Carbohydrate Availability and Running Performance in Professional Male Footballers

June 23, 2026 updated by: Stefan Pettersson, Göteborg University

The Effect of Varying Carbohydrate Intake on Training Performance in Professional Football Players

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how different daily carbohydrate intakes affect training performance in professional male football players during a pre-season training week.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does a higher carbohydrate intake affect how much high-speed running and sprinting players complete during football training?
  • Does a higher carbohydrate intake affect players' jumping performance, perceived effort, recovery, and daily readiness?

Researchers will compare two carbohydrate intakes. In one condition, participants will consume a moderate-carbohydrate diet. In the other condition, participants will consume the same base diet plus carbohydrate drinks. The drinks will look and taste similar, but only one type will contain extra carbohydrate.

Participants will complete both conditions during two pre-season training weeks. The order of the conditions will be randomized. This means participants will be assigned by chance to start with either the moderate-carbohydrate condition or the higher-carbohydrate condition.

During the study, participants will:

  • Follow a standardized diet during each training week
  • Drink three study beverages per day during each condition
  • Take part in their regular team football training
  • Wear a global positioning system device during training to measure running activity
  • Complete countermovement jump tests during the training weeks
  • Report their perceived effort, recovery, and daily readiness

This study will help researchers understand whether changing carbohydrate intake during a normal football training week affects training output and recovery-related measures in professional football players.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study used a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design to examine the effects of different levels of daily carbohydrate availability during a pre-season training microcycle in professional male football players.

The study was conducted in an applied professional football environment during two consecutive pre-season training weeks. Each participant completed both dietary conditions. The order of the two conditions was randomized and counterbalanced. The training schedule and overall training content were matched between the two intervention weeks as part of the club's regular training program.

The two dietary conditions were designed to provide different daily carbohydrate intakes. In both conditions, participants followed a standardized food-based diet that provided 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. In the higher-carbohydrate condition, participants also consumed three carbohydrate-containing study beverages per day, providing an additional 3 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. This resulted in a total target intake of 7 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. In the moderate-carbohydrate condition, participants consumed similar placebo beverages without added carbohydrate, resulting in a total target intake of 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.

The study beverages were prepared from water and an artificially sweetened concentrate. In the higher-carbohydrate condition, maltodextrin was added to the beverage. In the moderate-carbohydrate condition, no maltodextrin was added. Beverages were provided in non-transparent bottles to support participant blinding. Participants were not informed of the carbohydrate content of the study beverages.

Dietary targets were individualized according to body mass. Breakfast and snacks were individualized according to participant preferences but standardized for carbohydrate content. Lunch was provided through the club's restaurant and adjusted to meet the carbohydrate target. Dinner targets were communicated using an image-based portion guide to support consistent carbohydrate intake outside the training facility. Participants were instructed to maintain their habitual protein and fat intake across both conditions.

Adherence to supervised meals and beverages at the training facility was monitored by study staff. Evening beverages were distributed for home consumption and returned the following morning so that remaining contents could be inspected. Dietary intake outside the training facility was not fully controlled.

External training load was monitored during football training sessions using a global positioning system device worn by each participant. The same device was used by each participant throughout the study to reduce measurement variation. The training monitoring system was used to quantify running and movement demands during the intervention period.

Neuromuscular function was assessed using countermovement jump testing on repeated occasions during the two training weeks. Self-reported measures were collected to assess perceived exertion after training, perceived recovery before training, and daily readiness upon waking.

The study was designed to compare the two carbohydrate conditions within the same participants while preserving the normal structure of a professional football training environment. This design allowed the researchers to examine whether changing carbohydrate availability during regular team training influenced training-related performance and recovery measures under applied conditions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gothenburg, Sweden, 40530
        • Center for Health and Performance, Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Professional male football player
  • Outfield player
  • Member of the recruited professional football team
  • Available to take part in the pre-season training period
  • Able to follow the study diet and beverage protocol
  • Able to wear a global positioning system device during training
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Goalkeeper
  • Injured at the start of the study period
  • Expected to leave the team on loan during the study period
  • Unable to complete both dietary conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High-Carbohydrate First Sequence
Participants completed the high-carbohydrate condition during the first pre-season training week, followed by the moderate-carbohydrate condition during the second pre-season training week.
Participants consumed three daily maltodextrin-containing beverages in addition to a standardized food-based diet providing 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. The beverages provided an additional 3 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day, resulting in a total target intake of 7 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.
Other Names:
  • H-CHO
  • High-carbohydrate condition
  • High carbohydrate availability
Participants consumed three daily placebo beverages without added carbohydrate in addition to the same standardized food-based diet providing 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. The total target intake was 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.
Other Names:
  • M-CHO
  • Moderate-carbohydrate condition
  • Placebo beverage condition
Experimental: Moderate-Carbohydrate First Sequence
Participants completed the moderate-carbohydrate condition during the first pre-season training week, followed by the high-carbohydrate condition during the second pre-season training week.
Participants consumed three daily maltodextrin-containing beverages in addition to a standardized food-based diet providing 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. The beverages provided an additional 3 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day, resulting in a total target intake of 7 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.
Other Names:
  • H-CHO
  • High-carbohydrate condition
  • High carbohydrate availability
Participants consumed three daily placebo beverages without added carbohydrate in addition to the same standardized food-based diet providing 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. The total target intake was 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.
Other Names:
  • M-CHO
  • Moderate-carbohydrate condition
  • Placebo beverage condition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
High-Speed Running Distance
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Distance covered at speeds >19.8 km·h-¹ during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of Sprints
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of sprint efforts performed during football training sessions, measured using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Sprint Distance
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Distance covered at speeds >25.2 km·h-¹ during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Distance Covered
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Total distance covered during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
High Metabolic Load Distance
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Distance covered at high metabolic load >25 W·kg-¹ during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Acceleration Distance
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Distance covered during accelerations >3 m·s-² during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of Accelerations
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of acceleration events >3 m·s-² during football training sessions, measured using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Deceleration Distance
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Distance covered during decelerations <-3 m·s-² during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of Decelerations
Time Frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of deceleration events <-3 m·s-² during football training sessions, measured using a global positioning system device.
During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Countermovement Jump Height
Time Frame: Three times during each 1-week intervention period: baseline, mid-week, and end-week
Countermovement jump height, measured in centimeters using [force platform Hawkin Dynamics, Gen 5, USA].
Three times during each 1-week intervention period: baseline, mid-week, and end-week
Session Rating of Perceived Exertion
Time Frame: After each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Rating of perceived exertion after each football training session, measured using the Borg CR10 scale.
After each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Perceived Recovery
Time Frame: Before each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Perceived recovery assessed before football training sessions using single-item 0 to 10 scale, where 0 indicates complete exhaustion and 10 full recovery
Before each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Perceived Readiness
Time Frame: Daily upon waking during each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Perceived readiness assessed using Hooper Index.
Daily upon waking during each of the two 1-week intervention periods

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Pettersson, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, Göteborgs universitet, Gothenburg, Sweden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Göteborg University

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to the small sample size and the specific professional team context. These factors may increase the risk of participant identification, even after de-identification of the data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carbohydrate Intake and Exercise Performance

Clinical Trials on High-Carbohydrate Beverage

3
Subscribe