- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07740343
Remimazolam for Postoperative Sleep in Elderly Patients
Remimazolam and Postoperative Sleep in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Randomized, Double-Blind, PSG-Based Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer is the most commonly used surgical approach for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. Although this technique is less invasive than traditional open surgery, more than 60% of elderly patients still experience significant sleep fragmentation and disturbance in the early postoperative period, making effective sleep preservation a key component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).
Sedative agents play a critical role in modulating perioperative sleep patterns. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, is considered a promising anesthetic for elderly patients due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and minimal dependence on hepatic and renal function. However, its impact on objective sleep architecture remains unclear. Propofol, the most widely used sedative in general anesthesia, has been reported to disrupt sleep cycles in the postoperative period, with inconsistent effects on slow-wave sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep.
Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for assessing sleep architecture, including total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep stage distribution, and arousals. Previous studies have demonstrated that remimazolam is associated with improvements in subjective sleep outcomes in surgical patients. However, current research on remimazolam's effects on postoperative sleep after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery remains limited, particularly lacking high-quality, prospective, randomized controlled studies using objective PSG measurements to verify whether remimazolam can achieve superior sleep outcomes compared with propofol. Therefore, this study adopts a randomized controlled trial design to verify whether remimazolam is superior to propofol in preserving postoperative sleep quality, providing more evidence-based options for anesthetic management in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Liqin Deng Deng
- Phone Number: 13909511651
- Email: dengliqin71@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Zeqing Gao Gao
- Phone Number: 19279516862
- Email: kkkkrystal0214@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Ningxia
-
Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
- Recruiting
- General hospital of ningxia medical university
-
Contact:
- Zeqing Gao
- Phone Number: 19279516862
- Email: kkkkrystal0214@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged between 65 and 80 years.
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class II-III.
- Able to understand the study protocol and provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known allergy to any study medications.
- Preoperative sleep disorder (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI] score > 10).
- Regular use of sedatives, antipsychotics or hormonal drugs within the past month.
- Preoperative cognitive impairment, screened using the education-adjusted Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
- Preoperative history of neurological or psychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, depression and anxiety disorders.
- Severe preoperative comorbidities involving the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, respiratory, hepatic or renal systems, as follows:New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV; current or recent (within 2 months) congestive heart failure; myocardial infarction or coronary stent implantation within the preceding 3 months; Uncontrolled frequent ventricular premature beats (>5 beats per minute), couplets, triplets, paired ventricular arrhythmias, multifocal ventricular premature beats, or R-on-T phenomenon; Second-degree atrioventricular block (Mobitz II type), third-degree atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome without pacemaker implantation; Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the preceding 3 months; Severe hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 180/110 mmHg); Severe respiratory tract infection (including common cold), or maximal voluntary ventilation (MMV) < 30% of the predicted value; Severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh score > 9); Acute or chronic renal failure without renal replacement therapy: Acute kidney injury was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (≥26.5 μmol/L) or a relative increase ≥ 50% from baseline, or urine output < 0.5 mL/(kg·h) for more than 6 consecutive hours. Chronic renal failure or uremia was defined as serum creatinine > 451 μmol/L and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m².
- Severe coagulation disorders.
- Refusal to participate in the trial.
- Anticipated postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Remimazolam (Group R)
Remimazolam was used for both anesthesia induction and maintenance
|
In the remimazolam group, anesthesia was induced with remimazolam 0.2 mg/kg, sufentanil 0.3-0.5 μg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6-0.8
mg/kg.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation, tracheal intubation was performed, and mechanical ventilation was initiated to maintain PETCO₂ at 30-40 mmHg.
Anesthesia was maintained with continuous infusions of remimazolam and remifentanil, guided by anesthetic depth monitoring.
Rocuronium was supplemented intermittently and discontinued 30 minutes before the end of surgery.Polysomnography (PSG) was performed both preoperatively and postoperatively to measure total sleep time and sleep architecture.
Subjective sleep quality was assessed using validated questionnaires during postoperative follow-up.
|
|
Active Comparator: Propofol (Group P)
Propofol was used for both anesthesia induction and maintenance.
|
In the propofol group, anesthesia was induced with propofol 1.0-1.5 mg/kg, sufentanil 0.3-0.5 μg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6-0.8
mg/kg.
Anesthesia was maintained with continuous infusions of propofol and remifentanil.
All other procedural details were identical to those in the remimazolam group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total sleep time (TST) on the first postoperative night
Time Frame: On the first postoperative night
|
Polysomnography (PSG) was used to assess total sleep time on the first postoperative night in both groups.
|
On the first postoperative night
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) Score
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1, Postoperative Day 2, Postoperative Day 3, Postoperative Day 7
|
Subjective sleep quality assessed via the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ), ranging from 0 to 100 points, with a higher score indicating better sleep quality.
Result interpretation: A total score < 50 indicates poor sleep quality; 50 - 69 points indicate average sleep quality; ≥ 70 points indicate good sleep quality.
|
Postoperative Day 1, Postoperative Day 2, Postoperative Day 3, Postoperative Day 7
|
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
Time Frame: 1 month postoperatively
|
Subjective sleep quality assessed via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
|
1 month postoperatively
|
|
Resting Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score
Time Frame: at 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively
|
Pain at rest was measured in both groups preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
at 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively
|
|
The incidence of postoperative delirium
Time Frame: at 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively
|
The incidence of postoperative delirium was evaluated in both groups at 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively using the 3-Minute Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM).
|
at 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative cognitive function
Time Frame: at 7 days postoperatively and at 1 month postoperatively
|
Cognitive function was assessed preoperatively, at 7 days postoperatively, and at 1 month postoperatively using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Scores range from 0 to 30; higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
|
at 7 days postoperatively and at 1 month postoperatively
|
|
Sleep efficiency assessed by polysomnography (PSG)
Time Frame: Postoperative Night 1
|
Sleep efficiency measured by polysomnography (PSG).
It is defined as the percentage of sleep time relative to total time spent in bed.
|
Postoperative Night 1
|
|
Number of awakenings after sleep onset assessed by polysomnography (PSG)
Time Frame: Postoperative Night 1
|
Number of awakenings after sleep onset measured by polysomnography (PSG).
|
Postoperative Night 1
|
|
Total wake time assessed by polysomnography (PSG)
Time Frame: Postoperative Night 1
|
Total duration of awakenings during sleep measured by polysomnography (PSG).
|
Postoperative Night 1
|
|
Proportion of each sleep stage assessed by polysomnography (PSG)
Time Frame: Postoperative Night 1
|
Proportion of each sleep stage measured by polysomnography (PSG), including N1,N2,N3 and REM.
|
Postoperative Night 1
|
|
Serum levels of cortisol
Time Frame: on the morning of postoperative day 1
|
Serum levels of cortisol were measured preoperatively and on the morning of postoperative day 1 and compared between the two groups.
|
on the morning of postoperative day 1
|
|
Movement Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1, Postoperative Day 2, Postoperative Day 3
|
Postoperative pain during movement assessed via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
Postoperative Day 1, Postoperative Day 2, Postoperative Day 3
|
|
Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level
Time Frame: Morning of postoperative day 1
|
Serum concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP).
|
Morning of postoperative day 1
|
|
Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
Time Frame: Morning of postoperative day 1
|
Serum concentration of interleukin-6 (IL-6).
|
Morning of postoperative day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RMZ on postoperative sleep
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.