A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy of a Novel Cellular, Acellular, Matrix-like Product (CAMP) Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Post-Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects. (BIOMOHS)

July 6, 2026 updated by: BioLab Holdings
A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial assessing the efficacy of a novel cellular, acellular, matrix-like product (CAMP) plus standard of sare versus standard of sare slone in the management of post-mohs micrographic surgery defects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will utilize a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial design.

Subjects will be adult patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery with resulting post-excisional defects suitable for healing by secondary intention or management with a topical matrix-like product.

Subjects will be randomized to receive:

  • CAMP plus Standard of Care (SOC), or
  • Control Dressing plus SOC. Randomization will occur after confirmation of final Mohs stage and measurement of the post-excisional defect.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The potential subject must be at least 18 years of age or older.
  • The potential subject must have undergone Mohs micrographic surgery for a cutaneous malignancy (e.g., basal cell carcinoma, or squamous cell carcinoma).
  • The potential subject must have a post-Mohs surgical defect that is suitable for treatment with a CAMP product or healing by secondary intention.
  • The surgical site has received standard Mohs excision and hemostasis with no requirement for immediate flap or graft reconstruction as determined by the treating surgeon.
  • If the surgical defect is on the lower extremity, the limb must have adequate perfusion confirmed by vascular assessment. Any of the following methods performed within 3 months of the first screening visit are acceptable:

    1. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and ≤ 1.3;
    2. Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) ≥ 0.6;
    3. Transcutaneous Oxygen Measurement (TCOM) ≥ 40 mmHg;
    4. Pulse Volume Recording (PVR): biphasic.
  • If the subject has multiple Mohs defects, they must be separated by at least 2 cm. The largest defect satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designated as the target wound.
  • The potential subject must agree to attend the weekly study visits required by the protocol.
  • The potential subject must be willing and able to participate in the informed consent process.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The potential subject is known to have a life expectancy of < 6 months.
  • The potential subject's target wound is not secondary to a Mohs excision. -

    -. The target wound is infected or there is cellulitis in the surrounding skin.

  • The target wound:

    1. Exposes tendon, bone, or joint space, and/or[MM6.1][RB6.2]
    2. Requires immediate complex flap or graft reconstruction in the judgment of the surgeon.
  • The potential subject has participated in a clinical trial involving treatment with an investigational product within the previous 30 days.
  • The potential subject has glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) greater than 10% within 3 months of the initial screening visit.
  • The potential subject, in the opinion of the investigator, has a medical or psychological condition that may interfere with study assessments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Dressing + Standard of Care
Standard of care will be cleaning, debridement, ulcer moisture balance, control dressing and offloading.
Beginning at the screening visit, participants will receive weekly treatment with standard of care (cleaning, debridement, ulcer moisture balance, and offloading) until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 6 weeks, whichever occurs first.
Other: CAMP + Standard of Care
Membrane Wrap-Lite is a human amniotic membrane tissue allograft derived from human placental tissue.
Participants will receive weekly applications of caregraFT™ and Standard of Care until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 6 weeks, whichever occurs first.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Wound Closure
Time Frame: 1-6 Weeks
The percentage of target wounds achieving complete wound closure in 6 weeks.
1-6 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Closure
Time Frame: 1-6 Weeks
Time to closure for the target wound.
1-6 Weeks
Percentage Area Reduction
Time Frame: 1-6 weeks
Percentage wound area reduction from TV-1 to TV-6 measured weekly with digital photographic planimetry using imaging device and physical examination.
1-6 weeks
Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1-6 Weeks
The number of product- or procedure-related adverse events.
1-6 Weeks
Wound Volume Reduction
Time Frame: 1-6 Weeks
Percentage wound volume reduction from TV-1 to TV-6 measured weekly with digital photographic planimetry using imaging device and physical examination.
1-6 Weeks
Product or Procedure Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1-6 Weeks
The number of product- or procedure-related adverse events.
1-6 Weeks
Numeric Pain Scale
Time Frame: 1-6 weeks
Change in pain at the target wound site assessed using a numeric pain scale. 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
1-6 weeks
Economic Outcomes
Time Frame: 1-6 Weeks
Health economic outcomes, including direct and indirect cost of care.
1-6 Weeks
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1- 6 Weeks
Change in quality of life, using the Wound Quality of Life questionnaire. [Time frame: TV-1, TV-4, TV-6/final visit].
1- 6 Weeks
Scare and Cosmetic Outcomes
Time Frame: 12 Months
Scar and cosmetic outcomes at 12 months using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). 0 being normal and 10 being very different.
12 Months
Time to Complete Granulation Tissue
Time Frame: 1-6 Weeks
Time to complete granulation tissue confirmed by independent assessment.
1-6 Weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Perfusion
Time Frame: 1-6 Weeks
1. Changes in local perfusion at the surgical site over the 6-week treatment period, assessed via near-infrared spectroscopy.
1-6 Weeks
Rate of Recurrence
Time Frame: 12 Months
The rate of recurrence within 12 months of closure when applicable.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Serena, MD, Serena Group, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe