- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07688590
Comparison of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressures of SaCo Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and ProSeal LMA in Adult Elective Surgery
June 30, 2026 updated by: Mehmet Emin Keskin, Yuzuncu Yil University
Van Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee
To compare of oropharyngeal leak pressures of SaCo video laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and ProSeal LMA in adult elective surgery
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study will be conducted after obtaining an approval from the local ethics committee.
The study will include 180 patients aged 18-65 years with ASA scores I-II, mallampati scores I-II, scheduled for surgery in the supine position in the general surgery, gynecology and obstetrics, urology and orthopedics departments with a planned surgery duration not exceeding 90 minutes.
The patients will be randomized by sealed tender and will be divided into 2 groups with 90 patients each.
All cases will receive routine preparation for general anesthesia.
For anesthesia induction 2 mcg/kg fentanyl, 2 mg/kg propofol and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will be used.
Once sufficient anesthesia depth is achieved, the patient will be prepared to receive either a SaCo video LMA or ProSeal LMA of the appropriate size, according to a randomly assigned group.
The successful placement of the LMA on the first attempt, the placement duration and the oropharyngeal leak pressure will be evaluated.
Successful placement will be assessed by observing a continuous trace of end tidal CO2 after LMA placement.
The placement duration will begin with the practitioner holding the patient's head with their left hand and holding the LMA in their right hand.
Following successful LMA placement, the cuff will be inflated using a manual cuff pressure gauge until the cuff pressure reaches 60 cm H2O and the pressure valve will be slowly closed, with the values indicating leak pressure being noted.
Anesthesia will be maintained with 60% air, 40% oxygen and 1 MAC sevoflurane.
If intraoperatively needed, an additional dose of 0,5 mcg/kg fentanyl and 0,15 mg/kg rocuronium will be administered.
Before the end of the surgery, 15 mg/kg paracetamol and 1 mg/kg tramadol will be administered for postoperative analgesia.
4 mg/kg sugammadex will be administered as a muscle relaxant reversal agent.
The LMA will be removed when the patient starts breathing spontaneously and opens their eyes in response to verbal stimulation.
All data will be recorded and statistical analysis will be made.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
180
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Tusba
-
Van, Tusba, Turkey (Türkiye), 65100
- Van Yuzuncu Yil University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled for electvie surgery in the general surgery, gynecology and obstetrics, urology and orthopedics departments
- Between 18-65 years
- ASA I-II group
- Mallampati scores I-II
- Patients who will undergo surgery in the supine position
- Surgeries with a planned duration of no more than 90 minutes.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those who are outside the age range of 18-65
- Those who are ASA III and above
- Those who are Mallampati score III-IV
- Patients scheduled for emergency surgery
- Those whose condition prevents LMA implantation
- those who have had an upper respiratory tract infection in the last 4 weeks
- those with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m²
- those scheduled for laparoscopic surgery
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: ProSeal LMA (Group-P)
Group-P: ProSeal LMA group (n:90).
in adult patients scheduled for surgery, airway patency will be maintained with a ProSeal LMA
|
Group-P: ProSeal LMA group (n:90).
in adult patients scheduled for surgery, airway patency will be maintained with a ProSeal LMA
|
|
Experimental: SaCo Video LMA (Group-V)
Group-V: SaCo Video LMA group (n:90).
in adult patients scheduled for surgery, airway patency will be maintained with a SaCo LMA
|
Group-V: SaCo Video LMA group (n:90).
in adult patients scheduled for surgery, airway patency will be maintained with a SaCo LMA
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
The oropharengeal leak pressure will be evaluated by same anaesthetist after LMA placement
|
Periprocedural
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful placement of the LMA on the first attempt
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
Successful placement will be assessed by observing a continuous trace of end tidal CO2 after LMA placement
|
Periprocedural
|
|
placement duration
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
The placement duration will begin with the practitioner holding the patient's head with their left hand and holding the LMA in their right hand
|
Periprocedural
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Şükran Sevimli, Assoc. Prof., Yuzuncu Yil University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, Chung F. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):602-7. doi: 10.1097/eja.0b013e32833679e3.
- Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 May;31(5):266-73. doi: 10.1097/01.EJA.0000435015.89651.3d.
- Ozden GG, Dost B, Kaya C, Turunc E, Koksal E, Ustun YB, Bilgin S, Baris S. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the SaCoVLM video laryngeal mask and LMA supreme in adult elective surgery patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03218-4.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 30, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
July 7, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 7, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 30, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026/01-06
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Study protocol anda statistical analysis plan will be share with other researchers
IPD Sharing Time Frame
1 year
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The access can be provided via the e-mail addresses below emin6559@hotmail.com
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Oropharengeal Leak Pressure
-
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical...RecruitingOropharyngeal Leak PressureChina
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknownOropharyngeal Leak PressureTaiwan
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedIntubation, Endotracheal | Leak PressureUnited States
-
Medical University InnsbruckCompletedOropharyngeal Leak PressureAustria
-
University of MalayaCompletedGeneral Anaesthesia | Supraglottic Airway | Elective Surgery | Oropharyngeal Leak PressureMalaysia
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical...RecruitingRandomized Controlled Trial | Elderly (People Aged 65 or More) | Cuff Pressure | Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure | Pharyngolaryngeal Postoperative Pain | Laryngeal Mask Airways | LMAChina
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneCompletedEvaluation of Success Rate | Airway Leak Pressure | Side Effects of LMA Supreme in Pediatric Patients Undergoing General AnesthesiaSwitzerland
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompletedthe Influence of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Mask and Vocal Cord During Changing Patient's Head and Neck PositionTaiwan
-
Charles University, Czech RepublicRecruitingCSF Pressure Increased | CSF Leak | Puncture | CSF Circulation DisorderCzechia
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompletedProlonged Air Leak | Postoperative Air LeakSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on ProSeal LMA Group (Group-P)
-
Prince of Songkla UniversityUnknownInadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or VentilationThailand
-
Medical University InnsbruckCompleted
-
University of MalayaCompletedA Randomized Comparison of LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) Supreme and LMA Proseal in Infants Below 10kgLaryngeal Mask AirwayMalaysia
-
Medical University InnsbruckCompletedVentilation | Difficult AirwayAustria
-
Dr.Mahak MehtaCompletedProseal LMA vs Air-Q LMA vs Ambu AurGain LMA
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompletedOropharyngeal InjuryKorea, Republic of
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompletedthe Influence of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Mask and Vocal Cord During Changing Patient's Head and Neck PositionTaiwan
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedAirway Complication of AnaesthesiaTurkey
-
Medical University InnsbruckCompleted
-
National University of MalaysiaUnknownEvaluation of Optimal Operating Table Height for Successful Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask AirwayMalaysia