- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01960673
The Influence of Head and Neck Position About Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Laryngeal Mask and Vocal Cord Using Different Types of Supraglottic Airway Device
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The investigators select adult patients,who are 20-80yrs old and ASA physical status I or II, receiving minor surgery, ex: breast surgery or cystoscope, participated in this randomized cross-over trial. Patients were excluded if they were in the above condition. The patient is at high risk of aspiration, ex:obesity, pregnancy upper GI bleeding or not enough fasting time. The patient could not open mouth or upper airway obstruction. The patient receive major surgery, ex: heart, brain, lung, liver, kidney surgery. The patient has abnormal heart and lung function.
The patient received different types of supraglottic airway device like proseal LMA,ambu LMA, air Q LMA or igel LMA by draw, then the patients will be divided into different groups.In the preoperative period, the investigators documented oropharyngeal leak pressure in these selected positions: neutral position( 0 degree),and rotation 15, 30,45, 60 degrees, etc. However, oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at fixed O2 flow 3L/min and 20 cm H2O. If the ambu bag is flattening, the investigators will think the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord. Then the investigators use fiberscope to observe the condition between the epiglottis and the laryngeal mask.
The investigators wanted to compared the mean leak pressure at different head and neck rotation position,ex:neutral,30,45,60 degrees,by using many different types of supraglottic airway device.
The observers define the relationship between epiglottis and vocal cord to describe the condition when the patient is at different degree of head and neck position. Grade I is vocal cord completely visible. Grade IIA is only partially vocal cord visible and epiglottis noted. Grade IIB is no vocal cord visible and only epiglottis noted. Grade III is other condition, ex:trapped epiglottis or no epiglottis visible.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of anesthesiology,National Taiwan University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- 20-80 yrs old and ASA physical status I or II,
- Receiving minor surgery, ex: breast surgery or cystoscope
Exclusion criteria:
- The patient is at high risk of aspiration, ex:obesity, pregnancy upper GI bleeding or not enough fasting time.
- The patient could not open mouth or upper airway obstruction
- The patient receive major surgery, ex: heart, brain, lung, liver, kidney surgery.
- The patient has abnormal heart and lung function.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: LMA proseal
The investigator will use proseal LMA in this study. The cuff of the proseal LMA could be inflation. It is thought to fix the larynx shape. The investigator wants to test the efficacy during 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position. |
It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region.
The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: igel LMA
igel LMA did not have cuff. The shape, softness and contours accurately mirror the perilaryngeal anatomy. The investigator want to test the efficacy of the igel at 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position. |
It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: air Q LMA
The air-Q LMA should be used routinely as a classic passive airway. It is user-friendly, placement in patients is easy and air movement is outstanding. It has the added benefit of allowing for intubation using standard ET Tubes. It also has the cuff and the contour of the mask is thought to mimic the the shape of the perilaryngeal region. The investigator want to test the efficacy of the air Q LMA at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position. |
It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region.
The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: ambu LMA
ambu LMA is also an cuff device LMA.
The investigator wanted to test the efficacy about the leak pressure and the view at 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position.
|
It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region.
The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord
Time Frame: If the ambu bag is flattening during the surgery, the observers check the leak pressure between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord
|
The oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at fixed O2 flow 3L/min and 20 cm H2O.
If the ambu bag is flattening, the observers will think the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and the vocal cord
|
If the ambu bag is flattening during the surgery, the observers check the leak pressure between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Use fiberscope to observe the sealing between the mask and vocal cord while changing head and neck position in perioperative period using different types of supraglottic airway device.
Time Frame: During the surgery
|
The observer uses the fiberscope to observe the sealing between the vocal cord and epiglottis.
|
During the surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cihmin Liu, anesthesiology department,National Taiwan University hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201306042RIND
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on LMA proseal
-
University of MalayaCompletedA Randomized Comparison of LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) Supreme and LMA Proseal in Infants Below 10kgLaryngeal Mask AirwayMalaysia
-
Prince of Songkla UniversityUnknownInadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or VentilationThailand
-
Medical University InnsbruckCompleted
-
Medical University InnsbruckCompletedVentilation | Difficult AirwayAustria
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompletedOropharyngeal InjuryKorea, Republic of
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedAirway Complication of AnaesthesiaTurkey
-
Medical University InnsbruckCompleted
-
Dr.Mahak MehtaCompletedProseal LMA vs Air-Q LMA vs Ambu AurGain LMA
-
National University of MalaysiaUnknownEvaluation of Optimal Operating Table Height for Successful Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask AirwayMalaysia
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoCompletedChildrenUnited States