Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa

July 8, 2026 updated by: University of Pennsylvania
Consistent use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is essential for achieving suppression among people with HIV (PWH). Yet despite improvements in access to ART and improving viral suppression rates, an estimated one-third of PWH globally do not take ART as prescribed, thus allowing the virus to remain detectable and transmissible. This study tests whether a low-cost visual education tool, B-OK bottles, improves understanding of HIV, antiretroviral therapy (ART), and the concept of Undetectable = Untransmittable (U=U) among adults in Gauteng, South Africa using a randomized trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) standard-of-care verbal information based on Department of Health guidelines, (2) information delivered in person using B-OK bottles, or (3) information delivered via a video demonstrating the B-OK bottles. The study will compare the two intervention formats to standard care, and to each other, to assess whether the tool improves knowledge, attitudes, and intentions related to HIV treatment and prevention, and whether the intervention results depend on delivery mode (in-person vs. video). Outcomes will be measured at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at six-week follow-up.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Residing in Gauteng
  • Able to understand and communicate in English or another study-supported language
  • Willing to attend an in-person study visit at the HE2RO offices
  • Willing to provide contact details for follow-up at six weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent for study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Participants enrolled in the control group will receive standard-of-care verbal information about HIV and ART based on South African Department of Health guidelines, delivered via standardized script.
Participants enrolled in this group will receive standard-of-care verbal information about HIV and ART based on South African Department of Health guidelines, delivered via standardized script.
Experimental: B-OK Bottles Intervention (delivered in person)
Participants enrolled in this group will receive information about HIV and ART that is communicated using B-OK bottles as visual aids to make the information more salient. The bottles explain how HIV affects a person's health and how ART reduces viral load and eliminates HIV transmission risk.
Participants in this group will receive information about HIV and ART that is communicated using B-OK bottles as visual aids to make the information more salient. The bottles explain how HIV affects a person's health and how ART reduces viral load and eliminates HIV transmission risk.
Experimental: B-OK Bottles Intervention (delivered by video)
Participants enrolled in this group will receive information about HIV and ART in the form of a video that illustrates B-OK. The video will use the bottles to explain how HIV affects a person's health and how ART reduces viral load and eliminates HIV transmission risk.
Participants in this group will receive information about HIV and ART in the form of a video that illustrates the B-OK bead bottles and how they work. The video will demonstrate use of the B-OK bead bottles to explain how HIV affects a person's health and how ART reduces viral load and eliminates HIV transmission risk.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of beliefs about ART effectiveness (composite), post-intervention
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention

A composite score will be derived from two items assessing beliefs about the effectiveness of HIV treatment, each scored 0-10: (1) prevention benefit - "Imagine a person living with HIV who is taking HIV treatment and has an undetectable viral load. How likely is it that this person would pass HIV to a regular sexual partner?"; (2) clinical benefit - "Imagine a person living with HIV who is taking HIV treatment and has an undetectable viral load. How likely is it that this person would be harmed by HIV?"

The two items will be combined into a composite, to be pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan; lower scores indicate more accurate beliefs about the prevention and clinical benefits of HIV treatment with viral suppression.

Immediately post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of U=U transmission-risk belief
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
The outcome will be measured on a 0-10 scale, based on this question: "Imagine a person living with HIV who is taking HIV treatment and has an undetectable viral load. How likely is it that this person would pass HIV to a regular sexual partner?" Minimum 0, maximum 10; lower scores indicate more accurate beliefs consistent with U=U.
Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
Accuracy of belief about personal harm under viral suppression
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
The outcome will be measured on a 0-10 scale, based on this question: "Imagine a person living with HIV who is taking HIV treatment and has an undetectable viral load. How likely is it that this person would be harmed by HIV?" Minimum 0, maximum 10; lower scores indicate more accurate belief.
Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
Accuracy of beliefs about ART effectiveness (composite), follow-up
Time Frame: 6 weeks follow-up

A composite score will be derived from two items assessing beliefs about the effectiveness of HIV treatment, each scored 0-10: (1) prevention benefit - "Imagine a person living with HIV who is taking HIV treatment and has an undetectable viral load. How likely is it that this person would pass HIV to a regular sexual partner?"; (2) clinical benefit - "Imagine a person living with HIV who is taking HIV treatment and has an undetectable viral load. How likely is it that this person would be harmed by HIV?"

The two items will be combined into a composite, to be pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan; lower scores indicate more accurate beliefs about the prevention and clinical benefits of HIV treatment with viral suppression.

6 weeks follow-up
Comprehension of "viral suppression"
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
This outcome measures self-rated understanding of the term "viral suppression," based on the question: "How well do you understand the term 'viral suppression'?" Measured on a 0-10 scale. Minimum 0, maximum 10; higher scores indicate greater comprehension.
Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
Comprehension of "U=U" / "Undetectable=Untransmittable"
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
This outcome measures self-rated understanding of the term "U=U" or "Undetectable=Untransmittable," based on the question: "How well do you understand the term 'U=U' or 'Undetectable=Untransmittable'?" Measured on a 0-10 scale. Minimum 0, maximum 10; higher scores indicate greater comprehension.
Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
Attitude - residual transmission concern despite ART
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
The outcome measures agreement that HIV medication does not completely eliminate the risk of getting HIV through sex. Measured on a 0-10 scale. Minimum 0, maximum 10; higher scores indicate greater concern.
Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
Attitude - HIV fatalism
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up

This outcome measures agreement with "Having HIV means I will eventually die from it".

Measured on a 0-10 scale. Minimum 0, maximum 10; higher scores indicate higher fatalistic beliefs about HIV.

Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
Intention - condom use under hypothetical viral suppression
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up

This outcome measures self-rated likelihood of using a condom to prevent transmission to an HIV-negative partner, in a hypothetical scenario where the participant is virally suppressed on treatment.

Measured on a 0-10 scale. Minimum 0, maximum 10; higher scores indicate greater likelihood of condom use.

Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up
Intention - motivation to initiate or continue ART
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up

This outcome measures the self-rated motivation to stay on or restart HIV treatment.

Measured on a 0-10 scale. Minimum 0, maximum 10; higher scores indicate greater motivation.

For participants living with HIV, the question refers to their own treatment; for participants who are HIV-negative or of unknown status, it is framed as a hypothetical scenario.

Immediately post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Richterman, PhD, University of Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The investigators are still determining the data sharing plan and if we will be sharing IPD yet.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Control

3
Subscribe