- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07808476
Efficacy Of Gross Myofascial Release With Neural Mobilization Versus Neural Mobilization Alone On Pain, Functional Limitations, And Cervical Range Of Motion In Cervical Radiculopathy
September 7, 2026 updated by: Ibadat International University, Islamabad
This is a randomized control trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of gross myofascial release with neural mobilization versus neural mobilization alone on pain, functional limitations, and cervical range of motion in cervical radiculopathy.
Cervical radiculopathy, is characterized by neck pain, pain radiating down the arm, numbness, tingling, weakness of muscles and functionality limitations with compression or irritation of the cervical nerve root due to cervical spondylosis, cervical disc herniations or degeneration of the cervical spine leading to cervical radiculopathy and the diminished quality of life from decreased day-to-day functional capacity and productivity at work.
The study will evaluate pain, functional limitations, and cervical range of motion.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
44
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: komal hameed, MSPT
- Phone Number: +923315798880
- Email: komal.hamees4455@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Salma Bibi, DPT, MS OMPT
- Phone Number: +923417312210
- Email: salma.bibi@uipt.iiui.edu.pk
Study Locations
-
-
KPK
-
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
- Recruiting
- My Health Wellness center, Peshawar
-
Contact:
- Dr. Naeem ullah (PT), DPT, MS PT MSK
- Phone Number: +923308088558
- Email: naeemphysio58@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female patients aged between 25-55 years
- Presence of chronic neck pain radiating to one upper limb
- Positive Upper Limb Tension Test-I (Median nerve)
- Patients having pain, numbness, tingling, or paresthesia in the cervical nerve root distribution.
- Symptom's duration of at least 4 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with cervical myelopathy
- History of cervical spine fracture, tumor, infection, or malignancy
- Previous cervical spine surgery
- Severe osteoporosis or inflammatory joint disease
- Presence of systemic neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis or stroke
- Patients with severe cervical instability or vertebral artery insufficiency
- Recent physiotherapy treatment for cervical radiculopathy within the last 3 months
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization
Participants in this group will receive Gross Myofascial Release followed by median nerve neural mobilization.
The GMFR intervention will include a gross stretch of the posterior cervical musculature and an upper-quarter (arm pull) fascial stretch.
The stretch will be maintained for 90 seconds or until a palpable release of fascial tension is appreciated.
Neural mobilization will be performed using the median nerve slider technique.
Neural mobilization will be performed by simultaneously moving the shoulder into greater abduction while the cervical spine is moved into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding(1 set of 10 repetitions with a 3-second hold per repetition).
Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment.
The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions).
|
Participants allocated to the experimental group will receive Gross Myofascial Release (GMFR) followed by median nerve neural mobilization.
The GMFR intervention will include a gross stretch of the posterior cervical musculature and an upper-quarter (arm pull) fascial stretch.
The stretch will be maintained for 90 seconds or until a palpable release of fascial tension is appreciated.
Neural mobilization will be performed using the median nerve slider technique.. Neural mobilization will be performed by simultaneously moving the shoulder into greater abduction while the cervical spine is moved into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding(1 set of 10 repetitions with a 3-second hold per repetition).
Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment.
The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions).
|
|
Active Comparator: Neural Mobilization with conventional therapy
Participants allocated to the control group will receive neural mobilization technique.
The intervention will be performed with the participant in the supine position, with the shoulder abducted and externally rotated, elbow extended, forearm supinated, and wrist, fingers, and thumb maintained in extension.
Neural mobilization will be applied by simultaneously increasing shoulder abduction while moving the cervical spine into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding.
Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment.
The treatment will be administered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with each repetition held for 3 seconds and a 60-second rest interval between sets, The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions).
|
Participants allocated to the control group will receive neural mobilization technique.
The intervention will be performed with the participant in the supine position, with the shoulder abducted and externally rotated, elbow extended, forearm supinated, and wrist, fingers, and thumb maintained in extension.
Neural mobilization will be applied by simultaneously increasing shoulder abduction while moving the cervical spine into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding.
Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment.
The treatment will be administered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with each repetition held for 3 seconds and a 60-second rest interval between sets, The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Universal Goniometer
Time Frame: Baseline to 4th week
|
The Universal Goniometer (UG) will used in this study to measure active cervical range of motion (ROM), is a simple, inexpensive, and portable clinical instrument that provides objective measurements of joint movement in degrees.
Cervical range of motion is recorded in degrees (°) for each movement direction.
Lower ROM values indicate greater movement restriction and functional impairment, whereas higher values reflect improved cervical mobility.
|
Baseline to 4th week
|
|
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Baseline to 4th week
|
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) will used in this study to evaluate the level of functional disability associated with cervical radiculopathy.
The NDI is one of the most widely accepted patient-reported outcome measures for assessing the impact of neck pain on daily functioning.
The questionnaire consists of 10 items, including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreational activities.
Each item is scored from 0 to 5, The total NDI score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores representing greater functional disability.
For clinical interpretation, scores are commonly classified as follows: 0-4 (no disability), 5-14 (mild disability), 15-24 (moderate disability), 25-34 (severe disability), and 35-50 (complete disability).
A reduction in the total score following treatment indicates an improvement in functional status and a decreased impact of neck pain on daily activities.
|
Baseline to 4th week
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to 4th week
|
The intensity of the pain will be measured with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The VAS is a 10-cm horizontal line with two opposite endpoints marked with the following words: "no pain" at one end and "worst imaginable pain" at the other.
The patient will then mark a point on the line that they feel most accurately reflects their current pain.
The distance in centimeters or millimeters between the "no pain" point and the patient's mark will be taken as the measure of the patient's pain.
|
Baseline to 4th week
|
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline to 4th week
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine was used in this study to confirm the diagnosis cervical radiculopathy before participant enrollment.
It enables accurate identification of disc herniation, foraminal stenosis, nerve root compression, and other degenerative changes associated with cervical radiculopathy.
|
Baseline to 4th week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Chair: salma bibi, Ibadat International University, Islamabad
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Agarwal, V., Goel, A., Srivastava, A., Rawat, P., & Singh, R. (2024). Optimizing Pain Relief and Range of Motion in Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Study on Neural Tissue Mobilization and Cervical Stabilization Exercises. Cureus, 16(7), e65646. doi:10.7759/cureus.65646 Borrella-Andrés, S., Marqués-García, I., Lucha-López, M. O., Fanlo-Mazas, P., Hernández-Secorún, M., Pérez-Bellmunt, A., . . . Hidalgo-García, C. (2021). Manual Therapy as a Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 9936981. doi:10.1155/2021/9936981 Butler, D. S. (2005). The neurodynamic techniques: a definitive guide from the Noigroup team: Noigroup publications. Gauns, S. V., & Gurudut, P. V. (2018). A randomized controlled trial to study the effect of gross myofascial release on mechanical neck pain referred to upper limb. International journal of health sciences, 12(5), 51. Kuligowski, T., Skrzek, A., & Cieślik, B. (2021). Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(11). doi:10.3390/ijerph18116176 Lopez-Pardo, M. J., Calvache-Mateo, A., Martin-Nunez, J., Heredia-Ciuro, A., Lopez-Lopez, L., Valenza, M. C., & Cabrera-Martos, I. (2024). Routine physical therapy with and without neural mobilization in chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders with nerve-related symptoms: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Healthcare. Lutke Schipholt, I. J., Scholten-Peeters, G. G. M., Logghe, S., Koop, M., Donders, S., Stenneberg, M. S., & Coppieters, M. W. (2024). The CROM-VAS Test: A novel and reliable clinical test to assess immediate pain relief following treatment for movement-evoked neck pain. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 74, 103191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103191 Mahmoud, L., Aly, S., & Abd Alhamid, H. M. M. (2025). Gross myofascial release on pain and function in cervical radiculopathy: a randomised controlled study. Human Movement, 26,
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 10, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 7, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
September 8, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 8, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 7, 2026
Last Verified
September 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/07/371
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.