4-week intervention period.
|
Participant satisfaction after each intervention session, assessed using Likert-type items scored from 1 to 5 and open-ended questions.
Items address perceived usefulness, integration into daily routine, comprehension, self-efficacy, perceived safety, and suggestions for improvement.
|
After each intervention session during the 4-week intervention period.
|
|
Acceptability: final intervention satisfaction questionnaire score
Time Frame: Post-intervention, approximately 4 weeks after baseline.
|
Final satisfaction with the intervention will be assessed in the intervention group using a structured final intervention satisfaction questionnaire administered at post-intervention.
The questionnaire includes Likert-type items scored from 1 to 5. A mean satisfaction score will be calculated across the Likert-type items, with higher scores indicating greater intervention acceptability and satisfaction.Open-ended questions will also be used to collect qualitative feedback on acceptability, perceived usefulness, and suggestions for improvement; these qualitative responses will be summarized descriptively and will not be included in the numerical score.
|
Post-intervention, approximately 4 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Complementary adherence: Percentage of expected weekly diaries completed
Time Frame: Weekly during the 4-week intervention period.
|
Complementary adherence will be assessed in the intervention group using the weekly participant diary.
The outcome will be reported as the percentage of expected weekly diaries completed by each participant during the 4-week intervention period.
Four weekly diaries are expected per participant.
The percentage ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence to weekly diary completion.
|
Weekly during the 4-week intervention period.
|
|
Complementary adherence: Percentage of agreed home-based tasks completed
Time Frame: Weekly during the 4-week intervention period and post-intervention, approximately 4 weeks after baseline.
|
Completion of agreed home-based tasks will be assessed in the intervention group using participant self-reports recorded in the weekly diary and adherence record.
Each week, task completion will be recorded as completed, partially completed, or not completed.
The outcome will be reported as the percentage of agreed home-based tasks completed during the intervention period.
The percentage ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence to the agreed home-based tasks.
|
Weekly during the 4-week intervention period and post-intervention, approximately 4 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Complementary adherence: Percentage of intervention materials reviewed
Time Frame: Weekly during the 4-week intervention period and post-intervention, approximately 4 weeks after baseline.
|
Review of intervention materials will be assessed in the intervention group using participant self-reports recorded in the weekly diary and adherence record.
Each week, participants will report whether they reviewed the materials shared with them.
The outcome will be reported as the percentage of intervention materials reviewed during the intervention period.
The percentage ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence to reviewing the intervention materials.
|
Weekly during the 4-week intervention period and post-intervention, approximately 4 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Safety: adverse events
Time Frame: Continuously during the intervention period and at post-intervention and follow-up assessments, up to approximately 8 weeks after baseline.
|
Number of adverse events and number of participants with at least one adverse event, classified by severity, relationship with the intervention, outcome, and whether the event led to interruption, adaptation, or discontinuation of a session.
|
Continuously during the intervention period and at post-intervention and follow-up assessments, up to approximately 8 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Technical feasibility
Time Frame: Continuously during the intervention period and assessment windows, up to approximately 8 weeks after baseline.
|
Frequency, type, and impact of technical incidents affecting online intervention delivery, participant participation, or online data collection.
|
Continuously during the intervention period and assessment windows, up to approximately 8 weeks after baseline.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in functioning assessed by the Spanish version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 4 weeks, and follow-up at approximately 8 weeks.
|
Functioning will be assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
Scores will be transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicates full disability.
Higher scores indicate worse functioning or greater disability.
Change from baseline to post-intervention and from baseline to follow-up will be described.
|
Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 4 weeks, and follow-up at approximately 8 weeks.
|
|
Change in quality of life assessed by the Spanish version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 4 weeks, and follow-up at approximately 8 weeks.
|
Quality of life will be assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF.
The questionnaire provides four domain scores: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment.
Domain scores will be transformed to a 0 to 100 scale.
Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Change from baseline to post-intervention and from baseline to follow-up will be described.
|
Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 4 weeks, and follow-up at approximately 8 weeks.
|
|
Change in occupational balance assessed by the Spanish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 4 weeks, and follow-up at approximately 8 weeks.
|
Occupational balance will be assessed using the Spanish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire.
The questionnaire consists of 13 items, each scored from 0 to 5. The total score ranges from 0 to 65, with higher scores indicating greater occupational balance.
Change from baseline to post-intervention and from baseline to follow-up will be described.
|
Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 4 weeks, and follow-up at approximately 8 weeks.
|
|
Change in hand function assessed by the Spanish version of the Cochin Hand Function Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 4 weeks, and follow-up at approximately 8 weeks.
|
Hand function will be assessed using the Cochin Hand Function Scale.
The scale includes 18 items assessing difficulty in performing hand-related daily activities.
The total score ranges from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating worse hand function or greater hand-related disability.
Change from baseline to post-intervention and from baseline to follow-up will be described.
|
Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 4 weeks, and follow-up at approximately 8 weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sandra M Espín Tello, PhD, Universidad de Zaragoza
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S, Vilagut G, Alonso J, Cieza A, Svetskova O, Burger H, Racca V, Francescutti C, Vieta E, Kostanjsek N, Raggi A, Leonardi M, Ferrer M; MHADIE consortium. Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 May 19;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-51.
- Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
- Lucas-Carrasco R. The WHO quality of life (WHOQOL) questionnaire: Spanish development and validation studies. Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9926-3. Epub 2011 May 25.
- Peral-Gomez P, Lopez-Roig S, Pastor-Mira MA, Abad-Navarro E, Valera-Gran D, Hakansson C, Wagman P. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire: An Instrument for Occupation-Based Research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 14;18(14):7506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147506.
- Chan AW, Boutron I, Hopewell S, Moher D, Schulz KF, Collins GS, Tunn R, Aggarwal R, Berkwits M, Berlin JA, Bhandari N, Butcher NJ, Campbell MK, Chidebe RCW, Elbourne DR, Farmer AJ, Fergusson DA, Golub RM, Goodman SN, Hoffmann TC, Ioannidis JPA, Kahan BC, Knowles RL, Lamb SE, Lewis S, Loder E, Offringa M, Ravaud P, Richards DP, Rockhold FW, Schriger DL, Siegfried NL, Staniszewska S, Taylor RS, Thabane L, Torgerson DJ, Vohra S, White IR, Hrobjartsson A. SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials. BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081477. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081477.
- Arreguin Reyes R, Lopez Lopez CO, Alvarez Hernandez E, Medrano Ramirez G, Montes Castillo Mde L, Vazquez-Mellado J. Evaluation of hand function in rheumatic disease. Validation and usefulness of the Spanish version AUSCAN, m-SACRAH and Cochin questionnaires. Reumatol Clin. 2012 Sep-Oct;8(5):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 May 17.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- C.I. PI26/254
- 216213 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Asociación Española de Esclerodermia)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Scleroderma
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedSYSTEMIC SCLERODERMAUnited States
-
Gilead SciencesCompletedDiffuse Scleroderma | Limited SclerodermaAustralia
-
Mastelli S.r.lSintesi Research SrlTerminatedScleroderma DiseaseItaly
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteNovartis PharmaceuticalsTerminated
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingScleroderma, Localized | Scleroderma | Functionality | Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) | Scleroderma (Limited and Diffuse)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingScleroderma, Localized | Scleroderma | Swallowing | Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) | Scleroderma (Limited and Diffuse)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRecruitingScleroderma, Localized | Morphea | Frontal Linear Scleroderma en Coup de Sabre | Scleroderma, Circumscribed | Scleroderma, LinearUnited States
-
Rennes University HospitalCompleted
-
University of CologneCompletedLocalized SclerodermaGermany
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownLocalized SclerodermaEgypt
Clinical Trials on Personalized Online Occupational Therapy Intervention
-
South China Normal UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Sleep | Sedentary BehaviourChina
-
Ankara Medipol UniversityCompletedFeeding and Eating Disorders | Child Behavior Problem | Feeding Behavior | Occupational Therapy | Online InterventionTurkey
-
Ankara Medipol UniversityActive, not recruitingLong-Term Effect of Online Occupational Therapy-Based Parent Training on Feeding Problems in InfantsFood Neophobia | Feeding Problems | Feeding DifficultiesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiCompletedHip OsteoarthritisTurkey
-
Ankara Medipol UniversityMedipol University; Yeditepe UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Activities of Daily LivingTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Hacettepe UniversityAuthorsCompleted
-
University of FloridaCompleted
-
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de AlbaceteInstituto Ciencias de la Salud, Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La ManchaCompletedOccupational TherapySpain
-
Selin Başak ArslanerCompletedCaregiver | Occupational Balance | Occupational Performance | Occupational SatisfactionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
McGill UniversityJewish Rehabilitation HospitalRecruiting