Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Pain

July 23, 2026 updated by: Algiamed Technologies USA, Inc.

Can a Non-interventional Pulsed Radiofrequency Device Relieve Pain and Improve Function in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy That Are Refractory to Medication? A Single Blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine if a non-invasive, electrical pulsed radio frequency (PRF) device can relieve pain and improve function in patients suffering from diabetic nerve pain in their feet, known as pedal diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Patients with this condition often experience severe pain, burning sensations, numbness, and tingling. Current medications for diabetic nerve pain often have unwanted side effects or do not provide sufficient relief.

In this single-blind, randomized trial, participants are assigned to receive either an active PRF treatment or a placebo (sham) treatment. Both treatments involve placing the device safely behind the knee (targeting the sciatic nerve) for 10 minutes, once a week for 3 weeks. The main question this study aims to answer is whether the active PRF treatment reduces nerve pain and symptoms significantly more than the placebo, measured by standard symptom questionnaires over a 6-month period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes, often presenting as a chronic, symmetrical, length-dependent sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Patients frequently experience neuropathic pain, hyperalgesia, allodynia, and paraesthesia in the lower extremities. Because pharmacological treatments for painful DPN are often ineffective and complicated by adverse side effects, there is a significant unmet clinical need for alternative, non-pharmacological therapies. This single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluates the efficacy of a transcutaneous electrical pulsed radio frequency (PRF) device in alleviating the pain and sensory symptoms associated with pedal DPN.

Patients diagnosed with pedal DPN who scored 4 or higher on the DN4 neuropathic pain diagnostic test were randomized into two parallel groups: an active treatment group and a placebo group. To ensure successful patient blinding, participants were advised that they might not feel a physical sensation during the treatment, which aligns with the natural sensory loss (numbness/paraesthesia) commonly experienced by this patient population. Care providers and investigators administering the interventions were unblinded.

The treatment protocol involved mapping the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa posteriorly at the knee. The active or placebo device was then applied bilaterally at this site for 10 minutes. Interventions were administered once weekly for three consecutive weeks.

Clinical efficacy was assessed using validated patient-reported outcome measures. The primary outcome evaluated changes in neuropathic pain and symptoms using the DN4 test, while the secondary outcome measured pain severity and interference with daily life using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). Data was collected at baseline, immediately following the third treatment, and at subsequent follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months to evaluate both immediate and sustained therapeutic effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • South Africa
    • Gauteng
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology (CDE), Houghton
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Clinical Sites - West Johannesburg
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Diabetic Clinic at the Charlotte Maxeke Hospital
      • Krugersdorp, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Clinical Sites - Krugersdorp
      • Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
        • CDE / Clinical Sites - Pretoria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of pedal Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.
  • A score of 4 or greater than 4/10 on the DN4 Test.
  • Naive to (no previous experience with) the electrical pulsed radio frequency current treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current pregnancy.
  • Presence of a pacemaker.
  • Presence of a peripheral or spinal cord stimulator.
  • Presence of metal implants in the knee and/or hip.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A: Active Transcutaneous Pulsed Radio Frequency
Patients in this group received the active electrical pulsed radiofrequency current treatment. The device was applied bilaterally at the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Each treatment session lasted for 10 minutes. The intervention was administered once weekly for three consecutive weeks.
Device: NMS 460 Pulsed Radio Frequency Device
Active transcutaneous electrical pulsed radio frequency stimulation. The device is applied bilaterally at the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa for 10 minutes, once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks.
Other Names:
  • Active PRF
  • tPRF
Sham Comparator: Group B: Placebo / Sham Device
Patients in this group received a placebo (sham) treatment designed to mimic the active device. The placebo device was applied bilaterally at the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Each placebo session lasted for 10 minutes. The sham intervention was administered once weekly for three consecutive weeks.
Device: Placebo Device
A sham device designed to look and operate like the active device but delivering no therapeutic current. It is applied bilaterally at the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa for 10 minutes, once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks to mimic the active treatment.
Other Names:
  • Sham PRF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Neuropathic Pain and Symptoms as Measured by the DN4 Test
Time Frame: Baseline, prior to the third treatment (Week 3), and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment.
The DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4) questionnaire is a screening tool used to identify neuropathic pain and symptoms. It consists of 7 subjective questions regarding sensory symptoms (e.g., burning, painful cold, electric shocks, tingling, pins and needles, numbness) and 3 objective tests (hypoesthesia to touch, pinprick, and tactile allodynia). The maximum score is 10 points. A score of 4 or greater out of 10 represents a positive diagnosis of neuropathic pain. Higher scores indicate a greater severity of neuropathic pain and symptoms.
Baseline, prior to the third treatment (Week 3), and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Severity as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment (Week 1), second treatment (Week 2), third treatment (post-treatment at Week 3), and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment.
The BPI-SF is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that evaluates pain. This outcome focuses on the Pain Severity subscale, which assesses worst, least, average, and present pain using an 11-point numerical rating scale. Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 equals "no pain" and 10 equals "pain as bad as you can imagine". Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.
Baseline, after the first treatment (Week 1), second treatment (Week 2), third treatment (post-treatment at Week 3), and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment.
Change in Pain Interference as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment (Week 1), second treatment (Week 2), third treatment (post-treatment at Week 3), and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment.
The BPI-SF also evaluates how much pain interferes with various aspects of the patient's daily life. This includes general activities, work, sleep, walking ability, mood, relations with other people, and overall quality of life. Interference is measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 equals "does not interfere" and 10 equals "completely interferes". Higher scores indicate greater interference with daily functioning.
Baseline, after the first treatment (Week 1), second treatment (Week 2), third treatment (post-treatment at Week 3), and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Algiamed Technologies USA, Inc.

Collaborators

Xavant Technology (Pty) Ltd

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Phyllis P Berger, Faculty: University of the Witwatersrand
  • Study Director: Stanley S Landau, Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology (CDE)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M161037

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be publicly shared in a secondary data repository. De-identified aggregate data and study findings are presented in the primary manuscript and supporting protocol documents.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on NMS 460 Pulsed Radio Frequency Device

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Oman

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe