Learning to THRIVE (L2T) Program Pilot (L2T)

August 27, 2026 updated by: Elizabeth Moore, University of Indianapolis
This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and potential effects of Learning to THRIVE (L2T), a six-week online educational self-management program for adults who self-identified as women or female and had interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). L2T combined self-paced online educational materials with a weekly live virtual group session. The primary feasibility objectives were recruitment, engagement, and retention. Exploratory outcomes included IC/BPS symptom and problem severity, pain intensity, pain-related interference and distress, and self-efficacy for chronic disease management. Qualitative data were collected to understand participants' experiences with the program.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

L2T used a flipped-classroom format over six weeks. Participants reviewed asynchronous e-learning materials each week and then attended a 60-90 minute live virtual group session facilitated by the research team to discuss and apply the lesson content. The program was informed by the THRIVE model, chronic pain science, adult learning, and instructional design principles. Quantitative assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 weeks after the intervention. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended survey questions, weekly lesson feedback, recordings of synchronous sessions, and post-intervention semi-structured interviews. This ClinicalTrials.gov record was entered retrospectively after study completion and was reconstructed from contemporaneous IRB-approved study materials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46227
        • University of Indianapolis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identifies as a woman or female
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Self-reported healthcare provider-confirmed diagnosis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS)
  • Pelvic pain, pressure, or discomfort for at least 6 months, of at least moderate severity (greater than 3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale), causing weekly life interference and limiting life or work-related activities, general activity level, and/or enjoyment of life during the prior 3 months
  • Reliable access to a computer and Internet connection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to speak/read English
  • Neurological condition (for example, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, paraplegia) or other condition affecting the bladder
  • History or presence of cystitis caused by tuberculosis, radiation, or chemotherapy
  • Diagnosed and treated for a pelvic-related malignancy (colon, bladder, ovarian, endometrial, uterine, cervical, vaginal, or rectal cancer)
  • Physical or psychological comorbidity that would adversely affect ability to participate
  • Currently pregnant
  • Gross cognitive impairment, deafness, blindness, or severe vision/hearing problems that could not be accommodated
  • Current psychotherapy directed specifically toward relief of urological symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Learning to THRIVE Program
Participants received the six-week Learning to THRIVE online educational self-management program.
A six-week online self-management program using a flipped-classroom format. Each week, participants reviewed asynchronous e-learning materials and attended one 60-90 minute live virtual group meeting facilitated by the research team. Content addressed goal setting and safe-group expectations; chronic pain and factors influencing pain; self-care, habits, and self-efficacy; relationships, communication, and sexual health; informed healthcare decision-making and evaluation of health claims; and reflection with long-term action planning.
Other Names:
  • Learning to THRIVE
  • L2T

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Enrolled During the Recruitment Period
Time Frame: During the recruitment period, approximately 3 weeks
Number of participants who provided informed consent and enrolled during the planned recruitment period. The protocol planned to recruit 16 participants.
During the recruitment period, approximately 3 weeks
Participant-Reported Time Spent Reviewing Weekly Asynchronous Lessons
Time Frame: Weekly during the 6-week intervention
Approximate time spent reviewing each weekly lesson, self-reported on the weekly lesson feedback form. Summarize using the metric used in the analysis (for example, median hours per week).
Weekly during the 6-week intervention
Number of Weekly Live Virtual Sessions Attended
Time Frame: During the 6-week intervention
Facilitator-recorded attendance across the six weekly synchronous virtual meetings. Each participant could attend 0 to 6 sessions; a percentage of sessions attended may also be derived.
During the 6-week intervention
Number of Enrolled Participants Retained Through the Final Follow-Up Assessment
Time Frame: From enrollment through 6 weeks after the 6-week intervention, approximately 12 weeks
Number and percentage of enrolled participants who remained in the study through the six-week post-intervention data-collection point. The protocol planned to recruit 16 participants and hoped to retain at least 12 through the intervention and post-intervention data-collection period.
From enrollment through 6 weeks after the 6-week intervention, approximately 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
O'Leary-Sant ICSI total score, range 0-20; higher scores indicate greater urinary/pain symptom severity.
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
O'Leary-Sant ICPI total score, range 0-16; higher scores indicate greater symptom-related problems.
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain Intensity Severity Category
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain intensity during the prior week assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 and categorized according to the protocol as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10).
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain Interference Severity Category
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain-related interference with activities during the prior week assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 and categorized as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10).
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain-Related Distress Severity Category
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain-related distress during the prior week assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 and categorized as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10).
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Six-item SEMCD scale scored from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in managing chronic disease. The protocol included SEMCD as a quantitative outcome at all three assessments.
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant Perceptions of Program Acceptability and Experience
Time Frame: Weekly during the 6-week intervention and within 1 month after intervention completion; open-ended survey data also collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions on the study surveys, weekly lesson feedback, recorded live group discussions, and semi-structured post-intervention interviews. Weekly feedback addressed key takeaways, useful content, areas needing greater clarity, and additional comments. Interviews explored expectations, program structure, content usefulness, facilitator/peer interaction, safety and comfort, application of learning, and whether participants would recommend the program. Data were prospectively planned for thematic analysis.
Weekly during the 6-week intervention and within 1 month after intervention completion; open-ended survey data also collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The informed consent permits possible future research use or sharing of de-identified study data, but a specific individual participant data sharing plan, access mechanism, and timetable have not yet been established.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe