PROPER-GERD: A Prospective Crossover Study to Evaluate Probe Placement Optimization for Reflux Testing in Women and Lower-BMI Patients (PROPER-GERD)

July 16, 2026 updated by: University of Chicago
This is a prospective, within-subject controlled study involving simultaneous dual placement of wireless Bravo pH probes in each participant. Patients will receive pH testing when symptomatic for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to confirm diagnosis as part of standard of care. Each test is 96 hours with a symptom diary, GERD-HRQL, and RSI collected, which is also standard of care for patients presenting with GERD symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Each participant will undergo one Bravo pH monitoring sessions with two simultaneous probes placed Standard Bravo probe placed 6 cm above squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) as standard of care.

Experimental Bravo probe placed 1 cm above SCJ at the same time of standard of care procedure

One probe will be placed 1 cm above the SCJ (distal position), and the other 6 cm above the SCJ (standard position), using traditional SCJ visualization for placement. The capsule placed at the traditional 6 cm placement is standard of care for GERD diagnosis and will be billed through clinical care. The capsule placed at 1 cm above the SCJ is considered experimental and is the only one requiring study support. Thus only 80 additional capsules are requested through study support.

EndoFLIP measurements will be collected independently to evaluate consistency or variation in LES localization and to analyze potential correlations with pH findings. These measurements will be reviewed in real-time, and if significant variation from SCJ-based localization is observed in the first 20 patients, the protocol may be amended to allow EndoFLIP-guided probe placement for the remaining participants. Significant variation will be defined as a mean discrepancy of greater than 2 cm between the SCJ-based and EndoFLIP-derived LES landmarks in greater than equal to 50 percent of the first 20 patients. If this threshold is met, the protocol will be amended to incorporate EndoFLIP-guided placement for subsequent participants. If no significant variation is found, we will continue collect EndoFLIP data in all participants as part of the research protocol. The primary use is to record the physiologic LES location and its distensibility, and to explore its potential value as an adjunctive diagnostic marker.

Participants will undergo 96 hours of Bravo pH monitoring monitoring off acid suppression. Patients will be asked to maintain their symptom diary for up to 14 days, with a minimum of 7 days required for inclusion in the study. Data will be collected according to standard Bravo protocol, including logging of mealtimes, symptom occurrence, and recumbency periods. Standardized symptom assessment tools GERD-HRQL and RSI will be administered. This design allows for direct, matched comparisons of diagnostic yield between placement strategies within the same patient. Data management will be conducted using PatientIQ, the HIPAA-compliant institutional platform currently used at our site to collect clinical and research data. This includes both clinical variables and patient-reported outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-90
  • Typical GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, chest discomfort)
  • No prior foregut surgery
  • Ability to undergo endoscopy with sedation and consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known motility disorders (e.g., achalasia)
  • Barrett's esophagus >3 cm
  • Pregnancy
  • Chronic opioid use
  • Inability to tolerate endoscopy or EndoFLIP
  • Presence of large type III or IV paraesophageal hernia
  • Previous esophageal or gastric surgery, including previous hiatal hernia repair

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: one Bravo pH monitoring sessions

Each participant will undergo one Bravo pH monitoring sessions with two simultaneous probes placed Standard Bravo probe placed 6 cm above SCJ as standard of care.

Experimental Bravo probe placed 1 cm above SCJ at the same time of standard of care procedure

One probe will be placed 1 cm above the SCJ (distal position), and the other 6 cm above the SCJ (standard position), using traditional SCJ visualization for placement. The capsule placed at the traditional 6 cm placement is standard of care for GERD diagnosis and will be billed through clinical care. The capsule placed at 1 cm above the SCJ is considered experimental and is the only one requiring study support. Thus only 80 additional capsules are requested through study support.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic sensitivity of Bravo pH testing defined by total percent time pH < 4 over the 96-hour monitoring period
Time Frame: Days 0-Day 4
One probe will be placed 1 cm above the SCJ (distal position), and the other 6 cm above the SCJ (standard position), using traditional SCJ visualization for placement to measure reflux episodes.
Days 0-Day 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of EndoFLIP-derived LES localization compared to visually identified SCJ
Time Frame: Day 0
EndoFLIP measurements will be collected independently to evaluate consistency or variation in LES localization and to analyze potential correlations with pH findings.
Day 0
symptom diary
Time Frame: Day 0- Day 14
Patients will be asked to maintain their symptom diary for up to 14 days, with a minimum of 7 days required for inclusion in the study. Data will be collected according to standard Bravo protocol, including logging of mealtimes, symptom occurrence, and recumbency periods.
Day 0- Day 14
Comparison of concordance between DeMeester score at each probe location.
Time Frame: Day 5- Day 10
Standardized symptom assessment tools GERD-HRQL and RSI will be administered. Comparison of concordance between DeMeester score, total acid exposure time, and symptom burden (GERD-HRQL and RSI) at each probe location.
Day 5- Day 10
Comparison of concordance between total acid exposure time at each probe location.
Time Frame: Day 5- Day 10
Standardized symptom assessment tools GERD-HRQL and RSI will be administered. Comparison of concordance between DeMeester score, total acid exposure time, and symptom burden (GERD-HRQL and RSI) at each probe location.
Day 5- Day 10
Comparison of concordance between symptom burden (GERD-HRQL and RSI) at each probe location.
Time Frame: Day 5- Day 10
Standardized symptom assessment tools GERD-HRQL and RSI will be administered. Comparison of concordance between DeMeester score, total acid exposure time, and symptom burden (GERD-HRQL and RSI) at each probe location.
Day 5- Day 10
Correlation of EndoFLIP metrics (LES distensibility, diameter) with DeMeester score and acid exposure
Time Frame: Day 0
EndoFLIP measurements will be collected independently to evaluate consistency or variation in LES localization and to analyze potential correlations with pH findings.
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on GERD

Clinical Trials on Bravo pH monitoring sessions

Subscribe