Effects of a Structured Occupational Therapy Intervention in an Acute Geriatric Unit

Effects of a Structured Occupational Therapy Intervention in an Acute Geriatric Unit. A Randomised Clinical Trial

Objectives: To compare the benefits of structured occupational therapy intervention by a single geriatric therapist with the benefits of the conventional treatment model in the functional recovery of patients admitted to an acute geriatric unit.

Design: Non-pharmacological randomised clinical trial. Setting: Acute Geriatric Unit, Albacete, Spain. Participants: The trial included 400 patients admitted consecutively over 6 months to an acute geriatric unit for acute illness or exacerbation of a chronic medical condition. Participants were randomised to the occupational therapy intervention or conventional treatment model group; 198 patients received occupational therapy. All patients completed the study. The mean age was 83.5, and 56.8% were women.

Interventions: Needs assessment, iatrogenic prevention, retraining in basic and instrumental activities of daily living, assessment of need for technical aids, instruction for primary caregiver in patient mobilisation techniques, and structured social and occupational motivation as per protocol in three groups of patients (cardiopulmonary disease, stroke, and other conditions) 5 days a week, 30 to 45 minutes a day over the entire hospital stay.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Occupational Therapy
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Occupational therapy intervention

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 400
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Spain
  • Albacete, Spain, 02006
    • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 65 years and older (Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• All patients age 65 or older consecutively admitted to the acute geriatric unit at the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario in Albacete, Spain, between November 2002 and June 2003 for an acute medical illness or exacerbation of a previous chronic condition

Exclusion Criteria:

• None

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Occupational therapy intervention (OTI); 198 subjects. The OTI schedule consisted of a daily 45-minute session, Monday through Friday, for the duration of hospitalisation. Activities were carried out in a structured manner and varied according to need and day of admission. On the first day, the patient's needs were analysed, including the need for iatrogenic prevention, retraining in basic and instrumental activities of daily living, technical aids, instruct the primary caregiver in patient mobilisation techniques, and social and occupational motivation. All OTI participants received an average of 5 sessions during hospitalisation.	Other: Occupational therapy intervention; Day 1: Physical, functional, cognitive, social, and emotional assessment. Need analysis for iatrogenic prevention, retraining in BADL and IADL, technical aids, instructions in patient mobilisation techniques, and for social and occupational motivation. Day 2 until discharge: 45-minute sessions. Cognitive stimulation and confusional syndrome prevention, instructions to the caregivers on how to prevent complications such as immobility, delirium, falls, urinary incontinence, or pressure sores, and patient stimulation, retraining in activities of daily living. Day of discharge: Instruction for caregivers on managing the patient's residual deficits, assessment for technical aids, recommendations for patient increased independence in ADL, and social and occupational activities.
No Intervention: Conventional treatment model group; 202 subjects. All subjects received medical treatment, nursing care, physical therapy, and social assistance in accordance with the usual practice of the geriatrics unit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Functional recovery	Recovery of 10 or more Barthel index points	The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Confusional status	Confusion Assessment Method	The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days)
Death		The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days)
Hospital stay		The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days)
Upper limb function improvement	Touching either shoulder blade with the hand, picking up a full glass of water, unbuttoning a button, and cutting with a knife. Improvement was defined as the ability to perform more such functions at discharge compared with admission.	The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days)
Improvement in gait pattern	Increase of one level on the Holden scale between admission and discharge	The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days)
Residence change	Institutionalisation and residence change because of a new disability	The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete
• Collaborators: Instituto Ciencias de la Salud, Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Abizanda P, Navarro JL, Romero L, Leon M, Sanchez-Jurado PM, Dominguez L. Upper extremity function, an independent predictor of adverse events in hospitalized elderly. Gerontology. 2007;53(5):267-73. doi: 10.1159/000102541. Epub 2007 May 8.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: November 1, 2002
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2003
• Study Completion (Actual): June 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 23, 2010
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 25, 2010
• First Posted (Estimate): March 26, 2010

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): April 12, 2010
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 9, 2010
• Last Verified: February 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL; AGED; PATIENT CARE
• Other Study ID Numbers: PI02069-00