- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07676110
The Impact of Enhanced Music & Natural Visuals on Emotional Health
Impacts of Music, Audio Enhancements, Audio Guidance, and Visuals on Physical and Emotional Well-being. (Emotional Health - Longitudinal 1 Randomized, Controlled Multi-center Study)
The investigators are conducting research on factors related to the self-regulation of mood and arousal states across a range of everyday activities as well as different levels of stress. Behavioral interventions-such as meditation, listening to music, or visualizing art or nature-offer important alternatives and/or adjunctive strategies to pharmaceutical tools or other mechanisms supporting physical and emotional well-being. This research will expand on the knowledge base regarding the impact of biophysical stimulation and/or frame of mind on an individual's self-directed management of physical and emotional health. Motivation, confidence, and composure are critical aspects of self-efficacy, framing a person's mindset to make healthy choices across daily activities.
The research in this protocol is carried out across multiple sites and studies by means of digital tools and a consistent participant experience workflow. Together, these resources are intended to support individuals across multiple self-directed experiences utilized in the maintenance of their basic health. Before, during, and after session experiences, the participant provides objective (physiological) responses and/or subjective (self-report) responses and reflections; some studies also include interviews or focus groups. The combined set of responses can be summarized, connected to other measures, and input to machine learning models to improve personalization of stimuli. By studying the effects of soundBrilliance experiences across a variety of contexts and participant samples, the investigators can better refine each element of the stimulus to improve satisfaction, tolerance, and targeted outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Robert Mele (VP of Clinical Research & Testing Operations), B.Eng
- Phone Number: 1 7752444866
- Email: rob.mele@soundBrilliance.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Justin C Hayes (Manager, Research & Testing Operations), MA
- Phone Number: 515-777-4591
- Email: justin.hayes@soundBrilliance.com
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80523
- Recruiting
- Colorado State University
-
Contact:
- Blythe LaGasse, PhD
- Phone Number: 970-491-4042
- Email: blagasse@colostate.edu
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68178
- Recruiting
- Creighton University
-
Contact:
- Ryan Batenhorst, EdD
- Phone Number: 402-730-6632
- Email: RyanBatenhorst@creighton.edu
-
Contact:
- Thomas L Lenz, PharmD
- Phone Number: 402-280-3144
- Email: ThomasLenz@creighton.edu
-
-
Nevada
-
Reno, Nevada, United States, 89511
- Recruiting
- Reno Running Company
-
Contact:
- Anna Costello
- Phone Number: 775-303-5845
- Email: Anna.Costello@WashoeSchools.net
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- You are 13 years of age or older
- You can read, write, and speak English at a 5th-grade level or higher
- You are legally capable of providing informed consent (adult participants) or capable of providing assent (child participants)
- To the best of your knowledge, you are willing and able to commit to the session(s) and activities of this study
- You are willing and able to use the sound-delivery and data-collection apparatus of this study
- You are willing to use your own personal equipment. Depending on the study, you may need to have your own ear buds/headphones and/or a "smart" device with internet and/or Bluetooth access (e.g., smartphone, iPad).
- You have normal hearing in both ears.
- You never experience ringing noises or buzzing sensations in your ears (tinnitus)
- You do not use a heart/cardiac pacemaker and do not have any history of cardiac rhythm disturbances, such as cardiac conduction delays or blocks
- You have no known history of fainting, fainting, spells or seizures, spinning sensations, or trouble with balance (medical terms include epilepsy, seizures, syncope, vertigo, nystagmus)
- You do not use of any of the following medications: Beta blockers, steroids, ephedrine, acute anti-anxiety medication (e.g., benzodiazepines such as diazepam/Valium, lorazepam/Ativan or clonazepam/Klonopin), or acute or chronic pain medications (including narcotics and codeine)
- For any study session, you will not be under the influence of any substances that could prevent safe participation and will not have consumed e.g., alcohol, THC, Psilocybin, or other mood-altering drugs in the 12 hours preceding the session.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A - Intervention
Group A will be given access to the intervention (use of the soundBrillinace app) for 12 weeks
|
Use of the soundBrilliance app (enhanced music, natural visuals, spoken guidance) over 12 weeks, targeting use of 4 days or more per week.
|
|
No Intervention: Group B
Group B will receive no intervention (behavior as usual) for 12 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in State Trait Anxiety Inventory - State (STAI-S) between treatment vs control groups.
Time Frame: Baseline and at 2-week intervals over the duration of 12-week protocol (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
The 20 item STAI-S, a self-report survey reflecting current symptoms of anxiety, will be given to both groups at baseline and at 2-week intervals through the duration of the 12-week protocol.
The difference in group mean change of STAI-S from baseline across 2-week milestones will be estimated.
|
Baseline and at 2-week intervals over the duration of 12-week protocol (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (8 question; PHQ-8) between treatment vs control groups.
Time Frame: Baseline and at 2-week intervals over the duration of the 12-week protocol (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12-week post-baseline).
|
The 8 item PHQ-8, a self-report survey reflecting current symptoms of depression, will be given to both groups at baseline and at 20week intervals through the duration of the 12-week protocol.
The difference in group mean change of PHQ-8 from baseline across 2-week milestones will be estimated.
|
Baseline and at 2-week intervals over the duration of the 12-week protocol (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12-week post-baseline).
|
|
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (20 item; PANAS-SF) between treatment vs control groups.
Time Frame: Baseline and at 2-week intervals over the duration of 12-week protocol (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
The 20 item PANAS-SF will be given to both groups at baseline and at 2-week intervals through the duration of the 12-week protocol.
The difference in group mean change of positive and negative affect scores from baseline across 2-week milestones will be estimated.
|
Baseline and at 2-week intervals over the duration of 12-week protocol (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Perceived Stress (PSS - 10 item) between treatment vs control groups.
Time Frame: Baseline and at week 12 (0, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
The 10 item PSS will be given to both groups at baseline and at 12-week protocol completion.
The difference in group mean change of STAI-S from baseline across 2-week milestones will be estimated.
|
Baseline and at week 12 (0, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (Cantril's Ladder) between treatment vs control groups.
Time Frame: Baseline and at week 12 (0, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
Cantril's Ladder, a quality of life (QoL) measure, will be given to both groups at baseline and at the conclusion of the 12-week protocol (week 12).
The difference in group mean change of QoL from baseline to post-study will be estimated.
|
Baseline and at week 12 (0, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
|
Change in Beck Depression Inventory-II (21 item; BDI-II) between treatment vs control groups.
Time Frame: Baseline and at 2-week intervals over the duration of 12-week protocol (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
The 21 item BDI-II will be given to participants in a cohort supervised by a clinical sub-investigator providing ongoing care.
The BDI-II will be given to both groups at baseline and at 2-week intervals through the duration of the 12-week protocol.
The difference in group mean change of composite scores from baseline across 2-week milestones will be estimated.
|
Baseline and at 2-week intervals over the duration of 12-week protocol (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks post-baseline).
|
|
Planned Sub-group Analysis of Age
Time Frame: Baseline throughout the 12 week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
We will do subgroup analysis with contrasts by age in years, for groups 13-17, 18-29, 30-49, 50+
|
Baseline throughout the 12 week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
|
Planned Sub-group Analysis of Sex
Time Frame: Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
We will do subgroup analysis with contrasts by sex for groups male versus female.
|
Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
|
Planned Sub-group Analysis of baseline scores of PSS
Time Frame: Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
We will do subgroup analysis with contrasts by PSS (Perceived Stress Scale survey) baseline score for groups categorized into Low, Moderate, and High perceived stress.
|
Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
|
Planned Sub-group Analysis of baseline scores of STAI-Trait Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
We will do subgroup analysis with contrasts by STAI-Trait Anxiety baseline score for groups categorized into Low or No, Moderate, and High perceived anxiety and combinations thereof such as Low or No versus Moderate and High.
|
Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
|
Planned Sub-group Analysis of baseline scores of Cantril's Ladder
Time Frame: Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
We will do subgroup analysis with contrasts by Cantril's Ladder for the linear relationship between predictor and outcome.
|
Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
|
Planned Sub-group Analysis of baseline scores of MAIA
Time Frame: Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
We will do subgroup analysis with contrasts by MAIA (Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness survey) baseline score for groups categorized into Low (below 25th percentile), Average (25th to 75th percentile) and High (above 75th percentile) and combinations thereof such as Low versus Average and High.
|
Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
|
Planned Sub-group Analysis of baseline scores of MAAS
Time Frame: Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
We will do subgroup analysis with contrasts by MAAS (Mindful Attention Awareness Scale survey) for the linear relationship between predictor and outcome.
|
Baseline throughout the 12-week protocol. (0, 2, ... 12 weeks).
|
|
Summarization of subjective Tolerance of stimuli
Time Frame: Tolerance data collected at completion of sessions, over the duration of 12-week protocol.
|
Subjects have the option to report subjective tolerance of stimuli on a per-session basis.
These data will be reported using descriptive statistics such as counts (n's) and percentages of reports as well as summarized free-text responses.
|
Tolerance data collected at completion of sessions, over the duration of 12-week protocol.
|
|
Summarization of subjective Satisfaction with stimuli
Time Frame: Satisfaction data collected at completion of sessions, over the duration of 12-week protocol.
|
Subjects have the option to report their satisfaction with stimuli on a per-session basis.
These data will be reported using descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation of 6-point Likert scale responses as well as summarized free-text responses.
|
Satisfaction data collected at completion of sessions, over the duration of 12-week protocol.
|
|
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (20 item; PANAS-SF) from baseline pre and post session.
Time Frame: Pre and post stimuli for each treatment session over the duration of 12-week protocol
|
The 20 item PANAS-SF, a self-report survey, will be an optional measure for the treatment group for each session pre and post stimuli through the duration of the 12-week protocol.
The change in scores from baseline to post session will be assessed over time.
|
Pre and post stimuli for each treatment session over the duration of 12-week protocol
|
|
Change in State Trait Anxiety Inventory - State (6 item; STAI-S) from baseline pre and post session.
Time Frame: Pre and post stimuli for each treatment session over the duration of 12-week protocol.
|
The 6-item STAI-S, a self-report survey reflecting current symptoms of anxiety, will be an optional measure for the treatment group for each session pre and post stimuli through the duration of the 12-week protocol.
The change in scores from baseline to post session will be assessed over time.
|
Pre and post stimuli for each treatment session over the duration of 12-week protocol.
|
|
Change in Modified Russel Circumplex (2 item; MRC Arousal & Valence axis)
Time Frame: Pre and post stimuli for each treatment session over the duration of 12-week protocol
|
The 2-item MRC, a self-report survey reflecting Arousal level (9-point Likert from Low Energy to High Energy) and Valence (9-point Likert from Unpleasant to Pleasant), will be an optional measure for the treatment group for each session pre and post stimuli through the duration of the 12-week protocol.
The change in ratings from baseline to post session will be assessed over time.
|
Pre and post stimuli for each treatment session over the duration of 12-week protocol
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Heart Rate Variability (Root Mean Square Successive Differences; RMSSD) between pre to post session in treatment group.
Time Frame: Continuous measurement throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol.
|
A commercial-grade ECG device will be used to measure continuous heart rate throughout the duration of each study session.
RMSSD will be measured before and after each session, for the purposes of estimating average pre-post change (delta) in treatment groups.
|
Continuous measurement throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol.
|
|
Change in Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) activation between pre to post session in treatment group.
Time Frame: Continuous measurement throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol.
|
A commercial-grade ECG device will be used to measure continuous heart rate throughout the duration of each study session.
SNS will be measured before and after each session, for the purposes of estimating average pre-post change (delta) in treatment groups.
|
Continuous measurement throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol.
|
|
Change in Parasympathetic Nervous System (PNS) activation between pre to post session in treatment group.
Time Frame: Continuous measurement throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol
|
A commercial-grade ECG device will be used to measure continuous heart rate throughout the duration of each study session.
PNS will be measured before and after each session, for the purposes of estimating average pre-post change (delta) in treatment groups.
|
Continuous measurement throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol
|
|
Change in Stress Index between pre to post session in treatment group.
Time Frame: Continuous measurement throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol.
|
A commercial-grade ECG device will be used to measure continuous heart rate throughout the duration of each study session.
Stress Index (SI) will be measured before and after each session, for the purposes of estimating average pre-post change (delta) in treatment groups.
|
Continuous measurement throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol.
|
|
Beneficial change in both physiological and psychometric outcomes
Time Frame: Pre-post change measurements throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol.
|
For the outcomes that have both categorical and continuous interpretations.
Changes from categorical baseline conditions will be tested using McNemar's Test (Shift Table).
|
Pre-post change measurements throughout study sessions for all sessions completed during the 12-week protocol.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jason S Doescher, MD, soundBrilliance LLC
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;64(2):258-66. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008.
- Taylor JM. Psychometric analysis of the Ten-Item Perceived Stress Scale. Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar;27(1):90-101. doi: 10.1037/a0038100. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
- Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227-242.
- Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(3):301-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x.
- Mohammed SEE, Warner G. The Cantril Ladder as a Measure of Well-Being and Life Satisfaction Among Refugee Youth Experiencing Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress. J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Jun;26(3):539-545. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01563-5. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
- Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SBEMHL001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sleep
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonPhilips HealthcareCompletedSleep, Slow-wave Sleep, Sleep Enhancement, Sleep Optimization
-
Brain Electrophysiology Laboratory CompanyRecruiting
-
Mahidol UniversityRamathibodi HospitalNot yet recruitingSleep Inertia | Sleep, Slow-wave Sleep, Sleep Enhancement, Sleep Optimization | Night Shift WorkThailand
-
University GhentEuropean CommissionCompleted
-
Northumbria UniversityCompletedSleep | Mood | Poor Quality Sleep | Good Sleep HabitUnited Kingdom
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoEnrolling by invitationSleep | Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)Brazil
-
Atlas UniversityCompletedSleep | Surgery | Sleep QualityTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Mersin UniversityCompletedSleep Quality | Sleep PerceptionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalNot yet recruitingObstructive Sleep Apnea | Sleep-disordered BreathingUnited States
-
Institute of Nutrition, Slovenia (Nutris)Valens Int. d.o.o., Slovenija; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingSleep Quality | Sleep Onset LatencySlovenia
Clinical Trials on soundBrilliance software application - Emotional Health
-
Oui Therapeutics, LLCCompletedSuicidal Ideation | Suicide, AttemptedUnited States
-
Adai Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted
-
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de SalamancaRecruitingMyocardial Ischemia | Coronary Artery Disease | AtherosclerosisNetherlands, France, Spain
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeEgypt
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaThrasher Research FundCompleted
-
Optain HealthGlobal BioClinicalCompletedDiabetes | Diabetic RetinopathyUnited States
-
Verily Life Sciences LLCThe Emmes Company, LLC; Optos, PLC; Google LLC.; Nikon CorporationCompleted
-
University of Mogi das CruzesCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.; Instituto Federal...Completed
-
Prasanth PattisapuClinical and Translational Intramural Funding Program from the Abigail Wexner...Enrolling by invitationHearing Loss | Deafness | Speech Therapy | Literacy | Hearing Impaired Children | Speech Disorders in Children | Hearing Disorders in ChildrenUnited States