Supporting Mental Health and Reducing Care Stress in Caregivers of Persons With Cardiovascular Disease

July 16, 2026 updated by: University of California, Davis

Supporting Mental Health and Reducing Care Stress in Caregivers of Persons With Cardiovascular Disease: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study of Caregiving Support in Cardiac Rehabilitation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preliminary efficacy, feasibility, acceptability, and barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Confident Caregiver intervention among family caregivers of persons with cardiovascular disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation. Caregivers receive four individualized intervention sessions focused on assessment of caregiving challenges, tailored coaching, stress reduction, education, and referrals to supportive resources. Outcomes include reductions in caregiving-related challenges, improvements in mental health, and reductions in stress.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study evaluates the Confident Caregiver intervention among family caregivers of persons with cardiovascular disease enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation. The intervention consists of four individualized sessions delivered virtually by a trained interventionist over approximately 8 to 12 weeks. Sessions include assessment of caregiving challenges, tailored coaching and action planning to address caregiving challenges, stress reduction strategies, caregiver education, and referrals to services and supports.

Primary intervention efficacy endpoints are: improvement in caregiving challenges and improvement in caregiving-related difficulties

Secondary intervention efficacy endpoints are: improvement in caregiver mental health (depression, anxiety), improvement in caregiver stress (both general and caregiving-specific), and improvement in caregiver overall well-being

Exploratory intervention efficacy endpoints are: improvement in clinic-level cardiac rehab outcomes for cardiac rehab patients (average # of sessions attended, average program completion, program satisfaction, improvement in patient biomarkers, and improvement in person-centered patient outcomes)

Investigators will also evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of intervention for caregiver participants and clinicians in cardiac rehab

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Recruiting
        • University of California Davis Health System
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Is a caregiver for a patient receiving care in our UC Davis Cardiac Rehabilitation Clinic. A caregiver is defined as someone who provides support to the patient with one or more basic or instrumental activities of daily living.
  • Has one or more caregiving-related challenges or issues that they would like support with
  • Is able to read and speak in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is a paid professional caregiver with no family or fictive kin relationship with the care recipient
  • Has a diagnosis of major cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's or related dementias
  • Is unable to complete the protocol or participate in the intervention (e.g., unavailable during the intervention period, unable to access or use virtual meeting technology)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Confident Caregiver Intervention

Participants receive four individual intervention sessions delivered virtually over approximately 8 to 12 weeks.

The intervention includes assessment of caregiving challenges, tailored coaching and action planning to address caregiving challenges, stress reduction strategies, caregiver education, and referrals to services and supports.

All enrolled caregivers receive the Confident Caregiver intervention. No comparison group is included.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of Caregiving Difficulty Scale - developed by Gitlin et al and previously used in the COPE trial (Care of Persons With Dementia in Their Environments). Range 1-10, higher scores indicate greater caregiving difficulty.
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Average change in caregiving difficulty rating across the care challenge areas addressed during the intervention
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Level of Caregiving Upset Scale - developed by Gitlin et al and previously used in the COPE trial. Range 1-10, higher scores indicate greater caregiving-related upset.
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Average change in caregiving upset rating across the care challenge areas addressed during the intervention
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Level of Caregiving Confidence Scale - developed by Gitlin et al and previously used in the COPE trial. Range 1-10, higher scores indicate greater caregiving confidence.
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Average change in caregiving confidence rating across the care challenge areas addressed during the intervention
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Caregiver Depression
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in caregiver depressive symptoms as measured by the PHQ-8 (Patient Health Questionnaire-8). Range 0-24, higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in Caregiver Anxiety
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in caregiver symptoms of anxiety as measured by the GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). Range 0-21, higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in Caregiver Stress (General)
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in caregiver stress (general) as measured by the PSS-10 (Perceived Stress Scale-10). Range 0-40, higher scores indicate greater stress.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in Overall Caregiving Stress
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in overall caregiving stress as measured by the ZBI-12 (Short Form Zarit Burden Interview). Range 0-48, higher scores indicate greater stress.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in Caregiver Stress (Physical)
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in physical caregiving stress (single item from Schulz & Beach). Range 0-3, higher scores indicate greater stress.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in Caregiver Stress (Emotional)
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in emotional caregiving stress (single item from Schulz & Beach). Range 0-3, higher scores indicate greater stress.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in Caregiver Stress (Financial)
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in financial caregiving stress (single item from Schulz & Beach). Range 0-3, higher scores indicate greater stress.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Overall Improvement in Caregiver Well-Being
Time Frame: At time of completion of the Confident Caregiver Intervention
Average scores on the PCI-13 (Caregiver Perceived Change Index-13) indicative of improvement in caregiving-related factors. Range 13-65, higher scores indicate greater improvement in caregiver well-being.
At time of completion of the Confident Caregiver Intervention
Change in Caregiver Physical Health Status
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in overall physical health as measured by the PROMIS Global Health-10, Global Physical Health score. Scores are standardized against the US general population, with a mean of 50 representing the population average. Higher scores indicate better physical health.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in Caregiver Mental Health Status
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention
Change in overall mental health as measured by the PROMIS Global Health-10, Global Mental Health score. Scores are standardized against the US general population, with a mean of 50 representing the population average. Higher scores indicate better mental health.
From baseline to immediately following completion of the Confident Caregiver intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2369399
  • GBMF9048 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Confident Caregiver Intervention

3
Subscribe