- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07707557
Comparing Pain Levels With or Without Topical Anesthesia During Infiltration Injection in Patients Undergoing Tooth Extraction.
Evaluating the Efficacy of Topical Anesthesia in Alleviating Pain During Infiltrate Injection in Abbasi Shaheed Hospital/KMDC
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This randomized clinical trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of 5% topical lidocaine in reducing pain associated with infiltration anesthesia in patients undergoing tooth extraction. Pain during local anesthetic administration remains a common cause of anxiety and fear among dental patients and may negatively affect treatment acceptance, patient cooperation, and overall clinical experience.
The study will be conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, and the Department of Oral Surgery, KMDC. A total of 120 eligible adult patients requiring tooth extraction will be recruited after obtaining informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups using sealed opaque envelopes. Group A will receive conventional infiltration anesthesia with 2% lidocaine alone, while Group B will receive 5% topical lidocaine prior to administration of 2% lidocaine infiltration anesthesia.
The primary outcome measure will be pain intensity, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Pain scores will be recorded at 5, 15, and 30 minutes following the procedure. Relevant demographic and clinical variables, including age, gender, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension, will also be collected to evaluate potential confounding factors.
The intervention poses minimal risk to participants, as both topical and infiltrative lidocaine are routinely used and well-established agents in dental practice. Patients with known allergies to lidocaine, pregnant or lactating women, and individuals unwilling to participate will be excluded to ensure participant safety. All participants will receive the standard of care required for tooth extraction irrespective of study allocation.
The anticipated benefit of this study is the generation of evidence regarding the effectiveness of topical anesthesia as an adjunctive measure for reducing injection-related pain. The findings may contribute to improved patient comfort, reduced anxiety, enhanced treatment acceptance, and optimization of pain management protocols in routine dental practice.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sindh
-
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 74200
- Abbasi Shaheed Hospital and Karachi Medical and Dental College
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients aged 18-65 years of age who underwent extraction of tooth.
- no intolerance or allergies to lidocaine 2% infiltration and lidocaine 5% topical.
- Patients should not take sedative analgesics or anxiety medications in the 12 hour prior to extraction
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Patient not giving consent to undergo the procedure.
- Patient with occurrence of skin or mucosal allergy or abnormal reaction at the vascular access site.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Arm Type 1: Placebo Comparator (2% lidocaine hydrochloride infiltration injection alone)
Arm 1: Control Group Title: 2% lidocaine hydrochloride injection Description: Participants receive conventional 2% lidocaine hydrochloride infiltration anesthesia without prior application of topical lidocaine. |
Participants assigned to Arm 1 will receive conventional local anesthesia using a 2% lidocaine hydrochloride infiltration injection before tooth extraction.
No topical anesthetic will be applied prior to the injection.
This arm serves as the control group and represents the standard practice against which the effect of pre-injection topical lidocaine anesthesia will be compared.
|
|
Experimental: A2: Experimental (5% topical lidocaine hydrochloride preparation+2% lidocaine hydrochloride injecti
Arm 2: Experimental Group Title: Topical 5% Lidocaine hydrochloride preparation Plus 2% lidocaine hydrochloride Infiltration injection Description: Participants receive 5% topical lidocaine hydrochloride preparation before administration of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride infiltration injection. |
Participants assigned to Arm 1 will receive conventional local anesthesia using a 2% lidocaine hydrochloride infiltration injection before tooth extraction.
No topical anesthetic will be applied prior to the injection.
This arm serves as the control group and represents the standard practice against which the effect of pre-injection topical lidocaine anesthesia will be compared.
Participants assigned to Arm 2 will receive 5% topical lidocaine applied to the mucosal injection site before administration of a 2% lidocaine hydrochloride infiltration injection for tooth extraction.
The topical anesthetic is administered as a pre-treatment to reduce pain and discomfort associated with needle insertion and anesthetic infiltration.
This arm represents the experimental intervention and will be compared with the control group receiving infiltration anesthesia alone.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity During Infiltration Injection Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes post-procedure
|
Pain intensity following infiltration injection will be assessed using a 0-10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 5, 15, and 30 minutes after the procedure
|
5 minutes, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes post-procedure
|
|
Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: 5 minutes, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes post-procedure
|
Pain intensity following infiltration injection will be assessed using a 0-10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 5, 15, and 30 minutes after the procedure.
|
5 minutes, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes post-procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: FARWA MUHAMMAD, BACHELOR OF DENTAL SURGERY, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB/KMDC/KMU/26/2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Discomfort
-
Université Catholique de LouvainRecruitingAbdominal Pain/ Discomfort | Intestinal DiscomfortBelgium
-
Loma Linda UniversityCompletedDiscomfortUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
a2 Milk Company Ltd.Completed
-
University of FloridaLallemand Health SolutionsCompletedMenstrual DiscomfortUnited States
-
Canopy Growth CorporationJames Madison UniversityCompleted
-
Abyss IngredientsArtialisCompletedKnee DiscomfortBelgium
-
Probi ABTerminatedAbdominal DiscomfortGermany
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedMedical Device Discomfort | Application Site DiscomfortUnited States
Clinical Trials on 2% Lidocaine hydrochloride infiltrate injection
-
Harrow IncEnrolling by invitationRetinal Vein Occlusion | Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) | Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) | Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)United States
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalActive, not recruitingMyofascial PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical CentreNot yet recruitingPost Operative Sore Throat at 6hrs and 24hrs After Endotracheal Intubation
-
Northwestern UniversityFirst Lviv Medical UnionNot yet recruiting
-
Zodiac Produtos Farmaceuticos S.A.CompletedMetastatic Breast Cancer | Advanced Ovarian CancerBrazil
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingOCTA Changes With Local Anesthesia
-
Tianjin Medical University General HospitalCompleted
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedSedation | ERCP | Duodenal SpasmTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Tianjin Medical University General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Tianjin Medical University General HospitalNot yet recruiting