- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07684313
TRIFORMIS RESILIA Real-world Study Assessing Safety and Performance (TRIBLAZE Study) (TRIBLAZE)
Multi-center, Single-arm, Observational Study Assessing Real-world Safety and Performance of the TRIFORMIS RESILIA Tricuspid Valve for Surgical Tricuspid Valve Replacement (TRIBLAZE Study)
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Aya Westbrook, PhD
- Phone Number: 949-250-2500
- Email: Aya_Westbrook@edwards.com
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46260
- Ascension St. Vincent's Hospital
-
Principal Investigator:
- David Heimansohn, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- Indication for TRIFORMIS valve implant for native or prosthetic valve dysfunction
- Provide written informed consent prior to the 30-day imaging follow-up
- Willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
• Untreatable hypersensitivity to nitinol alloys (nickel and titanium)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Edwards TRIFORMIS RESILIA heart valve
Subjects who were treated with the Edwards TRIFORMIS RESILIA heart valve
|
Surgical replacement of the tricuspid valve with the Edwards TRIFORMIS RESILIA heart valve
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant's average mean gradient measurement over time
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the tricuspid valve measured in millimeters of mercury.
Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher value is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 Year
|
|
Participant's average peak gradient measurement over time
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the tricuspid valve as measured in millimeters of mercury.
Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher valve is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 Year
|
|
Participant's average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) measurement over time
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the tricuspid valve.
Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 Year
|
|
Participant's amount of tricuspid valvular regurgitation measurement over time
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Valvular regurgitation occurs when the valve in the heart does not close tightly, allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it.
Valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation, 1 = a trace of regurgitation, 2 = mild regurgitation, 3 = moderate regurgitation, and 4 represents severe regurgitation.
Higher numbers on the scale show a worsening outcome.
|
1 Year
|
|
Participant's right ventricular function over time
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Right ventricular function is the heart's ability to pump deoxygenated blood through the pulmonary circulation into the lungs.
Right ventricular function is assessed via echocardiography.
It is assessed on a scale of: Normal, Mild dysfunction, Moderate dysfunction, Moderate-severe dysfunction, or Severe dysfunction.
|
1 Year
|
|
Participant's amount of paravalvular leak over time
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Paravalvular leak refers to blood flowing through a channel between the implanted artificial valve and the cardiac tissue as a result of inappropriate sealing.
Paravalvular leak is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
It is assessed on a scale from minimum of 0 to maximum of 4, where 0 = no leak, 1 = a trace leak, 2 = a mild leak, 3 = a moderate leak, and 4 = a severe leak.
Higher numbers on the scale show a worsening outcome.
|
1 Year
|
|
Participant's quality of life improvement as measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire from baseline to 1 year
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Year
|
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a validated, disease-specific health status tool for patients with heart failure.
It measures symptoms, physical and social limitations, and quality of life over the previous two weeks.
Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher numbers indicate better health and fewer symptoms and lower numbers indicate wore health and more symptoms.
|
Baseline and 1 Year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant's functional improvement over time from baseline for New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
The New York Heart Association functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Class III. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Class IV. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. |
Baseline, 1 month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from all cause mortality
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from all cause mortality.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from cardiovascular mortality.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from valve-related mortality
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related mortality.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from tricuspid valve reintervention
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from a reoperation on their tricuspid valve.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from valve-related pulmonary embolism
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related pulmonary embolism.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from valve-related valve thrombosis
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related valve thrombosis.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from valve-related hemorrhage
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related hemorrhage.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from valve-related endocarditis
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related endocarditis.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from tricuspid valve-related heart failure hospitalization
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from tricuspid valve-related heart failure hospitalization.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025-14
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Diseases
-
Baker Heart and Diabetes InstitutePrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Royal Perth Hospital; Alice... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHeart Failure | Valve Heart DiseaseAustralia
-
Nantes University HospitalDirectorate of Health Care SupplyRecruitingHeart Diseases | Heart Failure | Heart Valve DiseasesFrance
-
Centre Chirurgical Marie LannelongueActive, not recruitingValvular Heart Disease | Valve Disease, Heart
-
Umeå UniversityRegion NorrbottenNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureSweden
-
National Defense Medical Center, TaiwanRecruiting
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Heart Failure | Valvular Heart Disease | Biochemical DysfunctionGreece
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalCompletedElectrocardiogram, Valvular Heart DiseaseChina, United Kingdom
-
Medical University of ViennaUnknownHeart Diseases | Heart Failure | Valvular Heart DiseaseAustria
-
Abiomed Inc.CompletedHeart Diseases | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure | Acute Heart FailureUnited States
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Edwards TRIFORMIS RESILIA heart valve
-
Edwards LifesciencesRecruitingAortic Valve DiseaseGermany
-
Edwards LifesciencesChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital; Rundo International Pharmaceutical... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterRecruitingAortic Valve StenosisUnited States
-
The Society of Thoracic SurgeonsAmerican College of CardiologyCompletedSevere Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
-
Edwards LifesciencesNot yet recruitingAortic Valve DiseaseGermany
-
Sorin Group USA, Inc.TerminatedAortic Valve DiseaseUnited States, Canada
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAortic Valve DiseaseUnited Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Canada
-
Edwards LifesciencesUniversity of British Columbia; Medstar Health Research Institute; European Cardiovascular...CompletedAortic Valve DiseaseAustralia, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, France, New Zealand, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Edwards LifesciencesUniversity of British Columbia; Medstar Health Research Institute; European Cardiovascular...CompletedAortic Valve DiseaseSwitzerland, Germany
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed