Alterations in Spiking Following Muscle Fatigue in Volleyball Players

Alterations in Spiking Kinematic, Muscle Activation, and Subacromial Structures Following Muscle Fatigue in Volleyball Players

This study aims (1)to investigate the effects of repetitive functional overhead movements targeting shoulder and scapular muscles on glenohumeral and scapular kinematics and muscle activation during the arm cocking and acceleration of spiking, and changes in subacromial structures in healthy recreational volleyball players; (2) to compare these fatigue-related changes between athletes with good and poor shoulder motor control.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
        • Contact:
          • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
          • Phone Number: (02)2826-7049
          • Email: tshuang@nycu.edu.tw

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy recreational volleyball players

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18 and 35 years old
  • At least 2 consecutive years of volleyball experience
  • Involved in volleyball practice or game for at least 4 hours per week
  • Able to perform a cross-body spike with 3-step

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of major shoulder or spinal injury or surgery
  • Experiencing shoulder pain (VAS ≥ 3/10) in the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Poor shoulder motor control
During shoulder medial rotation up to 60° in supine position, the scapula forward tilts or elevation occurs, difficulties in breathing, performing difficulties, unable to perform 60° medial rotation, glenohumeral anterior translation, fatigue, the need of external feedback and external support.

The subject performed upper extremity D2 diagonal exercise with Thera-band at kneeling position to simulate the arm movement of a volleyball spike. The movement is paced by a metronome at one beat per second, with one movement per beat. If participants could not keep up or become too fatigued, they are allowed to rest for 15 seconds before continuing.

The subject was defined as fatigued, and the fatigue activity was stopped, only when all three of the following cumulative conditions were met:

  1. Until the number of repetitions in that set was less than 50% of the repetitions performed in the first set.
  2. Using the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) on a 6-20 scale, until the subject's RPE was greater than or equal to 15.
  3. If this maximum strength showed a decrease of 25% or more compared to the maximum strength measured before the fatigue activity.
Good shoulder motor control
During shoulder medial rotation up to 60° in supine position, no scapula and glenohumeral compensation, easy to breathing and perform 60° medial rotation without external feedback and external support.

The subject performed upper extremity D2 diagonal exercise with Thera-band at kneeling position to simulate the arm movement of a volleyball spike. The movement is paced by a metronome at one beat per second, with one movement per beat. If participants could not keep up or become too fatigued, they are allowed to rest for 15 seconds before continuing.

The subject was defined as fatigued, and the fatigue activity was stopped, only when all three of the following cumulative conditions were met:

  1. Until the number of repetitions in that set was less than 50% of the repetitions performed in the first set.
  2. Using the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) on a 6-20 scale, until the subject's RPE was greater than or equal to 15.
  3. If this maximum strength showed a decrease of 25% or more compared to the maximum strength measured before the fatigue activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joint during spiking
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

The kinematics is assessed using an electromagnetic motion tracking system (VIPERTM, Polhemus, USA) to measure the glenohumeral elevation, horizontal abduction/adduction, internal/external rotation, and scapulothoracic retraction/protraction, upward/downward rotation, anterior/posterior tilt during spiking movement. During the test, participants performed 3 times of cross-body spikes, with 15 seconds of rest between each trial.

Data were collected at the end of the arm cocking (maximal shoulder horizontal abduction) and at ball-contact (maximal footswitch signal), and reported as mean values for each trial. (unit of measure: degree, °)

Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
Activation amplitude of the glenohumeral and periscapular muscles
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

The muscle activation amplitude of the serratus anterior, upper trapezius, lower trapezius, middle deltoid, infraspinatus, and pectoralis major during spiking movement. During the test, participants performed 3 times of cross-body spikes, with 15 seconds of rest between each trial.

Data were collected in the arm cocking phase (from minimal shoulder elevation to the shoulder maximal horizontal abduction) and the acceleration phase (from maximal shoulder horizontal abduction to the ball-contact), and reported as mean values for each trial. (unit of measure: percentage, %)

Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
Mean power frequency of the glenohumeral and periscapular muscles
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

The mean power frequency of the serratus anterior, upper trapezius, lower trapezius, middle deltoid, infraspinatus, and pectoralis major during spiking movement. During the test, participants performed 3 times of cross-body spikes, with 15 seconds of rest between each trial.

Data were collected in the arm cocking phase (from minimal shoulder elevation to the shoulder maximal horizontal abduction) and the acceleration phase (from maximal shoulder horizontal abduction to the ball-contact), and reported as mean values for each trial. (unit of measure: hertz, Hz)

Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acromio-humeral distance and thickness of supraspinatus tendon thickness during arm elevation
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

The subacromial structures is assessed using a diagnostic ultrasound system (SONIMAGE MX1 Ver. 1.10, Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to measure the acromio-humeral distance (AHD, from the lateral inferior edge of the acromion perpendicular to the humerus), supraspinatus tendon thickness (SST, from the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa perpendicular to the humerus), occupation ratio (OR, dividing SST by AHD). During the dynamic evaluation, participants performed 3 times of arm elevation to 90° and returning to the neutral position at scapular plane. During the static evaluation, participants performed 3 times of arm elevation to 60° at scapular plane.

Data of dynamic evaluation is collected at 0° elevation and at the greater tuberosity of the humerus is aligned under the lateral inferior edge of the acromion. Data of static evaluation is collected at 0° elevation and 60° elevation. Data reported as mean values for each trial. (unit of measure: millimeter, mm)

Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
Degree of shoulder elevation at greater tuberosity-acromion alignment during arm elevation
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
The shoulder elevation angle is measured using a application software (Measure, Apple Inc., USA) at at greater tuberosity of humerus under Lateral inferior edge of the acromion, which assess diagnostic ultrasound system (SONIMAGE MX1 Ver. 1.10, Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and reported as mean values for each trial. (unit of measure: degree, °).
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NYCU114118AF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Clinical Trials on Upper Extremity Muscle Fatigue Protocol

3
Subscribe