The Influence of Head and Neck Position About Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Laryngeal Mask and Vocal Cord Using Different Types of Supraglottic Airway Device

November 11, 2015 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital
Generally, the laryngeal mask airway is not considered in the surgery which should be changing position in the perioperative period. The shape of the pharynx changes during the head and neck movement and there is probably also a change in the force transmitted to the cuff along the airway tube. Besides, there is evidence that supraglottic airway device can be displaced with rotation. In this article, the investigators want to discuss about that oropharyngeal leak pressure and sealing between the mask and vocal cord while changing head and neck position in perioperative period using different types of supraglottic airway device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators select adult patients,who are 20-80yrs old and ASA physical status I or II, receiving minor surgery, ex: breast surgery or cystoscope, participated in this randomized cross-over trial. Patients were excluded if they were in the above condition. The patient is at high risk of aspiration, ex:obesity, pregnancy upper GI bleeding or not enough fasting time. The patient could not open mouth or upper airway obstruction. The patient receive major surgery, ex: heart, brain, lung, liver, kidney surgery. The patient has abnormal heart and lung function.

The patient received different types of supraglottic airway device like proseal LMA,ambu LMA, air Q LMA or igel LMA by draw, then the patients will be divided into different groups.In the preoperative period, the investigators documented oropharyngeal leak pressure in these selected positions: neutral position( 0 degree),and rotation 15, 30,45, 60 degrees, etc. However, oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at fixed O2 flow 3L/min and 20 cm H2O. If the ambu bag is flattening, the investigators will think the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord. Then the investigators use fiberscope to observe the condition between the epiglottis and the laryngeal mask.

The investigators wanted to compared the mean leak pressure at different head and neck rotation position,ex:neutral,30,45,60 degrees,by using many different types of supraglottic airway device.

The observers define the relationship between epiglottis and vocal cord to describe the condition when the patient is at different degree of head and neck position. Grade I is vocal cord completely visible. Grade IIA is only partially vocal cord visible and epiglottis noted. Grade IIB is no vocal cord visible and only epiglottis noted. Grade III is other condition, ex:trapped epiglottis or no epiglottis visible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Department of anesthesiology,National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • 20-80 yrs old and ASA physical status I or II,
  • Receiving minor surgery, ex: breast surgery or cystoscope

Exclusion criteria:

  • The patient is at high risk of aspiration, ex:obesity, pregnancy upper GI bleeding or not enough fasting time.
  • The patient could not open mouth or upper airway obstruction
  • The patient receive major surgery, ex: heart, brain, lung, liver, kidney surgery.
  • The patient has abnormal heart and lung function.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: LMA proseal

The investigator will use proseal LMA in this study. The cuff of the proseal LMA could be inflation. It is thought to fix the larynx shape.

The investigator wants to test the efficacy during 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position.

It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region. The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.
EXPERIMENTAL: igel LMA

igel LMA did not have cuff. The shape, softness and contours accurately mirror the perilaryngeal anatomy.

The investigator want to test the efficacy of the igel at 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position.

It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region.
EXPERIMENTAL: air Q LMA

The air-Q LMA should be used routinely as a classic passive airway. It is user-friendly, placement in patients is easy and air movement is outstanding. It has the added benefit of allowing for intubation using standard ET Tubes.

It also has the cuff and the contour of the mask is thought to mimic the the shape of the perilaryngeal region.

The investigator want to test the efficacy of the air Q LMA at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position.

It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region. The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.
EXPERIMENTAL: ambu LMA
ambu LMA is also an cuff device LMA. The investigator wanted to test the efficacy about the leak pressure and the view at 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position.
It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region. The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord
Time Frame: If the ambu bag is flattening during the surgery, the observers check the leak pressure between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord
The oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at fixed O2 flow 3L/min and 20 cm H2O. If the ambu bag is flattening, the observers will think the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and the vocal cord
If the ambu bag is flattening during the surgery, the observers check the leak pressure between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use fiberscope to observe the sealing between the mask and vocal cord while changing head and neck position in perioperative period using different types of supraglottic airway device.
Time Frame: During the surgery
The observer uses the fiberscope to observe the sealing between the vocal cord and epiglottis.
During the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cihmin Liu, anesthesiology department,National Taiwan University hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on LMA proseal

Subscribe