Developing Biomarker-Supported Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) Prevention

July 30, 2026 updated by: Yizhou Ma, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Developing Biomarker-Supported SSD Prevention

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of a brief family-based psychosocial intervention that addresses modifiable SSD risk factors on persistent and distressing psychotic-like experiences in children and young adults with a family history of SSD and high versus low baseline SSD-like brain patterns

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Family history of SSD (defined as first-degree (e.g., a parent or a sibling), second-degree (e.g., an uncle or a grandparent), or other combinations of biological relatives in the family have or likely have a diagnosis of SSD or other closely related severe mental illnesses equivalent to at least 25% of genetic sharing) per medical record review and/or parent/legal guardian report and confirmed by a structured interview
  • screening positive for two or more risk factors targeted by the intervention
  • Participants and parent(s)/legal guardian(s) agree to participate
  • psychiatrically stable and have no major changes in antidepressant, stimulant, or antipsychotic medication in the past 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past history of psychotic disorders or clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-p) per study interview
  • Current or past antipsychotic medication use to specifically treat a psychotic disorder
  • major medical and neurological conditions
  • moderate to severe intellectual disabilities or mild intellectual disabilities but expected to have difficulty completing the study assessments;
  • current drug or alcohol use that impacts functioning and study engagement;
  • Not able to give assent, permission, or consent.
  • Not able to undergo MRI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Psychosocial intervention group
Over 16 weeks, participants and their parent/legal guardian(s)/caregiver(s) will attend weekly hour long family-based psychosocial intervention to work on their top 2 modifiable SSD-risk factors targeted by the risk reduction therapy (RRT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in persistent distressing psychotic-like experiences as assessed by a modified Prodromal Questionnaire Brief-Child Version (PQ-BC) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, end of intervention (16 weeks after baseline ), 1-year follow up
This is a 21 item questionnaire and items are scored as 0 (symptom not endorsed) or 1 (symptom endorsed). Items endorsed are further assessed for level of distress (1-5) and chronicity (present 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, or more than 2 years ago). The total symptom score is calculated as the sum of distress ratings of all items at baseline with 1) "Did it bother you?" answered "Y" AND 2) endorsed as distressing at one or more previous time points. The range of the total symptom score is 0 to 105. Higher scores indicate greater distressing and persistent psychotic-like experiences.
Baseline, 8 weeks, end of intervention (16 weeks after baseline ), 1-year follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Test Battery
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (16 weeks after baseline ), 1-year follow up
The NIH Toolbox subtests including List Sorting Working Memory, Pattern Comparison Processing Speed, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning will be used. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. Raw scores of the test taker are compared to the scores in the NIH Toolbox nationally representative normative sample to derive standard scores. The mean standard score is 100 and the standard deviation (SD) is 15. A score at or near 100 indicates average ability compared with others. Scores around 115 suggest above-average ability. Scores around 130 suggest superior ability (in the top 2 percent nationally). A score around 85 suggests below-average ability. A score in the range of 70 or below suggests significant impairment.
Baseline, end of intervention (16 weeks after baseline ), 1-year follow up
Change in psychopathology measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (16 weeks after baseline ), 1-year follow up
This is a 113 item questionnaire and each problem item is scored as: 0 (not true) 1(somewhat or sometimes true) and 2 (very true or often true). Raw scores are summed and converted to age- and sex-normed T-scores. Higher T-scores indicate greater overall psychopathology
Baseline, end of intervention (16 weeks after baseline ), 1-year follow up
Change in stress level measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (16 weeks after baseline ), 1-year follow up
This is a 10 item questionnaire and each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0(never) to 4 (very often). Positively worded items are reverse scored, and all items are summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Baseline, end of intervention (16 weeks after baseline ), 1-year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yizhou Ma, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe